Review
Covered stents: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.04.083Get rights and content

Abstract

Stents are the most important advance for percutaneous coronary revascularization. After introduction of drug eluting stents, in-stent restenosis ist not more a major problem of coronary intervention. However, restenosis by bare metal stents, peripheral embolism following stent implationtan in old vein grafts, and conditions in which there is a discontinuity of the coronary lumen (rupture or perforation, aneurysm, and fistula) remain a problem in interventional therapy. Stent grafts with integration of a membrane into a coronary stent represent an interesting concept to possibly prevent intraluminal proliferation, to seal degenerated vein grafts, and to cover coronary artery perforations, symptomatic aneurysms, and fistula with high success and acceptable rates of acute complications. We presents case reports and a review article.

Introduction

Stents are the most important advance for percutaneous coronary revascularization. After introduction of drug eluting stents, in-stent restenosis is not more a major problem of coronary intervention. However, restenosis by bare metal stents, peripheral embolism following stent implantation in old vein grafts, and conditions in which there is a discontinuity of the coronary lumen (rupture or perforation, aneurysm, and fistula) remain a problem in interventional therapy. Stent grafts with integration of a membrane into a coronary stent represent an interesting concept to possibly prevent intraluminal proliferation, to seal degenerated vein grafts, and to cover coronary artery perforations, symptomatic aneurysms, and fistula with high success and acceptable rates of acute complications [1].

Section snippets

History of development

The advent of coronary stents led to a dramatic reduction in procedure-related complications (e.g., acute closure) and markedly improved long-term outcome. Nonetheless, percutaneous interventions with bare metal stents are still limited by the persistent problem of restenosis. Depending on stent geometry, tissue prolapse through the metal mesh may contribute to restenosis, yet the predominant mechanism of in-stent restenosis is neointimal proliferation. The wall injury inherent to any coronary

Coronary perforation

Coronary artery perforation is an infrequent but well-recognized complication of percutaneous transluminal interventions, reported to occur in 0.1%–3.0% of endovascular interventions. Oversized balloons, high inflation pressures, stiff guide wires, and debulking devices are likely to be causal factors resulting in potential life-threatening complications such as hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, and myocardial infarction [7].

Other risk factors are calcified, tortuous and non-compliant

References (53)

  • H. Rikimaru et al.

    Saccular renal artery aneurysm treated with an autologous vein-covered stent

    J Vasc Surg

    (2001)
  • J.H. Rundback et al.

    Percutaneous stent-graft management of renal artery aneurysms

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2000)
  • G. Butera et al.

    Covered stents in patients with complex aortic coarctations

    Am Heart J

    (2007)
  • J.T. McPhee et al.

    The midterm results of stent graft treatment of thoracic aortic injuries

    J Surg Res.

    (2007)
  • V. Schachinger et al.

    A randomized trial of polytetrafluoroethylene membrane covered stents compared with conventional stents in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • S. Storger et al.

    Polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents: indications, advantages, and limitations

    J Interv Cardiol

    (1999)
  • C. Stefanidis et al.

    Stents wrapped in autologous vein: an experimental study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1996)
  • C. Stefanidis et al.

    autologous vein graft-coated stents for the treatment of thrombus-containing coronary artery lesions

    Cath Cardiovasc Diagn

    (1997)
  • C. Stefanidis et al.

    Total reconstruction of a diseased saphenous vein graft by means of conventional and autologous tissue-coated stents

    Cath Cardiovasc Diagn

    (1998)
  • U. Gercken et al.

    Results of the Jostent coronary stent graft implantation in various clinical settings: procedural and follow-up results

    Cath Cardiovasc Inter

    (2002)
  • C. Briguori et al.

    Emergency polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation to treat coronary ruptures

    Circulation

    (2000)
  • R. Albiero et al.

    Left internal mammary artery graft perforation repair using polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents

    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

    (2000)
  • D.R. Ramsdale et al.

    Repair of coronary artery perforation after rotastenting by implantation of the Jostent covered stent

    Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn

    (1998)
  • C. Von Birgelen et al.

    Early clinical experience with the implantation of a novel synthetic coronary stent graft

    Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn

    (1999)
  • A. Colombo et al.

    Successful closure of a coronary vessel rupture with a vein graft stent: case report

    Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn

    (1996)
  • Z. Elghoul et al.

    Iatrogenic fistula between the left anterior descending coronary artery and anterior interventricular vein following stenting

    J Invasive Cardiol

    (2007)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Coronary bypass graft perforation during percutaneous intervention

      2016, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
    • Preventing in-stent restenosis using lipoprotein (a), lipid and cholesterol adsorbent materials

      2015, Medical Hypotheses
      Citation Excerpt :

      The covered stents are still undergoing under development in design as well as materials used. A covered stent is a stent which is covered by a thin sleeve membrane such as PTFE [5], PET [6], PU [7], POSS-PCU [8], PVA [9] and chitosan [5], that can have positive effects like reduce incidence of ISR; and it also could be a carrier for drugs. In-stent restenosis is a major drawback of stent implantation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text