Elsevier

Drug Discovery Today

Volume 13, Issues 23–24, December 2008, Pages 1099-1106
Drug Discovery Today

Review
Post screen
The targeted delivery of cancer drugs across the blood–brain barrier: chemical modifications of drugs or drug-nanoparticles?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2008.09.005Get rights and content

One of the most challenging problems, if not the most challenging, in drug development is not to develop drugs to treat diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), but to manage to distribute them to the CNS across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) using transvascular routes following intravenous administration. The development of BBB targeting technologies is a very active field of research and development. One goal is to develop chemically modified derivatives of drugs or chemically modified nanoparticulate vectors of drugs, capable of crossing biological barriers, in particular the BBB. This manuscript will review the approaches that have been explored to achieve these goals, using chemical functionalization of drugs or of drug vector systems and endogenous transporters at the BBB.

Introduction

The treatment of brain cancers is limited by the inadequacy in delivering therapeutic agents in such a way that drug molecules reach the desired targets. In order to achieve efficient treatments of central nervous system (CNS) cancers, it is necessary to transport therapeutic agents across the specialized vascular system of the brain, the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which can present formidable challenges. These include the definition of the properties of the cerebral vascular system during cancer progression and the development of biotechnology to prepare biomarker-targeted delivery of multiple therapeutic agents, coupled to the possibility of avoiding various resistance mechanisms. A great deal of effort, therefore, is presently focused on improving CNS bioavailability, and tumors thereof, of therapeutic drugs that can be specifically targeted to diseased tissue, improving therapeutic opportunities, efficiency, and patient survival, while decreasing side-effects to normal cells.

The vast majority of presently used therapies for cancer capitalize on the faster rate of replication of tumor than normal cells. Most solid tumors also possess unique features and defects of their associated vasculature, such as extensive angiogenesis, defective vascular architecture, and increased vascular permeability, all of which can be used for delivering therapeutics. Devices, such as functionalized drug colloidal carriers, can take advantage of these features and act as vehicles to deliver, selectively and specifically, anti-cancer drugs to tissues, either using passive mechanisms relying on increased vascular permeability in a defined location, or using active targeting of chemically modified drugs or nanoparticles. Alternatively, direct modification and/or functionalization of drugs, involving the chemical conjugation of drugs to disease-targeting biological markers, can be used to achieve direct active targeting of drugs.

In this manuscript, the attempts that have been made to use either chemical modifications of drugs or the development of drug-nanoparticulate systems to reach these objectives will be reviewed and their advantages and drawbacks discussed, to define what should be the chemical, biophysical, and biological characteristics of an optimized system.

Section snippets

The blood–brain barrier (BBB), brain cancers, and therapeutic options and problems

The BBB is a system of vascular cellular structures, mainly represented by tight junctions between endothelial cells, and an ensemble of enzymes, receptors, transporters, and efflux pumps of the multidrug resistance (MDR) pathways (Figure 1) (reviewed in references 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) that control and limit the access of molecules to the brain, either by paracellular or transcellular pathways. Since the vascular density in the brain is very high, once molecules have penetrated the BBB, they

Drugs targeting brain cancers across the blood–brain barrier: chemical functionalization of therapeutic agents or of nanoparticulate carriers?

As previously stated, the limiting factor in the treatment of brain cancers is the delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain across the BBB. A very restricted number of liposoluble small molecules (MW < 400 Da) cross the BBB by free diffusion. All the other molecules must use specific systems to be transported across the BBB (for a more detailed review see reference [5] and scheme of Figure 1). Therefore, the future for treatment of malignant brain cancers relies on the development of therapies

Conclusions

A few strategies exist to enhance transport of anti-cancer agents across the BBB for the treatment of high-grade brain tumors: (i) passive permeation of lipidated drugs, however, this strategy is possible only for small molecules; (ii) the development of pro-drugs hijacking the transport mechanisms at the BBB, however, the high selectivity of these transport mechanisms limits this approach; (iii) the development of drug-loaded nanocarriers able to take advantage of any disruption of the BBB at

References (58)

  • K.B. Lee

    Surface modification of poly(glycolic acid) (PGA) for biomedical applications

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2003)
  • G.M. Dubowchik et al.

    Receptor-mediated and enzyme-dependent targeting of cytotoxic anticancer drugs

    Pharm. Ther.

    (1999)
  • Y. Jallouli

    Influence of surface charge and inner composition of porous nanoparticles to cross blood–brain barrier in vitro

    Int. J. Pharmaceutics

    (2007)
  • W. Lu

    Brain delivery property and accelerated blood clearance of cationic albumin conjugated pegylated nanoparticle

    J. Control. Release

    (2007)
  • F. Umezawa et al.

    Liposomes targeting to mouse brain: mannose as a recognition marker

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.

    (1988)
  • P.R. Lockman

    Brain uptake of thiamine-coated nanoparticles

    J. Control. Release

    (2003)
  • B. Petri

    Chemotherapy of brain tumour using doxorubicin bound to surfactant-coated poly(butyl cynoacrylate) nanoparticles. Revisiting the role of surfactants

    J. Control. Rel.

    (2007)
  • I. Brigger

    Negative preclinical results with stealth® nanospheres-encapsulated doxorubicin in an orthopic murine brain tumor model

    J. Control. Rel.

    (2004)
  • R.S. Tu et al.

    Bottom-up design of biomimetic assemblies

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2004)
  • D.J. Begley et al.

    Structural and functional aspects of the blood–brain barrier

    Prog. Drug Res.

    (2003)
  • Y. Persidsky

    Blood–brain barrier: structural components and function under physiologic and pathologic conditions

    J. Neuroimm. Pharm.

    (2006)
  • J.F. Deeken et al.

    The blood–brain barrier and cancer: transporters, treatment, and Trojan horses

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2007)
  • G. Lee

    Drug transporters in the central nervous system: brain barriers and brain parenchyma

    Pharm. Rev.

    (2001)
  • S. Dallas

    Multidrug resistance-associated proteins: expression and function in the central nervous system

    Pharm. Rev.

    (2006)
  • L.L. Muldoon

    Chemotherapy delivery issues in central nervous system malignancy: a reality check

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2008)
  • F.M. Boyle

    Penetration of intra-arterially administered vincristine in experimental brain tumor

    Neuro-oncology

    (2004)
  • R. Stupp

    Chemioradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2007)
  • W.M. Pardridge

    Blood–brain barrier drug targeting: the future of brain drug development

    Mol. Interv.

    (2003)
  • N. Mizuno

    Impact of drug transporter studies on drug discovery and development

    Pharmacol. Rev. 2003

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text