Original Article
22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Are Motor Deficits More Than Expected for IQ Level?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.073Get rights and content

Objective

To examine motor function in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2) and a Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) comparable control group.

Study design

This study was part of a prospective study of neuropsychological function in children 9 to 15 years of age with 22q11.2 and community control subjects and included children from these two populations with comparable FSIQs.

Results

Verbal IQs on the WISC-R for 40 children with 22q11.2 (88.4) and 24 community control subjects (87.2) were not different (P = .563). However, the performance IQs were (22q11.2; 81.1 vs community controls; 89.3; P < .001). On the Visual Motor Inventory, there was no difference between the standard scores of the two groups (22q11.2; 93.0 vs community control subjects; 98.1; P = .336) but on the motor coordination part of the Visual Motor Inventory, the scores of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome group were lower (77.2 vs 89.3; P = .002). On the general neurologic examination (P = .906), the tone examination (P = .705), and the ball skills part of the Motor Battery, (P = .378), there were no differences. However, on the axial stability part of the Motor Battery, the children with 22q11.2 exhibited less good balance (P = .026).

Conclusions

School-aged children with 22q11.2 have specific motor deficits in axial stability and graphomotor skills.

Section snippets

Methods

Children with 22q11.2 and community controls were recruited through the Center for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Study of Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome at the State University of New York–Upstate Medical University as part of a study of psychopathology in 22q11.2. All children in the 22q11.2 group had a FISH-confirmed deletion in the q11.2 locus of chromosome 22. The community control group was recruited from local public schools. Children with an identifiable genetic disorder or an identifiable

Results

The 22q11.2 group (n = 40) were younger (10.87 years [SD ± 2.49 years] vs 10.45 years [SD ± 2.66 years]; 2-tailed P = .0225) and of higher socioeconomic status (52.83 ± SD 10.16 vs 40.82 ± SD 13.25; 2-tailed P < .0001). Of the children with 22q11.2, 42.5% had ADHD compared with 35.2% of the control subjects (P = .347). With a discrepancy method to identify LD comparing Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) and Wechsler Individual Achievement Tests achievement test scores yielded only 3

Discussion

Our results support some clinical impressions and previous reports and dispute others. This data supports the clinical impression that children with 22q11.2 have axial instability. Although about a third of the children with 22q11.2 have low or very low tone, it was not significantly more common than the findings in the IQ-control group. Despite the low tone and axial instability, two-thirds of the children with 22q11.2 had ball skills in the normal range.

Several studies of younger children

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Neurological features associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

    2022, The Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment
  • A cross-comparison of cognitive ability across 8 genomic disorders

    2021, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
    Citation Excerpt :

    Using our search criteria, we identified 156 eligible studies that reported cognitive ability scores. This included 1 paper on 3q29 deletion [39], 36 papers on 7q11.23 deletion [32,40–74], 2 papers on 15q11.2 deletion (AS) [75,76], 31 papers on 15q11.2 deletion (PWS) [56,77–106], 6 papers on 16p11.2 deletion (proximal) [107–112], 4 papers on 16p11.2 duplication (proximal) [107,109,110,112], 3 papers on 17p11.2 deletion [113–115], and 73 papers on 22q11.2 deletion syndrome [74,80,116–186]. Studies reporting cognitive scores for 1q21.1 deletion, 2p15p16.1 deletion, and 9q34 deletion were not identified.

  • Relationship between reaction time, fine motor control, and visual-spatial perception on vigilance and visual-motor tasks in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

    2012, Research in Developmental Disabilities
    Citation Excerpt :

    Lajiness-O’Neill et al. (2006) found that subjects were relatively more impaired on perceptual-motor tasks compared to fine motor and motor-free visual–spatial tasks, suggesting that the problem is at the level of visual-motor integration. Problems with dexterity have also been reported (Roizen et al., 2010; Sobin, Monk, Kiley-Brabeck, Khuri, & Karayiorgou, 2006; Van Aken et al., 2007, 2009). To date, intellectual ability is the only variable found to be associated with motor performance in 22q11DS.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by NIMH (MH64824 and MH65481 to W.K; 5RO1MH064824 to A.H and R.S.), HRSA-T77MC00004 (N.R.), and NHLBI (5RO1HL084410-01 to A.H and R.S.). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

View full text