Clinical Investigation
Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Velocity in Predicting Head-and-Neck Cancer Outcomes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.022Get rights and content

Purpose

We previously showed that metabolic tumor volume (MTV) on positron emission tomography—computed tomography (PET-CT) predicts for disease recurrence and death in head-and-neck cancer (HNC). We hypothesized that increases in MTV over time would correlate with tumor growth and biology, and would predict outcome. We sought to examine tumor growth over time in serial pretreatment PET-CT scans.

Methods and Materials

From 2006 to 2009, 51 patients had two PET-CT scans before receiving HNC treatment. MTV was defined as the tumor volume ≥50% of maximum SUV (SUVmax). MTV was calculated for the primary tumor, nodal disease, and composite (primary tumor + nodes). MTV and SUV velocity were defined as the change in MTV or SUVmax over time, respectively. Cox regression analyses were used to examine correlations between SUV, MTV velocity, and outcome (disease progression and overall survival).

Results

The median follow-up time was 17.5 months. The median time between PET-CT scans was 3 weeks. Unexpectedly, 51% of cases demonstrated a decrease in SUVmax (average, −0.1 cc/week) and MTV (average, −0.3 cc/week) over time. Despite the variability in MTV, primary tumor MTV velocity predicted disease progression (hazard ratio 2.94; p = 0.01) and overall survival (hazard ratio 1.85; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Primary tumor MTV velocity appears to be a better prognostic indicator of disease progression and survival in comparison to nodal MTV velocity. However, substantial variability was found in PET-CT biomarkers between serial scans. Caution should be used when PET-CT biomarkers are integrated into clinical protocols for HNC.

Introduction

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has been increasingly used for staging, radiotherapy target definition, and determining treatment response in head-and-neck cancers (HNC) 1, 2, 3. When combined with computed tomography (CT) imaging, PET-CT has an improved sensitivity and specificity compared with standard CT or magnetic resonance imaging 4, 5, 6.

Differential FDG uptake between tumor cells and normal tissue measured via maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is an independent prognostic factor in several HNC subsites 7, 8, 9. We recently reported on a more functional preradiation PET-CT measurement tool, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), which quantifies the metabolic tumor burden. Pretreatment MTV predicted for disease progression and survival in HNC, whereas SUVmax did not (10). We also showed that postradiation MTV is a prognostic factor in HNC (11). These findings suggest that metabolic tumor burden may be a stronger independent prognostic factor than SUV 12, 13, 14, 15.

Presumably, HNC increases in size and metabolic activity over time. The rate of growth should correlate with tumor biology, with faster-growing tumors intuitively being more aggressive and fatal. The anatomic and functional imaging characteristics of PET-CT make it an excellent candidate to capture tumor growth rate, which has not been evaluated in HNC. The purpose of this study was to examine tumor growth over time without any intervening treatment, measured with SUVmax and MTV in serial preradiation PET-CT scans.

Section snippets

Patients

After Institutional Review Board approval, we reviewed the medical records of HNC patients treated with definitive radiation at Stanford University (June 2006 through November 2009). Patients with two pre-radiotherapy PET-CT scans without treatment between the two scans were included. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: distant metastatic disease at diagnosis; prior definitive surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy; or salivary gland, paranasal sinus, thyroid, or skin primary

PET-CT velocity

The median time between PET-CT scans was 3.0 weeks (range, 6 days to 10.7 weeks). Of the first PET-CT scans, the median primary tumor SUVmax was 11.2 (range, 2.8–53), and the median nodal SUVmax was 10.4 (range, 0–49). The median primary tumor MTV was 4.5 cc (range, 0.5–35 cc), and the median nodal MTV was 5.9 cc (range, 0.7–29 cc). Figure 1 demonstrates the change in SUV and MTV over time. We observed significant variability between each patient’s two PET-CT scans. One would expect SUV and MTV

Discussion

Neither SUVmax nor MTV measured on serial PET-CT scans adequately captured tumor progression over time. Our results did not support the intuitive concept that HNC tumors increase in size and metabolic activity over time. As we move toward risk-adapted therapy, there will be interest in integrating PET-CT as a risk-stratifying biomarker and the incorporation of serial FDG PET-CT scans to assess treatment response. Here, we highlight potential limitations in serial PET-CT reproducibility. The

References (28)

  • R.S. Rodrigues et al.

    Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

    J Nucl Med

    (2009)
  • A.S. Allal et al.

    Standardized uptake value of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in predicting outcome in head and neck carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2002)
  • H. Minn et al.

    Prediction of survival with fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose and PET in head and neck cancer

    J Nucl Med

    (1997)
  • S.H. Hyun et al.

    Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2010)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Integrating Tumor and Nodal Imaging Characteristics at Baseline and Mid-Treatment Computed Tomography Scans to Predict Distant Metastasis in Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

      2019, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In future work, it may be worth exploring the utility of CBCT for early response evaluation. Beyond CT imaging, magnetic resonance and fluorodeoxyglucose-PET imaging have also shown prognostic value in head and neck cancer.35-41 It may be beneficial to combine CT with PET imaging to further improve the accuracy of prediction in future.

    • Cancer of the Head and Neck

      2019, Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology
    • CT-based volumetric tumor growth velocity: A novel imaging prognostic indicator in oropharyngeal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy

      2016, Oral Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The metabolic tumor volumes were defined as the tumor volume that was greater than or equal to 50% of maximum standardized uptake value. They found that increased MTV significantly predicted risk of disease progression, cancer-specific mortality, and overall risk of death [14]. As in our study, Chu et al. did not find that metabolic nodal velocity was significantly correlated with outcomes.

    • PET-based radiation therapy planning

      2015, PET Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      These findings were also seen in studies by Murphy and colleagues92 and Tang and colleagues.93 Another study by Chu and colleagues94 suggests that when the MTV tumor volume is assessed on serial PET/CT scans before RT initiation, the calculated MTV tumor velocity (absolute change in MTV/time in weeks) was predictive of disease-free survival and overall survival. There has also been work correlating the pathologic tumor volume on surgical specimens from postoperative patients who have H&N cancer with the imaging-defined volume.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    K. P. Chu and J. D. Murphy contributed equally to this study.

    Supported in part by R01-CA118582-04 (Q.T.L., E.E.G.), and by 5P01-CA67166-15 (Q.T.L., E.E.G.).

    Conflict of interest: none.

    View full text