Original article
Measuring Muscle Strength for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Retest Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.002Get rights and content

Abstract

O’Shea SD, Taylor NF, Paratz JD. Measuring muscle strength for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry.

Objective

To evaluate the retest reliability and quantify the degree of measurement error when measuring isometric muscle strength with a hand-held dynamometer for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design

Retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry for 4 muscle groups was assessed on 2 occasions separated by a 2-week interval.

Setting

Community rehabilitation center.

Participants

Eight men and 4 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 71.4±10.3y) with moderately severe COPD (percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 41.5%±17.7%).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Muscle strength (in kilograms). Statistical analysis was conducted by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals for both group and individual scores.

Results

All reliability coefficients were greater than .79. Muscle strength would need to increase by between 4% and 18% in groups of people with COPD and between 34% and 58% in a person with COPD to be 95% confident of detecting real changes.

Conclusions

Hand-held dynamometry is suitable for monitoring change in muscle strength and testing hypotheses for groups of people with COPD. However, hand-held dynamometry is not likely to detect changes in muscle strength for a person with COPD.

Section snippets

Participants

Nine men and 4 women with COPD were recruited from a database of former pulmonary rehabilitation participants at a regional health service. Sample size estimates undertaken according to the method described by Walter et al18 indicated that 12 people would be appropriate if reliability coefficients were anticipated to be between 0.6 and 0.9, which is well within the range reported in previous investigations.10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 People were excluded from the investigation if they had

Results

One man withdrew from the study because he was unable to complete the second testing session because of an unrelated illness. The characteristics of the remaining 12 participants are given in table 2. All but 1 participant had an extensive smoking history, and long-term oxygen therapy had been prescribed for 33% of participants. Cardiovascular problems were the most commonly reported comorbidities (n=7), followed by musculoskeletal conditions such as osteoarthritis (n=4) and osteoporosis (n=4).

Discussion

The protocol used for assessing isometric muscle strength in this study had good retest reliability, as evidenced by ICCs greater than or equal to .79. The correlation coefficients of the current study are similar to retest reliability coefficients reported in assessing the isometric strength of using hand-held dynamometers in other populations12, 15, 16 and not inconsistent with results reported with people with COPD using a Cybex dynamometer (ICC>.88).3 However, sole use of reliability

Conclusions

Hand-held dynamometry is a simple, portable, and inexpensive option for clinicians wanting to obtain measures of isometric muscle strength for people with COPD. The device showed good reliability coefficients and was suitable for measuring mean changes in muscle force generation for groups of people with COPD; therefore, it could appropriately be applied to monitoring changes in group programs. However, caution should be used when examining muscle strength for a person with COPD, because

References (36)

  • S. Mathur et al.

    Test-retest reliability of isometric and isokinetic torque in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Physiother Can

    (2004)
  • H.M. Clarkson et al.

    Musculoskeletal assessment: joint range of motion and manual muscle strength

    (1999)
  • R.W. Bohannon

    Measuring knee extensor muscle strength

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (2001)
  • W.C. Beasley

    Influence of method on estimates of normal knee extensor force among normal and post polio children

    Phys Ther Rev

    (1956)
  • A.W. Andrews et al.

    Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers

    Phys Ther

    (1996)
  • R.W. Bohannon

    Make tests and break tests of elbow flexor muscle strength

    Phys Ther

    (1988)
  • P.W. Stratford et al.

    A comparison of make and break tests using a hand-held dynamometer and the Kin-Com

    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

    (1994)
  • D. Riddle et al.

    Intrasession and intersession reliability of hand-held dynamometry measurements take on brain-damaged patients

    Phys Ther

    (1989)
  • Cited by (105)

    • Prognostic value of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test for mortality in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

      2022, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      For QMVC, participants remained seated with knee flexed 70°, and the dynamometer was placed on the anterior tibia 5 cm above the lateral malleolus. Two trials were performed per test as described previously. [19]. The 6MWT (measured in meters) was performed indoors along a flat, straight, 30-m walking course.

    • Physiotherapy during and after acute exacerbation of COPD

      2022, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires
    • Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD

      2021, Encyclopedia of Respiratory Medicine, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

    View full text