Nasopharyngeal cancer: Impact of skull base invasion on patients prognosis and its potential implications on TNM staging
Introduction
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is unique in its prevalence in China, being common in southern China compared to other regions. Because of its deep and hidden anatomical location, the infiltrating ability of the tumor, and the non-specific nature of symptoms, NPC is not diagnosed until it has reached an advanced stage [1]. NPC usually originates in the lateral wall of the nasopharynx and can then extend to the other lateral wall, posterosuperiorly to the base of the skull or the palate, nasal cavity or oropharynx.
Skull base invasion may affect 25–63% of patients with NPC [2], [3], [4]. Skull base invasion represents one of the poor prognostic factors in NPC, and hence accurate evaluation of skull base invasion is needed, when present [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. The recent (7th edition) American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union for Cancer Control update on the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) cancer staging designates [12], skull base and/or paranasal sinus invasion without cranial nerve (CN) deficits as stage T3. This classification has become effective for cancers diagnosed on or after January 1, 2010. There might still be scope to offer evidence to further modify this classification.
It has been reported that 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT play important roles in the staging, treatment planning, and detecting local recurrence of NPC [13], [14]. However, 18F-FDG PET/CT lacks sensitivity for the T staging of locally advanced NPC, especially in the delineation of skull base and intracranial erosion compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [15], [16]. In recent studies on NPC, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be better than other imaging modalities for evaluation of tumor invasion as the technique offers ideal soft tissue contrast and multi-planar imaging capability [17], [18]. With gadolinium contrast and fat suppression sequences, it has greater sensitivity and specificity over other imaging methods in detecting skull-base invasion and perineural invasion.
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze MRI findings and clinical reports of patients with NPC with skull-base invasion, and stage their tumors (T stage) into three groups according to their anatomic sites and assess their prognostic value. We hoped that this analysis might play a role in deciding an optimal treatment course.
Section snippets
Patient characteristics
This study was retrospectively designed. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study, and informed consent was obtained from all patients or their next of kin.
From December 2002 to January 2005, 838 consecutive patients (641 men [mean age: 45.8 years; age range: 13–76 years], 197 women [mean age: 41.7 years; age range: 20–75 years]) with newly-biopsy proved, untreated, and non-disseminated NPC were enrolled in our study. Patients with additional, known head-and-neck cancers
Incidence and distribution of skull base erosions
Five hundred and forty-nine of the 838 patients with NPC (65.51%) met with our study inclusion criteria for skull base erosion on MRI. The most common site of bone invasion was the base of the sphenoid bone (511/549, 93.08%), followed by the base of pterygoid process (358/549, 65.21%). The grades (high, medium, and low) of the skull base invasion according to their anatomic site, and incidence are detailed in Table 1.
Comparison of T-stage among three groups
In the high group, T category distribution was as follows: T3 lesions, 190
Patterns of skull base invasion
Multiple earlier studies have reported that skull base erosion may be seen in 25–63% of cases [2], [3], [4], [19], [25]. Our analysis indicated the incidence of skull base invasion to be 65.51% (549/838), which is much higher. This may be because some of the earlier studies were based on CT scanning, and MRI was done without the use of fat saturation techniques, unlike the sensitive method used in our study cohort.
In our study, the high group (≥35%) included the base of the sphenoid bone,
Conclusions
In conclusion, the results of this retrospective analysis indicate that medium and low groups displayed similar findings of skull base invasion, and survival status. We, therefore, propose that patients in these two groups be grouped under T4 in the TNM classification that might have a bearing in implementing optimum treatment.
Author contribution
Yi-Zhuo Li, Pei-Qiang Cai, Pei-Hong Wu carried out the studies, participated in the sequence and drafted the manuscript. Chuan-Miao Xie, Zi-Lin Huang, Ci-Yong lu, Yao-Pai Wu participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. Yi-Zhuo Li, Li-Zhi Liu, Guo-Yi Zhang and Rui Zhong conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Acknowledgements
We thank our colleagues in the department of medical records and the institutional review board, who provided the follow-up data and approved this study.
References (28)
- et al.
Undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer (UCNT): current diagnostic and therapeutic aspects
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
(1995) - et al.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with skull base invasion: a necessity of staging subdivision
American Journal of Otolaryngology
(2004) - et al.
Carcinoma of the nasopharynx: factors affecting prognosis
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
(1992) - et al.
Significant prognosticators after primary radiotherapy in 903 nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma evaluated by computer tomography
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
(1996) - et al.
Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of local and regional control
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
(1997) - et al.
Important prognostic factors in patients with skull base erosion from nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
(2001) - et al.
Prediction of prognosis using standardized uptake value of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography for nasopharyngeal carcinomas
Radiotherapy and Oncology
(2008) - et al.
Prediction for distant failure in patients with stage M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the role of standardized uptake value
Oral Oncology
(2009) - et al.
Prognostic features and treatment outcome in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma following concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
(1998) - et al.
Skull base erosion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: detection by CT and MRI
Clinical Radiology
(1996)
Skull-base invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging findings and therapeutic implications
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Extension of local disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma detected by magnetic resonance imaging: improvement of clinical target volume delineation
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Perineural invasion of the trigeminal nerve in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Imaging and clinical correlations
Cancer
MRI of local disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: tumour extent vs tumour stage
British Journal of Radiology
Cited by (22)
MiR196a-5p in extracellular vesicles released from human nasopharyngeal carcinoma enhance the phagocytosis and secretion of microglia by targeting ROCK1
2022, Experimental Cell ResearchCitation Excerpt :Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant head and neck cancer prevalent in southeast Asia; the incidence of NPC is approximately 30 cases per 100,000 persons in southern China [15,16]. In NPC, tumor invasion of the skull base affects 25–63% of patients and is considered a major factor involved with the poor prognosis of NPC [15,17,18]. Indeed, the presence of an intracranial extension is considered the worst prognostic factor in NPC patients who present with skull base invasion [19].
MR Imaging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
2022, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Spread to the prevertebral muscles in the retropharynx can be subtle or bulky providing the main route of inferior spread. Skull base invasion is common (approximately 65%)5,32 and may be the only site of invasion outside the nasopharynx (Figs. 4–7). The skull base should be assessed systematically at the most common sites of invasion, which comprise six bony sites (clivus, right and left pterygoid processes, right and left petrous apices, and body of the sphenoid, especially the floor of the sphenoid sinus); three foramina (rotundum, ovale, and lacerum); three canals (vidian, pterygopalatine, and hypoglossal); three fissures (pterygomaxillary, orbital, and petroclival); and one fossa (pterygopalatine fossa).
Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on the 8th edition of the ajcc/uicc staging system
2019, Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: From Etiology to Clinical PracticeLocoregional extension and patterns of failure for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intracranial extension
2018, Oral OncologyCitation Excerpt :Skull-base invasion was diagnosed using the following criteria: (a) a defect in the low signal intensity of the bone cortex on T1-weighted image and (b) high signal intensity marrow replacement by low signal intensity tissue on T1-weighted image (an obvious enhancement in the enhanced scan). The criterion for MRI involvement of the cavernous sinus was a change in contour or enlargement of the sinus [9,10]. Lymph node (LN) involvement diagnosis was based on one or more of the following radiological criteria [11]: (a) lateral retropharyngeal lymph node with a minimal axial diameter (MID) in the largest plane of an individual node at least 5 mm and any node seen in the median retropharyngeal group, lymph nodes with a MID of at least 11 mm in the jugulodigastric region and 10 mm for all other cervical nodes, excluding the retropharyngeal group; (b) lymph nodes of any size with central necrosis or a contrast-enhancing rim; (c) the presence of three or more contiguous and confluent lymph nodes, each of which should have a MID of 8 or more; and (d) lymph nodes of any size with extracapsular spread, including the presence of indistinct nodal margins, irregular nodal capsular enhancement or infiltration into the adjacent fat or muscle.
Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma - The past, the present and the future
2014, Oral OncologyCitation Excerpt :Due to the increasing use of MRI and PET-CT as a diagnostic and staging tool, apart from its effects on stage migration, various sub-classifications have been proposed based on new information made available with these imaging findings. There are two studies that suggest classifying patients with different extent of skull base involvement into different T3 sub-categories [16] or even upstaging those with most extensive involvement as a T4 disease [17], and one study that suggest classifying patients with different extent of intracranial extension involvement into different T4 sub-categories [18], but more than 80% of patients in these studies were treated by two-dimensional RT (2DRT), the relevance in intensity modulated RT (IMRT) era was uncertain, and it is quite unlikely that such sub-categorization could offer substantial help in guiding treatment decision. The most ambiguous term among the defining criteria is ‘masticatory space’.
Prognostic potential of a voxelwise invasion risk map of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on a coordinate system of the nasopharynx
2023, Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
- 1
These two authors contributed equally to this study.