Clinical study
Intraarterial Therapy for Acute Ischemic Strokes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2008.11.021Get rights and content

Purpose

To determine the safety and feasibility of intraarterial stroke therapy for acute ischemic strokes at a community-based medical center.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of data gathered from consecutive stroke patients treated between June 2004 and April 2007. The following therapies were used to treat acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset: intraarterial thrombolytic drugs, intraarterial vasodilators, mechanical clot retrieval, intravascular stents, and angioplasty. The outcomes measured included posttherapy National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS), neurologic function at 90 days graded according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality.

Results

Eighty-three patients with a median baseline NIHSS of 17 (range, 3–30) were treated with intraarterial therapy. The median posttherapy NIHSS was 5 (range, 0–33). Forty-two patients (76%) had an mRS score of 2 or less at 90 days. The recanalization rate was 76%. Five patients (6%) had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and the 90-day mortality was 22%.

Conclusions

The results of this review showed that an intraarterial therapeutic approach to acute ischemic stroke was feasible at a community-based heath center and demonstrated encouraging data for outcome and safety.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

An institutional review board approved and evaluated retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data from stroke patients treated between June 2004 and April 2007 at a single institution. The institutional review board initially approved all protocol and procedures in 2001, with revisions as new technology and terminology were available. Operative physicians received informed consent from all patients before treatment.

After initial presentation to the emergency department, all patients

Results

During this review, 98 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography within 5 hours of symptom onset. The median time that it took stroke patients to arrive at the emergency department after the onset of symptoms was 115 minutes. Of the patients who underwent diagnostic angiography, 87 underwent intraarterial therapy; complete data were collected in 83 patients. The mean patient age was 69 years (range, 32–86 years); 43 of the 83 patients (52%) were men. The

Discussion

This review indicates that a combination intraarterial therapeutic approach to acute ischemic stroke based on the time of symptom onset, past medical history, and angiographic findings led to favorable outcomes with respect to published trials. The primary outcome with an mRS score of less than or equal to 2 at 90 days showed the overall percentage of treated patients with a favorable outcome was 11%–12% higher in this review than in the PROACT II study (P = .15) and the NINDS recombinant tPA

Acknowledgments

All patient care was performed at Mercy Health Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The authors wish to thank Heloisa Pearson, RN, Kelli Dutton, BSN, RN, and Marvin Mullin, RT, for data collection, data input, and statistical analysis.

References (17)

  • J.D. Barr et al.

    Acute stroke intervention with intraarterial urokinase infusion

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (1994)
  • Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke

    N Engl J Med

    (1995)
  • Y.P. Gobin et al.

    MERCI 1: a phase 1 study of Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia

    Stroke

    (2004)
  • A. Furlan et al.

    The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial–-prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • Emergency interventional stroke therapy: a statement from the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology Stroke Task Force of the American Society of Neuroradiology and the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2001)
  • H. Adams et al.

    Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke

    Stroke

    (2007)
  • K.R. Evenson et al.

    Prehospital and in-hospital delays in acute stroke care

    Neuroepidemiology

    (2001)
  • M.J. Reeves et al.

    Acute stroke care in the US: results from 4 pilot prototypes of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry

    Stroke

    (2005)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • Society of Interventional Radiology Training Guidelines for Endovascular Stroke Treatment

    2019, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Interventional radiologists have been partners with neurointerventional radiologists, endovascular neurosurgeons, and interventional neurologists in acute intervention for stroke (AIS) since the inception of EVT. Vascular/IR physicians who were not trained in formal neurointerventional fellowships have historically provided and continue to provide EVT in substantial numbers with good outcomes, comparable to those achieved by neurointerventional physicians during similar years (29–35). A recent survey of the Joint Commission (JC) PSCs found that 60% of the responding PSCs performed EVT, and, of these, 41% relied on IR physicians to provide this care (26).

  • Interventional Radiologists and Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Strokes

    2017, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
  • Efficacy of peripheral interventional radiologists performing endovascular stroke therapy guided by CT perfusion triage of patients

    2013, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The reason for the decreased rate of asymptomatic ICH is not likely related to the technique of the thrombectomy procedures but rather to improved patient selection for intervention with the use of CT perfusion imaging and/or the shorter time from stroke onset to treatment with the thrombectomy device in the present study. Other peripheral interventional radiologists have also shown good safety and efficacy in the endovascular treatment of stroke (15). Interventional radiologists in the present study who used CT perfusion imaging for patient selection achieved efficacy with endovascular stroke therapy, demonstrating low mortality rate and good neurologic outcome (mRS score ≤ 2 at 90 d), equal or in many cases exceeding those published in large trials of procedures performed by fellowship-trained neurointerventionalists (1–3).

  • Multisociety consensus quality improvement guidelines for intraarterial catheter-directed treatment of acute ischemic stroke, from the American Society of Neuroradiology, Canadian Interventional Radiology Association, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, ..

    2013, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The evidence for efficacy of endovascular therapy is less robust, but data for endovascular stroke procedures using fibrinolytic drugs or mechanical devices show promise. Evidence evaluating endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke now includes randomized trials subjected to metaanalysis (1–4), as well as registry data and case series (5–14). Techniques for revascularization use pharmacologic lysis, mechanical clot extraction, and clot displacement.

View all citing articles on Scopus

None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

View full text