Study of carotid arterial plaque stress for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients
Introduction
Atherosclerosis is one of the leading causes of death all over the world, caused by plaque rupture and subsequent thrombus formation (Rosamond et al., 2007). Despite many years of research, the underlying mechanism for plaque rupture is still not fully understood (Naghavi et al., 2003). It is believed that several factors play important roles in the rupture process: (a) biological abnormalities, such as enhanced inflammatory activity, and the accumulation of macrophages (Libby et al., 2002); (b) biomechanical factors, such as local extreme mechanical stress (Cheng et al., 1993, Lee et al., 1993, Ohayon et al., 2001, Richardson et al., 1989). With recent development of imaging techniques and the improved understanding of plaque rupture mechanisms, it is increasingly becoming clear that plaque vulnerability cannot be described by the degree of stenosis alone (Giroud et al., 1992). It has been suggested that plaque morphology, plaque biomechanical environment, and inflammation activity will all influence their vulnerability (Richardson, 2002, Naghavi and Libby, 2003, Ohayon et al., 2008). From biomechanical aspect, the rupture can be considered to be a mechanical failure event. Therefore it is useful to study the detailed mechanical stress distribution on specific plaques in order to develop a more precise assessment of the risk of plaque rupture (Zheng et al., 2005, Li et al., 2006).
Patient specific plaque stress analysis has been providing critical information on the understanding of plaque rupture mechanisms and may eventually lead to rupture risk assessment (Tang et al., 2005a). Recent developments in high-resolution multi-spectral MRI have allowed plaque components to be visualized in-vivo (Hatsukami et al., 2000, Cai et al., 2002, Yuan et al., 2002), providing more realistic plaque geometries for stress analysis (Touze et al., 2007, Gao et al., 2009a). Based on 2D in-vivo MRI, Li et al. (2007) found that stress in asymptomatic patients was lower than that in symptomatic patients. Stress analysis by fluid structure interaction (FSI) has gained popularity for providing more realistic results recently (Tang et al., 2004). Gao et al. (2009b) studied carotid plaque stress distribution using FSI based on in-vivo MR images from 4 patients, and a risk assessment was made from the analysis. Based on 12 carotid plaques, Tang et al. (2009) compared plaque stress between a group of 5 ruptured plaques and 7 un-ruptured plaques using FSI methods. They found that stress in the rupture sites was significantly higher than in the surrounding region; the mean critical principal wall stress was significantly higher in the ruptured group than in the non-ruptured group, which may provide important evidence for plaque rupture induced by high mechanical stress.
In this study, we report our latest result of plaque stress analysis on a larger group of 20 patients in which 12 were symptomatic and 8 were asymptomatic. The 20 carotid plaque models were reconstructed from in-vivo MR images. The fully coupled FSI simulation was performed on each patient, and followed by a detailed stress analysis. Plaque wall stress and related morphological features were compared between the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Section snippets
MR image acquisition
Patient selection and image acquisition were performed by investigators who were not involved in the stress analysis. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient before the study. In-vivo multi-spectral MRI scanning was performed on 20 non-consecutive individuals (12 symptomatic and 8 asymptomatic) recruited from a specialist neurovascular clinic. The baseline information regarding the two groups can be found in Table 1.
Examples of stress distribution for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients
Wall tensile stress is widely believed to be an important factor to trigger the rupture of the thin fibrous cap. The first principal stress (FPS) is the strongest stretching stress component and can be used to represent the wall tensile stress. Fig. 2 show examples of pressure and plaque wall stress distribution of a symptomatic (Fig. 2(a)) and an asymptomatic (Fig. 2(b)) patient at the end of systole phase. The upper panels (Fig. 2(a1), (b1)) show the pressure distributions in the luminal
Discussion
With anatomically realistic plaque geometry, FSI simulation is able to provide detailed stress analysis (Gao et al., 2009b, Tang et al., 2009). According to Li et al.'s (2007) 2D stress analysis study based on in-vivo MR images of 30 patients, the stress in asymptomatic patients was lower than that in symptomatic patients (269.6±107.9 kPa vs. 508.2±193.1 kPa). Our 3D stress analysis confirmed the conclusion that the maximum stress in the symptomatic group was significantly higher than that in the
Conclusion
Fully coupled FSI simulation was performed on 20 carotid plaques reconstructed from high resolution in-vivo MR images. Extreme stress conditions were found in the fibrous cap, mostly at the plaque shoulder region in the studied subjects. Local maximum stress values predicted in the plaque region were found to be significantly higher in symptomatic patients than that in asymptomatic patients, and plaque wall stress level defined by FPS95 was also much higher in symptomatic patients. Although
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest with any other individual or Government in the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the British Heart Foundation (FS/06/048).
References (30)
- et al.
Carotid arterial plaque stress analysis using fluid-structure interactive simulation based on in-vivo magnetic resonance images of four patients
Journal of Biomechanics
(2009) - et al.
Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at proper angiography
American Journal of Cardiology
(1992) - et al.
Computational structural analysis based on intravascular ultrasound imaging before in vitro angioplasty: prediction of plaque rupture locations
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
(1993) - et al.
Stress analysis of carotid plaque rupture based on in vivo high resolution MRI
Journal of Biomechanics
(2006) - et al.
Structure analysis and magnetic resonance imaging predict plaque vulnerability: a study comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals
Journal of vascular surgery
(2007) - et al.
Influence of plaque configuration and stress distribution on fissuring of coronary atherosclerotic plaques
Lancet
(1989) - et al.
Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging
Circulation
(2002) - et al.
Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: a multifocal disease
Circulation
(2003) - et al.
Distribution of circumferential stress in ruptured and stable atherosclerotic lesions. A structural analysis with histopathological correction
Circulation
(1993) - et al.
Study of reproducibility of human arterial plaque reconstruction and its effects on stress analysis based on multispectral in vivo magnetic resonance imaging
Journal of Magnetic resonance imaging
(2009)
Plaque rupture in the carotid artery is localized at the high shear stress region: a case report
Stroke
Visualization of Fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging
Circulation
Characterization of the atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation using MRI, finite element modeling and histology
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Inflammation and atherosclerosis
Circulation
Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels
Circulation Research
Cited by (33)
Combining morphological and biomechanical factors for optimal carotid plaque progression prediction: An MRI-based follow-up study using 3D thin-layer models
2019, International Journal of CardiologyOn the axial distribution of plaque stress: Influence of stenosis severity, lipid core stiffness, lipid core length and fibrous cap stiffness
2019, Medical Engineering and Physics3D MRI-based multicomponent thin layer structure only plaque models for atherosclerotic plaques
2016, Journal of BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :Comparing to flow shear stress, plaque wall stress (PWS) might be a better predictor of carotid plaque rupture sites than flow shear stress, since PWS is typically around 103–105 times greater than wall shear stress (WSS) (Brown et al., 2016; Teng et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2014). It was found by several groups that higher PWS obtained from FSI models are linked to plaque rupture (Bluestein et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2009; Teng et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2014a). However, currently it is still very time-consuming to construct 3D FSI models due to the complex deformable plaque structure and the highly non-linear material properties.
The application of ultrasonic velocity vector imaging technique of carotid plaque in predicting large-artery atherosclerotic stroke
2015, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular DiseasesCitation Excerpt :As early as in the 1980s, Lusby et al suggested the role of mechanical stresses in carotid plaque progression and in the development of symptoms of cerebral ischemia.17-19 By now, various studies have shown that stress profile of stable plaques differs significantly from that of unstable plaque, and biomechanical structural stresses of carotid plaque are significantly associated with the development of subsequent cerebrovascular ischemic symptoms.20-25 But those studies were either studying specimen from patients who experienced carotid endarterectomy or magnetic resonance imaging–based biomechanical stress analysis by computational simulation.
The influence of computational strategy on prediction of mechanical stress in carotid atherosclerotic plaques: Comparison of 2D structure-only, 3D structure-only, one-way and fully coupled fluid-structure interaction analyses
2014, Journal of BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :Indeed, plaques with high mechanical stress concentrations are associated with fissuring in both coronary (Richardson et al., 1989) and carotid (Sadat et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2009b) plaques. As a consequence, many studies have tried to predict mechanical stress within the plaque structure (Bluestein et al., 2008; Kiousis et al., 2009; Kock et al., 2008; Leach et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2004; Tang et al., 2004), and to assess its clinical significance (Gao et al., 2011; Sadat et al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2010). However, atherosclerotic plaques are multi-component structures with irregular geometries and highly non-linear material properties, and plaques undergo large deformations due to pulsatile blood pressure; it is therefore challenging to predict mechanical loading within the structure.
- 1
Consultant surgeon.