Standards of practice
Position Statement on Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation: A Consensus Statement Developed by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and American Society of Spine Radiology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2007.01.014Get rights and content

Section snippets

Vertebral Augmentation versus Traditional Conservative Management

Although “conservative” implies “safe,” conservative therapy of vertebral compression fractures is neither benign nor risk-free and its complications are well documented (46, 47, 48). Conservative treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures usually consists of bed rest, bracing, and narcotic analgesia. In a recent prospective study of 498 hospitalized patients aged 70 years or older, low mobility (defined as bed rest or ability to transfer to chair) or intermediate mobility (defined as

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (68)

  • M.E. Majd et al.

    Preliminary outcomes and efficacy of the first 360 consecutive kyphoplasties for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

    Spine J

    (2005)
  • A. Cherasse et al.

    Tolerability of opioids in patients with acute pain due to nonmalignant musculoskeletal disease: a hospital-based observational study

    Joint Bone Spine

    (2004)
  • D.C. Turk et al.

    Physicians’ attitudes and practices regarding the long-term prescribing of opioids for non-cancer pain

    Pain

    (1994)
  • S.L. Silverman

    The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture

    Bone

    (1992)
  • C. Vasconcelos et al.

    Transient arterial hypotension induced by polymethylmethacrylate injection during percutaneous vertebroplasty

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2001)
  • H. Deramond et al.

    Temperature elevation caused by bone cement polymerization during vertebroplasty

    Bone

    (1999)
  • J.D. Barr et al.

    Standard for the performance of percutaneous vertebroplasty

  • P. Galibert et al.

    Note préliminaire sur le traitement des angiomes vertébraux par vertebroplastie percutanée

    Neurochirurgie

    (1987)
  • P. Kaemmerlen et al.

    Vertébroplastie percutanée dans le traitement des métastases: technique et résultats

    J Radiol

    (1989)
  • J.P. Nguyen et al.

    Vertebral hemangioma with neurologic signs: therapeutic results Survey of the French Society of Neurosurgery

    Neurochirurgie

    (1989)
  • H. Deramond et al.

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of aggressive spinal angiomas

    Rachis

    (1989)
  • C. Debussche-Depriester et al.

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral crush fracture syndrome

    Neuroradiology

    (1991)
  • A. Gangi et al.

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (1994)
  • A. Cotten et al.

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up

    Radiology

    (1996)
  • A. Weill et al.

    Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic cement

    Radiology

    (1996)
  • M.E. Jensen et al.

    Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (1997)
  • A. Cotten et al.

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art

    Radiographics

    (1998)
  • A. Gangi et al.

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, technique, and results

    Radiographics

    (2002)
  • J.D. Barr et al.

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization

    Spine

    (2000)
  • T.J. Kaufmann et al.

    Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2001)
  • A.J. Evans et al.

    Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty—retrospective report of 245 cases

    Radiology

    (2003)
  • F. Grados et al.

    Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty

    Rheumatology (Oxford)

    (2000)
  • B. Cortet et al.

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study

    J Rheumatol

    (1999)
  • P.F. Heini et al.

    Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results—a prospective study for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures

    Eur Spine J

    (2000)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Vertebroplasty, Kyphoplasty, Lordoplasty, Expandable Devices, and Current Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

      2016, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The consensus of most neurosurgeons is that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are statistically both effective and safe if applied when properly indicated (i.e., for pain control if medical treatment fails in osteoporotic or neoplastic vertebral fracture patients) and have been proven in both retrospective and prospective studies as well as in meta-analysis.8-10 The benefits of the procedure supersede its risks, and it has proven to be cost effective.11 Few studies deny the benefits of vertebroplasty.12,13

    • Vertebroplasty trials: The medium is the message

      2014, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
    • Percutaneous vertebroplasty: Multi-centric results from EVEREST experience in large cohort of patients

      2012, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is a minimally invasive procedure in which bone cement polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is injected, using a needle positioned under CT or fluoroscopic guidance, into a vertebral body to treat pain associated with a vertebral compression fracture. The cement functions as an internal cast in the vertebra to provide pain relief and structural stabilization [3,4]. Some observational studies suggested that there is pain reduction after this procedure is performed [5–7] but the efficacy of PV is still debated [8–10]; in fact not only is the short-term efficacy of vertebroplasty unproven, but some authors hypothesized that after PV an increased risk of subsequent vertebral fractures may occur [8].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text