Elsevier

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Volume 47, January 2018, Pages 168-173
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Case study
Morphologic patterns of noncontrast-enhancing tumor in glioblastoma correlate with IDH1 mutation status and patient survival

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Glioblastomas can be classified by the pattern of nCET.

  • IDH1mut glioblastomas often demonstrate mass-like nCET.

  • Using the morphology of nCET can thus improve the prediction of IDH1 mutations.

  • The pattern of nCET may also influence patient survival.

Abstract

Glioblastomas with a substantial proportion of noncontrast-enhancing tumour (nCET) have a variety of imaging appearances. We aimed to determine whether glioblastomas demonstrating a substantial proportion (>33%) of nCET can be sub-classified by different morphologic pattern of nCET. We then assessed whether this improves the ability of MRI to predict isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutation status and whether this has prognostic significance independent of IDH1 mutation status. Pre-operative MRIs of patients with a new diagnosis of glioblastoma were reviewed. Tumours with >33% nCET were sub-classified by the dominant morphologic pattern of nCET: mass-like expansion, white matter dissemination, grey matter dissemination or a combination. IDH1 mutation status (by immunohistochemistry) and survival were compared for each pattern. 153 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 34 patients demonstrated >33% nCET. 10 patients had a significant mass-like component, either as the dominant pattern (n = 4) or as part of a mixed pattern (n = 6). The 10 patients with a significant mass-like component had longer survival than those without (median 387 days, compared to 241 days), though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.242). Three patients had R132H-IDH1 mutations and >33% nCET, and all three had a mass-like component. Using the presence of a mass-like component of nCET for predicting IDH1 mutation status improved the positive predictive value, specificity and overall accuracy of MRI. Classification of nCET by morphologic pattern improves the ability of MRI to predict IDH1 mutations and may provide useful prognostic information.

Introduction

Tumours with the same histological diagnosis of glioblastoma and an equivalent proportion of noncontrast-enhancing tumour (nCET) according to the current VASARI criteria [1] often, however, have vastly different imaging appearances. We sought to determine if variation in appearance has clinical or prognostic implications for the patient. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation testing has become a crucial part of glioma assessment and is recommended as routine in the recently-updated World Health Organisation guidelines due to its prognostic importance [2]. Carrillo et al. have previously described an association between isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutations in glioblastoma patients with the presence and a greater proportion of nCET [3]. In our own patient cohort we also found that the presence of >33% nCET improved the prediction of IDH1 mutation status, however this association was only modest [4]. Due to the low incidence of IDH1 mutations in glioblastoma, reported as being <5% [5], the majority of patients with >33% nCET nonetheless have IDH1-wildtype (IDH1wt) tumours [4].

Illustrative images were provided for four patients with IDH1-mutated (IDH1mut) glioblastomas in the study by Carrillo et al. [3], and closer inspection suggests that all patients had a dominant, partially-enhancing mass, rather than a more widely-disseminated pattern of nCET. In fact, the presence of nCET distant to the dominant glioblastoma has been shown to be a feature of IDH1wt tumours [6]. Similarly, Seiz et al. found significant differences in the incidence of IDH1 mutations in patients with gliomatosis cerebri depending on the MRI appearances. IDH1 mutations were demonstrated in 10 of 24 patients who met the criteria for gliomatosis cerebri but also had a dominant mass, while no mutations were detected in 11 patients with widespread tumour but no dominant mass [7]. All patients in the above study can be assumed to have had extensive nCET given the diagnosis of gliomatosis cerebri, suggesting that it is not just the extent of nCET that has a role in determining IDH1 mutation status, but also the morphologic pattern.

We hypothesise that the current definition of nCET is too broad, encompassing a variety of molecular phenotypes, and thus limiting the predictive value of MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether glioblastomas demonstrating a substantial proportion (>33%) of nCET can be sub-classified by different morphologic pattern of nCET, and whether this classification can both improve the ability of MRI to predict IDH1 mutation status and provide prognostic information independent of IDH1 status.

Section snippets

Patient selection

Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Patients with a new diagnosis of glioblastoma between September 2007 and March 2011 were identified through the Central Nervous System Tumour Database at our hospital, which routinely captures all new astrocytoma patients treated at our institution. All were adult patients. Patients with prior surgery were excluded. Only patients with an MRI consisting of at least FLAIR and T1-weighted post-contrast sequences available for

Results

Of 186 patients initially identified, 153 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were excluded due to inadequate preoperative imaging (n = 24, usually due to lack of the FLAIR sequence) or insufficient histological material for IDH1 testing (n = 9 patients). 34 patients demonstrated >33% nCET (22% of the overall cohort). These were categorised as having a dominant mass-like pattern of nCET in four patients, a white matter pattern of dissemination in 8 patients, and a grey matter

Discussion

We have shown that a classification of nCET by morphologic pattern is not only feasible, but also clinically relevant. Characterisation of nCET by morphology substantially improves the ability of MRI to predict IDH1 mutations. As the rate of IDH1 mutations in glioblastoma is low [5], performing IDH testing routinely for all glioblastoma patients provides prognostic benefit to only a small proportion of patients, yet adds substantial cost. Using MRI may thus allow testing to be targeted to

Conclusions

Glioblastomas with substantial nCET exhibit different, but recognisable, morphologic patterns, which correlate with IDH1 mutation status and may influence patient survival. There is also the potential for a correlation with other genetic mutations and molecular subtypes. The current definition of nCET should be reviewed and sub-classified, for example into a dominant mass, grey matter dissemination and white matter dissemination as illustrated above. Such assessment may also improve our

Grant support

This study was supported by a RANZCR research grant in 2014.

References (11)

  • A.M. VASARI Research Project. https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/VASARI+Research+Project. Updated...
  • D.N. Louis et al.

    The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary

    Acta Neuropathol

    (2016)
  • J.A. Carrillo et al.

    Relationship between tumor enhancement, edema, IDH1 mutational status, MGMT promoter methylation, and survival in glioblastoma

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2012)
  • A. Lasocki et al.

    Reliability of noncontrast-enhancing tumor as a biomarker of IDH1 mutation status in glioblastoma

    J Clin Neurosci

    (2017)
  • H. Ohgaki et al.

    The definition of primary and secondary glioblastoma

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2013)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text