Elsevier

Academic Radiology

Volume 12, Issue 8, August 2005, Pages 1010-1023
Academic Radiology

Computer assisted radiology and surgery
Projection Extension for Region Of Interest Imaging in Cone-Beam CT1

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.04.017Get rights and content

Rationale and Objectives

For 3D X-ray imaging during interventions, changes of the imaged object are often restricted to a small part of the field of view, suggesting region of interest (ROI) imaging by irradiating this area only. In this article, we present a novel method for extension of truncated projections in order to avoid truncation artifacts in C-arm based 3D ROI imaging.

Materials and Methods

The method makes use of prior knowledge by combining forward projections of a previously acquired, nontruncated 3D reference image with the truncated ROI projections. Rigid registration between the two datasets is achieved by using a technique based on local cross-correlation. To account for a gray value mismatch between the two data sets due to, e.g., differing beam quality and different contributions of scattered radiation, a linear gray level transformation is applied to the forward-projected reference data.

Results

The performance of different gray value transformation schemes is systematically assessed by means of numerical simulations. For various simulated scenarios, the best performing transformation has been identified, providing practical guidelines for selecting a scheme depending on the origin of the gray-level mismatch. Experiments prove the high performance of the developed method.

Conclusion

The presented technique enables almost artifact-free 3D ROI imaging during interventions. This actually allows for repeated scans at low dose and enables intraprocedural imaging of large objects even with a small detector. However, applicability of the method is limited to scenarios where direct access to a reference image, e.g., a prior CT scan, is available.

Section snippets

Overview of the method

The method for correction of truncation errors during reconstruction consists of the following steps. First, a preliminary reconstruction of the ROI is performed using the standard elliptical projection extension method similar to the one described in (3) in order to approximatively compensate for the truncation artifacts. In essence, each row of each truncated projection is extended by fitting an elliptical arc to both of its ends. The lateral extent of the elliptical arc is controlled by an

Differing Beam Quality

In cases where the reference volume has been acquired with a different modality, e.g. CT, it usually has also been acquired with a different X-ray spectrum. Due to the energy dependence of the attenuation coefficient, different line integral values are thus obtained for the forward projection of the reference volume and for the measured ROI projections. To investigate the effect of differences in beam quality, the projections of the reference volume have been simulated with a mono-energetic

Discussion

In this work, we have presented an accurate method for compensation of truncation artifacts in cone-beam CT. The method works by laterally extending truncated projections using forward-projected data of an a priori available truncation-free reference volume. For the practical application of this technique it has been shown that adequate gray level transformations prior to reconstruction are essential to compensate for differing gray level scales of both data sources caused by, e.g., differing

References (13)

  • G. Rose et al.

    , Image quality of flat panel cone-beam CT

    Proc of SPIE

    (2003)
  • J. Wiegert et al.

    , Soft tissue contrast resolution within the head of human cadaver by means of flat detector based cone-beam CT

    Proc of SPIE

    (2004)
  • R.M. Lewitt

    Processing of incomplete measurement data in computed tomography

    Med Phys

    (1979)
  • K. Ramamurthi et al.

    Tomographic reconstruction for truncated cone beam data using prior CT information

  • L.A. Feldkamp et al.

    Practical cone-beam algorithm

    J Opt Soc Am A

    (1984)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text