Special article
The Role of MGMT Testing in Clinical Practice: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.05.011Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Recent advances in modern molecular technologies allow for the examination and measurement of cancer-related genomic changes. The number of molecular tests for evaluation of diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive markers is expected to increase. In recent years, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation has been firmly established as a biomarker in patients diagnosed with gliomas, for both clinical trials and routine clinical management. Similarly, molecular markers, such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for 1p/19q have already demonstrated clinical utility in treatment of oligodendroglial tumors, and others might soon show clinical utility. Furthermore, nonrandom associations are being discovered among MGMT, 1p/19q LOH, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, and other tumor-specific modifications that could possibly enhance our ability to predict outcome and response to therapy. While pathologists are facing new and more complicated requests for clinical genomic testing, clinicians are challenged with increasing numbers of molecular data coming from molecular pathology and genomic medicine. Both pathologists and oncologists need to understand the clinical utility of molecular tests and test results, including issues of turnaround time, and their impact on the application of targeted treatment regimens. This review summarizes the existing data that support the rationale for MGMT promoter methylation testing and possibly other molecular testing in clinically defined glioma subtypes. Various molecular testing platforms for evaluation of MGMT methylation status are also discussed.

Cited by (0)

Supported by the Association for Molecular Pathology.

The MGMT Working Group was an ad hoc working group of the AMP Clinical Practice Committee. The 2010–2012 AMP Clinical Practice Committee consisted of Milena Cankovic, M. Fernanda Sabato Charreun, Christine Curtis, Michelle Dolan, William Funkhouser, Jane Gibson, Jerald Gong, Cyrus Hedvat, Thomas Huard, Linda Jeng, Loren Joseph, Neal Lindeman, Janina Longtine (Chair, 2011–2012), Ira Lubin, Kathleen Montone, Federico Monzon, Narasimhan Nagan, Joseph Pulliam, Iris Schrijver (Chair, 2010), Siby Sebastian, Laura Tafe, Patrik Vitazka, Jeffrey Wisotzkey, and Donna Wolk.

Standard of practice is not defined by this article, and there may be alternatives. See Disclaimer for further details.