CommentaryCommentary on discrepancies in discrepancy meetings
References (12)
- et al.
Where failures occur in the imaging care cycle: lessons from the Radiology Events Register
J Am Coll Radiol
(2010) - et al.
Getting the most out of RADPEER
J Am Coll Radiol
(2011) - Board of the Faculty of Clinical Radiology, The Royal College of Radiologists. Standards for Radiology Discrepancy...
- et al.
Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the RADPEER system
AJR Am J Roentgenol
(2012) - et al.
Interrater variation in scoring radiological discrepancies
Br J Radiol
(2013) - et al.
Rethinking peer review: what aviation can teach radiology about performance improvement
Radiology
(2011)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (3)
Learning from error: A nuclear medicine events and learning meeting
2022, Nuclear Medicine CommunicationsError and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable?
2017, Insights into ImagingInterobserver agreement in the interpretation of outpatient head CT scans in an academic neuroradiology practice
2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology
Copyright © 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.