Brief Report
ED patients with vertigo: can we identify clinical factors associated with acute stroke?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2011.02.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Vertigo is a common emergency department (ED) complaint with benign and serious etiologies with overlapping features. Misdiagnosis of acute stroke may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to computer tomography (CT) for diagnosis of acute stroke but is costly with limited availability.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify clinical characteristics associated with a cerebrovascular cause for vertigo.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review on patients with an MRI for vertigo, with or without additional historical or physical examination findings, over 18 months. Study patients were seen in the ED for vertigo within 2 weeks of MRI. Data collected included medical history, physical findings, and imaging results. Fisher's exact test was used to identify factors associated with the primary outcome, an acute stroke.

Results

There were 325 eligible patients; 131 were ED patients. Patients were 57 (±18) years, and 53% were women. There were 12 ED patients with a new stroke (9.2%). Two variables were associated with acute stroke: a presenting complaint of gait instability (odds ratio, 9.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-33.9) or a subtle neurologic finding (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-33.1). One patient with a new stroke had a prior stroke, 3 were age >65 years, and none had coronary artery disease or dysrhythmia. Among patients with acute stroke, 5 also had head CT, and none detected the stroke.

Conclusions

This study identified 2 variables associated with acute stroke that should be considered in the evaluation of ED patients with vertigo. Head CT was inadequate for diagnosing acute stroke in this patient population.

Introduction

Dizziness and vertigo are common complaints, accounting for approximately 7.5 million visits to ambulatory care settings annually [1]. Dizziness has historically been classified into 4 categories: vertigo, lightheadedness, presyncope, and disequilibrium. Of these 4, vertigo is the most common and is believed to represent roughly 54% of dizziness complaints [2]. Although the large majority of patients with dizziness have benign processes that are not life or brain threatening, a small percentage is due to serious central nervous system pathology including space occupying lesions, infarction, and other processes. Clinically, there is significant overlap in the presentation of patients with peripheral and central causes; symptoms of dizziness, vertigo, nausea, vomiting, imbalance, and headache are all common and nonspecific; and stroke is equally likely to be associated with vertigo as nonvertiginous dizziness [1], [3].

For the emergency physician facing a broad range of potential etiologies, there is little research to guide risk stratification for our undifferentiated patient population, and recent data suggest that even neurologists may have difficulty in identifying cerebrovascular disease in the vertebrobasilar system [4]. Distinguishing patients with central processes from those with benign peripheral causes is crucial because patients with a misdiagnosed central nervous system etiology of dizziness have a propensity for bad outcomes. In one case series, half of the patients with missed cerebellar infarctions were less than 50 years, the mortality rate was 40%, and half of all survivors had disabling deficits [5].

As a consequence of this uncertainty and the cost of a missed stroke, patients with dizziness tend to consume greater health care resources than nondizzy emergency department (ED) patients, including longer lengths of stay in the ED and higher rates of admission, cardiac monitoring, and diagnostic imaging [6], [7]. Although head computed tomography (CT) is used widely in the ED setting, it has poor sensitivity for brain ischemia or infarction, especially in the posterior fossa. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging test of choice, but it has several practical limitations, including its poor real-time availability in the emergent setting [8].

At present, there are wide variations in clinical management of ED patients with vertigo because very little focused data exist in the emergency medicine literature to improve both our understanding and risk stratification of this patient population. We performed this study as an initial step toward this end. We retrospectively reviewed charts of all patients who received an MRI for the indication of vertigo either emergently or within 2 weeks of an ED visit for vertigo. Our goal was to determine the feasibility of creating a risk profile for ED patients with vertigo at risk for acute stroke at time of initial presentation.

Section snippets

Setting

The study was performed at an urban academic medical center with an annual ED census of 53 000 patients and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited Emergency Medicine and Neurology residency programs. Magnetic resonance imaging is available 24 hours a day for emergency cases. Informed consent was waived via expedited review of the institutional review board at our institution.

Study design

Patients were identified via an electronic query of the MRI patient database for the

Results

There were 325 patients who had an MRI for the indication of vertigo during the study period, of whom 131 (40%) were seen in the ED; 118 of these patients had an MRI during the index hospitalization, and 13 had an MRI within 2 weeks of the ED visit. Non-ED patients (60%) were referred from primary care, neurology, and oncology clinics primarily. Patients were 57 (±18) years, and 53% were women (Table 1). Overall, there were 27 patients (8.3%) with a new MRI finding including 12 strokes, 1

Discussion

Although a finding of multiple sclerosis or a new mass is of obvious importance in the evaluation of ED patients with acute vertigo, we focused our investigation on acute stroke because there are clear data that if these patients are not diagnosed, monitored, and treated properly, they may have worse outcomes [3], [5].

In our small patient sample, we did not find that traditional cardiovascular risk factors were associated with a higher risk for stroke. In fact, the average age of our patients

Conclusion

Acute posterior circulation infarction can present with common, nonspecific clinical findings and a normal head CT. Despite the limitations of our retrospective study, we were able to identify 2 clinical features in our patient population associated with acute stroke. These findings underscore that a thorough history and physical examination focused on cerebellar and posterior circulation functions performed in real time at the bedside are keys to the diagnostic workup for patients with

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (39)

  • Effectiveness of Clinical Risk Factors in the Detection of Central Pathology in Patients With Isolated Vertigo

    2021, Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    It was reported that about 15–33% of posterior circulatory strokes were misclassified as acute peripheral vertigo in the ED (7). Cases of missed cerebellar infarction are at high risk for complications, and mortality was found to be 40% in this group (8). Therefore, determination of the central etiologies in patients presenting with vertigo or dizziness is critical in terms of reducing morbidity and mortality.

  • A Posterior Circulation Ischemia Risk Score System to Assist the Diagnosis of Dizziness

    2018, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
    Citation Excerpt :

    Only .74% of the dizzy patients evaluated by computerized tomography who showed clinically significant pathology required intervention. However, several guidelines and studies have made specific recommendations against neuroimaging, stating that computerized tomography and MRI are largely insensitive to such a serious condition as PCI, and their costs are high.13-16 Because no criterion or protocol is available in evaluating the potential risk, how to distinguish PCI has become a clinical as well as a public concern.

  • A New Approach to the Diagnosis of Acute Dizziness in Adult Patients

    2016, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Various studies have tried to identify risk factors for ED dizzy patients with CNS causes.1,15,17–20 One ED study of dizzy patients found that abnormal gait and subtle neurologic deficits on neurologic examination were associated with a CNS cause.17 Overall, the risk factors include increasing age, vascular risk factors, history of previous stroke, complaint of “instability,” and focal neurologic findings (Table 1).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at: Society for Academic Emergency Medicine National Conference, 2009.

View full text