Elsevier

Physica Medica

Volume 24, Issue 2, June 2008, Pages 71-79
Physica Medica

Invited paper
Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.01.012Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper reviews current technical approaches to the optimisation of CT practice, i.e. approaches to reduce patient dose to the necessary minimum. The most important step towards this goal appears to be the technology of tube current modulation (TCM), which came into practice in the early 2000s and has become the standard approach recently. Anatomy- or attenuation-based TCM allows for a dose reduction between 10 and 60% as compared to scans with constant tube current. Automatic exposure control (AEC) approaches are the next step; based on TCM technology, AEC adapts the tube current both with the rotation angle α (α-modulation) and along the z-axis (z-modulation) to achieve a pre-selected image quality level at minimal dose. To pre-select the image quality level, i.e. primarily the pixel noise level, tools for simulation are important to investigate the necessary noise levels pro- and retrospectively for given cases and diagnostic tasks. Respective “dose tutor” approaches have become available recently and are presented. The most recent technical innovation which may lead to substantial dose reduction is the investigation of optimal spectra taking the type of contrast and 3D dose distributions into account. A high potential has been shown especially for pediatric CT and for thoracic CT where dose reduction of a factor of 2 and more is possible when using reduced tube voltages.

Introduction

In the 1980s, X-ray computed tomography (CT) was considered a mature technique which had reached its peak. And it was expected at the time that it would soon be replaced completely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This expectation also reflected the general desire that patient exposure to ionizing radiation should be reduced or omitted completely whenever diagnostic alternatives were present. This followed the ALARA (“as low as reasonably achievable”) principle [1] which is the background and motivation for the work reported below.

As is well known today, CT is still around. The introduction of spiral CT in the late 1980s [2] led to a renaissance of CT and to renewed investments in CT technology, in particular to the development of array detectors. Four-slice acquisition systems became available in 1998, followed by 16-slice and 64-slice systems in 2001 and 2004, respectively. The combination with rotation times being reduced from 1 s in 1990 to 0.3–0.4 s today have led to a remarkable increase in technical performance [3]. Whole body scanning in 10–30 s at isotropic resolution levels of 0.4–0.6 mm, CT angiography in a few seconds and cardiac CT and coronary CT angiography with temporal resolution of 0.1–0.3 s are routine today. This resulted in the re-establishment of CT as currently the most important diagnostic modality in radiology and, in consequence, the frequency of CT examinations increased continuously over the past years [3], [4], [5]. Not surprisingly, concern about increasing patient dose grew in synchrony with the increasing use of CT.

It is a fact that CT today is the single modality which contributes 50% and more to the per capita exposure of the population from medical use of ionizing radiation [6], [7]. This is due to the increasing number of examinations. It is not true, however, that the CT dose per examination increased. Quite the contrary, it has stayed relatively stable or, as shown in several examinations and studies, the average dose decreased. For Germany the average effective dose per CT examination today is quoted at 10 mSv [6].

Nevertheless, there is high motivation and great endeavour to reduce doses resulting from CT examinations further on, and there are many organisations and agencies which encourage respective efforts. The European Union, for example, supported and still supports these goals and initiated respective research within their framework program 6 (FP6). Essential parts of the work presented in this paper were supported by a major FP6 grant as a multi-center project under the title “Safety and efficacy of computed tomography: a broad perspective” [8]. A complete overview on the project was given in a special symposium at the X European Congress of Medical Physics in Castelvecchio, Italy, in September 2007 and can be reviewed on the consortium's website www.msct.eu.

One selected symposium presentation reviewed technical approaches to the optimisation of patient dose in CT and is summarized in this article. The focus is on four recent developments which are considered the most significant and presented in the next four subchapters. Fortunately there is no limitation to further creative or simply professional developments such as optimisation of X-ray filtration, the development of better collimation schemes or more efficient detector systems with respect to both absorption and geometric efficiency. It is the authors' conviction that, based on all these developments, the dose per patient examination can be reduced significantly further on.

Section snippets

Tube current modulation (TCM)

Until 1990s the X-ray tube current was kept constant during data acquisition for all CT examinations. Early CT practice was limited to scanning the head in a water bath; accordingly there was no necessity for modulation of the tube current since attenuation was approximately the same for all projection angles. This simple dogma was not questioned or changed later when body CT became available, and there was no technology available for fast adaptation of the tube current. The topic and its

Automatic exposure control (AEC)

TCM commonly applies to a 360° scan and aims to distribute the total number of photons or the mAs product, respectively, as a function of the rotation angle α in an optimal fashion to reduce dose. Accordingly we call it α-modulation. Image quality is kept constant for the given slice, but is not the primary concern. For automatic exposure control image quality is the focus: the primary aim is to ensure a pre-selected noise level throughout the scan region. Thereby AEC is concerned about the

Determination of optimal noise levels

The question “Which mAs level is adequate?” is the first question asked when considering noise levels. The literature offers an abundance of papers on the topic [4]. What is mostly missing is the comparability between different scanners and, even more important, taking the influence of spatial resolution into account. Soft-tissue imaging is done adequately with smooth reconstruction filters which limit spatial resolution but also reduce noise while bone, lung and high-resolution imaging in

Determination of the optimal energy

From the beginning of clinical CT practice in the early 1970s, comparatively little attention has been given to the optimisation of the choice of X-ray energy. The most common setting of 120 kV was somehow given from the start. The reason behind this seemingly was and still is the availability of the respective X-ray technology. Standard X-ray tubes are limited to voltages below 150 kV, and the X-ray generators are adapted to this. High energies are desirable to have high penetration; just the

Conclusions

The use of CT in clinical practice has increased over the past years and will most likely continue to increase. It has to be considered beneficial for the patient since advanced diagnostic procedures and new indications are given. Nevertheless, the exposure per capita will increase and intensified efforts to limit or to reduce patient dose are demanded.

Considerable progress has been made over the last years in that direction. Except for cardiac CT, there are indications that the dose per

Acknowledgements

Considerable parts of the work presented here were supported by a European Union FP6 grant [8]; we gratefully acknowledge this support. The possibility to do measurements at 60 kV was made available by Siemens Medical Solutions by a scanner modification. We are grateful for this special effort which made the experimental verification of spectral optimisation at low voltage values possible.

References (25)

  • International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)

    1990 Recommendations of the ICRP

    Ann ICRP

    (1991)
  • W.A. Kalender et al.

    Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation

    Radiology

    (1990)
  • W.A. Kalender

    Computed tomography. Fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications

    (2005)
  • M. Prokop et al.

    Ganzkörper-Computertomographie. Spiral- und Multislice-CT

    (2007)
  • E. Fishman et al.

    Spiral-CT

    (2003)
  • BFS. Umweltradioaktivität und Strahlenbelastung im Jahr 2003. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und...
  • G. Brix et al.

    Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey

    Eur Radiol

    (2003)
  • Euratom FP6 project: safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT): a broad perspective (2005–2007) AZ:...
  • L. Kopka et al.

    Anatomisch adaptierte Varation des Röhrenstroms bei der CT. Untersuchungen zur Strahlendosisreduktion und Bildqualität

    RöFo

    (1995)
  • S.M. Giacomuzzi et al.

    Das “Smart-Scan”-Verfahren der Spiral-Computertomographie: Eine neue Methode der Dosisreduktion

    Fortschr Röntgenstr

    (1996)
  • M. Gies et al.

    Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies

    Med Phys

    (1999)
  • W.A. Kalender et al.

    Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers

    Eur Radiol

    (1999)
  • Cited by (180)

    • An assessment of Sri Lankan radiographer's knowledge and awareness of radiation protection and imaging parameters related to patient dose and image quality in computed tomography (CT)

      2022, Radiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      The practice of the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle is essential to reduce the radiation risk in CT imaging.6 The ALARA principle helps to retain the balance between the image quality and patient dose to avoid unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation during CT imaging.7 Three principles of radiation protection achieve it; Justification, dose optimization, and dose limitation must be followed in each CT scan to ensure better image quality without unnecessary patient exposure.8

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text