Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 66, Issue 8, August 2011, Pages 760-767
Clinical Radiology

Pictorial Review
Imaging of postoperative middle ear cholesteatoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.12.019Get rights and content

Cholesteatoma is often treated surgically using canal wall-preserving techniques. Clinical and otoscopic diagnosis of residual or recurrent disease after this form of surgery is unreliable and thus radiological imaging is often used prior to mandatory “second-look” surgery. Imaging needs to be able to differentiate residual or recurrent disease from granulation tissue, inflammatory tissue or fluid within the middle ear cavity and mastoid cavity. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and delayed contrast MRI have all been used in detecting postoperative cholesteatoma. Although delayed contrast MRI performs better than HRCT and conventional MRI, the sensitivities and specificities of these different imaging methods are relatively poor. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI and, in particular, non-echo planar DWI) has been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting recurrent cholesteatoma. In this review we provide examples of postoperative imaging appearances following cholesteatoma surgery and we review the relevant literature with an emphasis on studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of DWI.

Introduction

A cholesteatoma is a non-neoplastic lesion of the middle ear cleft, or any other pneumatized portion of the temporal bone, that is associated with bony erosion.1 Histologically, a cholesteatoma is characterized by desquamated debris surrounded by layers of keratinizing squamous epithelium.2 Both congenital and acquired forms of cholesteatoma exist.3 Congenital cholesteatoma is relatively rare with a reported incidence of 0.12 per 100,000.4 Classically, congenital cholesteatoma develops behind an intact tympanic membrane without evidence of previous middle ear infection and is likely to be caused by the persistence of foetal epidermoid tissue.5 Acquired cholesteatoma is more common and usually a consequence of chronic middle ear inflammation. Although the exact incidence is unknown, European epidemiological studies quote an incidence of 9.2 per 100,000.1, 6 The classical clinical presentation of cholesteatoma is an offensive otorrhoea associated with a conductive hearing loss due to ossicular erosion. Less commonly, it may be asymptomatic or present with complications such as vertigo, facial paralysis, mastoiditis, or meningitis. Given the severity of potential complications that may ensue from untreated cholesteatoma and the lack of successful medical treatment, surgical intervention is offered to all patients able to tolerate general anaesthesia.

Section snippets

Choice of surgical procedure

Surgical intervention can be broadly classified as canal wall down surgery (CWD) or canal wall up surgery (CWU) depending on whether the posterior canal wall is preserved (Fig 1). Both categories of surgical procedure have advantages and disadvantages and the choice of surgical procedure remains a contentious issue between different surgeons.7, 8, 9 CWD procedures are often performed when cholesteatoma has eroded through a large portion of the external auditory canal, if there is evidence of a

Choice of imaging

The primary role of imaging in the management of postoperative cholesteatoma is to detect any residual or recurrent disease. It particular, it needs to be able to differentiate residual or recurrent disease from granulation tissue, fibrosis, inflammatory tissue, or fluid within the middle ear cavity and mastoid cavity. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MRI) have been used in detecting postoperative cholesteatoma and their diagnostic performance evaluated.

Current role of imaging

Currently, non-EPI DWI has shown the greatest promise in detecting cholesteatoma following surgery. However, its exact role in the management of postoperative cholesteatoma has yet to be fully defined and there are currently no formal guidelines for its use with respect to cholesteatoma surgery. Even though non-EPI DWI has been shown to perform well in detecting postoperative cholesteatoma, the current prospective studies comprised only small numbers of patients and a variable time from the

References (40)

  • R. Persaud et al.

    Evidence-based review of aetiopathogenic theories of congenital and acquired cholesteatoma

    J Laryngol Otol

    (2007)
  • L. Michaels

    An epidermoid formation in the developing middle ear: possible source of cholesteatoma

    J Otolaryngol

    (1986)
  • H.O. Kemppainen et al.

    Epidemiology and aetiology of middle ear cholesteatoma

    Acta Oto-Laryngologica

    (1999)
  • G.F. Hulka et al.

    A randomized, blinded study of canal wall up versus canal wall down mastoidectomy determining the differences in viewing middle ear anatomy and pathology

    Am J Otol

    (1998)
  • P. Harkness et al.

    Mastoidectomy audit: results of the Royal College of surgeons of England comparative audit of ENT surgery

    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci

    (1995)
  • V. Darrouzet et al.

    Preference for the closed technique in the management of cholesteatoma of the middle ear in children: a retrospective study of 215 consecutive patients treated over 10 years

    Am J Otol

    (2000)
  • R.P. Mills

    Management of chronic otitis media

  • J.B. Nadol

    Causes of failure of mastoidectomy for chronic otitis media

    Laryngoscope

    (1985)
  • S.Y. Ho et al.

    Efficacy of the 2-staged procedure in the management of cholesteatoma

    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2003)
  • P.A. Tierney et al.

    An assessment of the value of the preoperative computed tomography scans prior to otoendoscopic “second look” in intact canal wall mastoid surgery

    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci

    (1999)
  • Cited by (62)

    • Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of orbital disease

      2022, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
    • Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2019, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The vast majority of studies included in this review utilised non-EPI DW-MRI as opposed to the older EPI technique. Non-EPI sequences carry several advantages over EPI including reduced susceptibility artefacts, better spatial resolution, thinner slices, and a faster acquisition time, leading to an improved overall diagnostic performance [10,12,13]. Importantly, the longer acquisition time associated with EPI compared to non-EPI sequences may necessitate sedation or general anaesthesia with young children.

    • Inflammation of the Temporal Bone

      2019, Neuroimaging Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      This process may be challenging if there is soft tissue opacification of the entire middle ear cleft on HRCT with coexisting fluid and inflammation, and supplementing with nonechoplanar DWI can provide a better surgical map.16 On MR imaging, cholesteatoma appears as follows.17,18 Intermediate signal on T1W imaging,

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text