Elsevier

Clinical Positron Imaging

Volume 1, Issue 3, Summer 1998, Pages 185-191
Clinical Positron Imaging

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Serial Evaluation of Increased Chest Wall F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Uptake Following Radiation Therapy in Patients With Bronchogenic Carcinoma

Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose: Following radiation therapy for bronchogenic carcinoma, increased FDG accumulation within the irradiated tissue can be identified. This finding has not been well characterized. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the time course, frequency, and intensity of increased FDG uptake over a one-year period in patients who had been treated with radiation therapy. Materials and Methods: Serial FDG-PET studies (n = 38) were performed in patients (n = 12) with bronchogenic carcinoma before and after radiation therapy. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the chest wall and activity concentrations of posttherapy studies were compared to pretherapy studies. FDG uptake was also described qualitatively relative to mediastinal activity (1–4 scale) by two observers blinded from clinical information. Results: Chest wall radiation port ROI uptake was 18% higher in the 2-month (P = 0.08), 40% higher in the 6-month (P = 0.003), and 32% higher in the 12-month (P = 0.04) posttherapy studies than in non-port ROIs. In 6 patients that clinically had radiation-induced chest wall fibrosis or pneumonitis, visual interpretation identified abnormal chest wall or pleural region FDG uptake in 5/6. In 2/6 patients without clinical chest wall fibrosis, abnormal, chest wall FDG uptake was seen. Conclusions: Radiation therapy occasionally causes modestly increased soft tissue FDG uptake within irradiated soft tissue in patients being treated for bronchogenic carcinoma, which persists for up to one year after therapy.

Introduction

Radiation therapy has been the treatment of choice for patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Such patients who have typically been treated with doses of 6,000–7,000 rad have a median survival of 12 months and patients with all types of lung cancer have a 5-year survival of 5–10%.1, 2 The local control rates achieved in such patients have been difficult to assess but are generally poor.3 These results have prompted efforts to improve local control, and possibly survival, through dose escalation.4 The accurate assessment of the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy and radiation therapy is of great importance if survival from lung cancer is to be improved. A typical radiation dose for treating non-small cell carcinoma is 6,000 rads. Few patients are cured by this dose. If the incomplete responders without metastases could be identified, escalating the radiation dose could be considered.

Anatomic imaging is of little help in evaluating the effect of radiation or chemotherapy.5 The pulmonary changes from persistent tumor, scarring, atelectasis, and necrosis after therapy cannot be differentiated by CT or MRI. Tumor size can decrease after therapy but may not be an accurate indicator of tumor response. Tissue biopsy is subject to sampling error.

Increased glucose metabolism is a well-described property of malignant tumor cells,6, 7, 8 and several studies have demonstrated the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in distinguishing benign from malignant abnormalities in the thorax9, 10 and in identifying tumor recurrence.11, 12

In evaluating tumor recurrence in patients who have received radiation therapy, we occasionally identify increased FDG uptake in thoracic structures presumably due to the inflammatory reaction following radiation therapy. Studies have shown increased FDG accumulation at the sties of infection or inflammation.9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Presumably, increased FDG accumulation will diminish after completion of radiation therapy with diminution of inflammation. The time course or duration of increased FDG uptake following radiation therapy has not been described and is important in the evaluation of recurrent disease. We, therefore, retrospectively evaluated serial FDG-PET studies to determine the time course, frequency, and intensity of increased FDG uptake over a one-year period in patients who had been treated with radiation.

Section snippets

Patients

Patients (n = 12) with bronchogenic carcinoma who were to received radiation therapy (average dose = 7,101 ± 465 rads) were referred for evaluation by FDG-PET. FDG-PET studies (n = 38) were performed before and serially after radiation therapy in all patients as part of other FDG-PET/radiation therapy protocols. Posttherapy studies were performed at 2 months (mean = 70 ± 30 days) in 9 patients, 6 months (mean = 195 ± 47 days) in 11 patients, and 12 months (mean = 342 ± 102 days) in 5 patients.

Results

Chest wall ROI uptake in the irradiated regions was 18% higher in the 2-month (P = 0.08), 40% higher in the 6-month (P = 0.003), and 32% higher in the 12-month (P = 0.04) posttherapy studies than in non-port ROIs Figure 2, Figure 3. The mean standardized uptake ratio (SUR) for the 7 patients with increased FDG uptake (from selected port regions with the most uptake) was 1.8 ± 0.6. Two patients showed SURs of 2.5 or greater (2.6 and 2.6).

No patients had clinical evidence of metastatic disease to

Discussion

In this report, we describe patients treated with radiation therapy for bronchogenic carcinoma who had serial FDG-PET studies. FDG-PET imaging may be a valuable tool in the treatment of patients with locally advanced lung cancer. FDG-PET could possibly assist in radiation therapy planning by focusing radiation fields to precise areas of tumor activity, preventing both irradiation of uninvolved areas and omission of regions of active tumor from radiation ports. FDG-PET imaging also provides

Conclusion

Patients evaluated with FDG-PET for recurrence of bronchogenic carcinoma after having received radiation therapy may have abnormal FDG uptake in radiation port regions that can persist for at least one year after therapy and is probably due to inflammation and tissue regeneration. The uptake is generally of minimal intensity but in a few cases may be similar to that seen with malignant disease. Review of radiation port locations is recommended in the evaluation of FDG-PET data in these patients.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Thomas C. Hawk for his dedication in performing the ROI measurements for this study.

References (15)

  • D.G. Bragg

    Current applications of imaging procedures in the patient with lung cancer

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1991)
  • G.L. Becker et al.

    The impact of thoracic computed tomography in clinically staged T1, N0, M0 chest lesions

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (1990)
  • D. Recine et al.

    Combined modality therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

    Cancer

    (1990)
  • R.J. Ginsberg et al.

    Cancer of the Lung

  • J.D. Cox et al.

    A randomized phase I/II trial of hyperfractionated radiation therapy with total doses of 60.0 Gy to 79.2 Gy. Possible survival benefit with > 69.9 Gy in favorable patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancerReport of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-11

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1990)
  • O. Warburg

    The metabolism of tumors

    (1930)
  • G. Weber

    Enzymology of cancer cells. Part I

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1977)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • PET imaging of head and neck cancer

    2022, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: Volume 1-4
  • PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Head and Neck Cancers Including Thyroid Cancer

    2021, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    FDG uptake is increased in recently irradiated tissues and is more intense in tissues that received a higher radiation dose. The increased uptake can last for 12-16 months post radiotherapy.165 Overlap in the SUVmax values demonstrated in radiation related inflammatory change and that of recurrent disease can lead to diagnostic uncertainty, particularly early on (less than 2 months post therapy).166,167

  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

    2015, Clinical Radiation Oncology
  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

    2012, Clinical Radiation Oncology: Third Edition
  • Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

    2011, Clinical Radiation Oncology, Third Edition
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text