Standards of Practice
Quality Improvement Guidelines for Adult Diagnostic Cervicocerebral Angiography: Update Cooperative Study between the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR), and Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.07.002Get rights and content

Section snippets

Preamble

The membership of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Standards of Practice Committee represents experts in a broad spectrum of interventional procedures from both the private and academic sectors of medicine. Generally, Standards of Practice Committee members dedicate the vast majority of their professional time to performing interventional procedures; as such, they represent a valid broad expert constituency of the subject matter under consideration for standards production.

Methodology

SIR produces its Standards of Practice documents using the following process. Standards documents of relevance and timeliness are conceptualized by the Standards of Practice Committee members. A recognized expert is identified to serve as the principal author for the standard. Additional authors may be assigned dependent upon the magnitude of the project.

An in-depth literature search is performed by using electronic medical literature databases. Then, a critical review of peer-reviewed articles

Definition and Procedural Overview

Cervicocerebral catheter angiography is a process by which intracranial and extracranial head and neck vasculature, hemodynamics, and pathologic conditions are evaluated. It consists of placement of a catheter selectively into extracranial cervical vessels under fluoroscopic guidance, followed by serial/sequential image acquisition during intravascular injection of contrast material to delineate anatomy of interest and to identify pathologic conditions. The catheter is usually inserted via a

Indications

Imaging of cerebrovascular disease has evolved into a multimodal, multiparametric model in which noninvasive imaging techniques such as CT angiography and MR angiography are complemented by CCA depending on the indication and individual patient situation. Also, it should be noted that the utility of CCA may vary based on locally available tools, technique, and expertise in each institution. Indications for CCA may include the following (1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 28, 41, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72,

Contraindications

There are no absolute contraindications to adult diagnostic CCA. Relative contraindications include iodinated contrast media allergy, hypotension, severe hypertension, coagulopathy, renal insufficiency, and congestive heart failure. Patients should be screened for these predisposing and perpetuating risk factors and conditions, and every effort should be made to control or correct them periprocedurally (43, 161).

Success Rate

A successful examination is defined as sufficient selective technical evaluation and image interpretation to establish or exclude pathologic conditions of the extracranial and intracranial circulation. Successful CCA routinely is performed in one session. Rarely, more than one session may be necessary because of limitation of vascular access, contrast media dose limit, patient intolerance, inadequate anesthesia, or comorbid illness such as congestive heart failure, which prevents prolonged

Complications

The complications of CCA can be divided into neurologic complications specific to this procedure and complications associated with catheter angiography in general (Table 1) (42, 58, 59, 143, 149, 161, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207).

Overall Procedure Threshold

The overall procedure threshold for major complications resulting from adult diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography is 2%. This threshold refers to any complication that requires additional therapy, results in prolonged hospitalization, or causes permanent adverse sequelae as defined in Appendix B.

Consensus Methodology

Reported complication-specific rates in some cases reflect the aggregate of major and minor complications. Thresholds are derived from critical evaluation of the literature, evaluation of empirical data from Standards of Practice Committee members’ practices, and, when available, the SIR HI-IQ System national database.

Consensus on statements in this document was obtained by using a modified Delphi technique (208, 209).

Minor Complications

A. No therapy, no consequence; or

B. Nominal therapy, no consequence; includes overnight admission for observation only.

Major Complications

C. Require therapy, minor hospitalization (< 48 h);

D. Require major therapy, unplanned increase in level of care, prolonged hospitalization (> 48 h);

E. Have permanent adverse sequelae; or

F. Result in death.

SIR Disclaimer

The clinical practice guidelines of the Society of Interventional Radiology attempt to define practice principles that generally should assist in producing high quality medical care. These guidelines are voluntary and are not rules. A physician may deviate from these guidelines, as necessitated by the individual patient and available resources. These practice guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other methods of care that are reasonably

Acknowledgments

Joan C. Wojak, MD, authored the first draft of this document and served as topic leader during the subsequent revisions of the draft. T. Gregory Walker, MD, and James Silberzweig, MD, are cochairs of the SIR Standards of Practice Committee, and Sean R. Dariushnia, MD, is the chair of the SIR Revisions Subcommittee. Boris Nikolic, MD, MBA, is Councilor of the SIR Standards Division. All other authors are listed alphabetically. Other members of the Standards of Practice Committee and SIR who

References (209)

  • W. Guo et al.

    Meta-analysis of diagnostic significance of sixty-four-row multi-section computed tomography angiography and three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography in patients with cerebral artery aneurysm

    J Neurol Sci

    (2014)
  • W. Chang et al.

    Emerging techniques for evaluation of the hemodynamics of intracranial vascular pathology

    Neuroradiol J

    (2015)
  • J. Menke et al.

    Diagnosing cerebral aneurysms by computed tomographic angiography: meta-analysis

    Ann Neurol

    (2011)
  • CADTH Rapid Response Reports. Computed Tomography Angiography versus Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis and...
  • A.M. Sailer et al.

    Diagnosing intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Stroke

    (2014)
  • C.B. Josephson et al.

    Computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial vascular malformations in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2014)
  • L. Behrens et al.

    Effect of thrombus size on recanalization by bridging intravenous thrombolysis

    Eur J Neurol

    (2014)
  • A.M. Frölich et al.

    4D CT angiography more closely defines intracranial thrombus burden than single-phase CT angiography

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2013)
  • S. Seeta Ramaiah et al.

    The impact of arterial collateralization on outcome after intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2014)
  • F. Miteff et al.

    The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke

    Brain

    (2009)
  • A.L. de Oliveira Manoel et al.

    Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage from a neuroimaging perspective

    Crit Care

    (2014)
  • W. Brinjikji et al.

    Carotid revascularization treatment is shifting to low volume centers

    J Neurointerv Surg

    (2015)
  • O. Adeoye et al.

    Geographic access to acute stroke care in the United States

    Stroke

    (2014)
  • A. Kowoll et al.

    Direct aspiration first pass technique for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: initial experience at a European stroke center

    J Neurointerv Surg

    (2015)
  • A. Mishra et al.

    Emergent extracranial internal carotid artery stenting and mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke

    Interv Neuroradiol

    (2015)
  • C. Sandoval-Garcia et al.

    4D DSA a new technique for arteriovenous malformation evaluation: a feasibility study

    J Neurointerv Surg

    (2015)
  • C.N. Ionita et al.

    Effect of injection technique on temporal parametric imaging derived from digital subtraction angiography in patient specific phantoms

    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng

    (2014)
  • T. Struffert et al.

    Dynamic angiography and perfusion imaging using flat detector ct in the angiography suite: a pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusions

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2015)
  • S. Tanoue et al.

    Fusion imaging using subtracted and unsubtracted rotational angiography for pretherapeutic evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistulas

    Jpn J Radiol

    (2014)
  • V.M. Srinivasan et al.

    Cone-beam CT angiography (Dyna CT) for intraoperative localization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations

    J Neurointerv Surg

    (2014)
  • M.G. Safain et al.

    Superior performance of cone-beam CT angiography in characterization of intracranial atherosclerosis

    J Neurosurg

    (2014)
  • J.P. Rahal et al.

    Benefit of cone-beam computed tomography angiography in acute management of angiographically undetectable ruptured arteriovenous malformations

    J Neurosurg

    (2013)
  • C.D. Morgan et al.

    Physiologic imaging in acute stroke: Patient selection

    Interv Neuroradiol

    (2015)
  • M. Romijn et al.

    Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2008)
  • S. Luo et al.

    Low tube voltage and low contrast material volume cerebral CT angiography

    Eur Radiol

    (2014)
  • V. Tsapaki et al.

    Comparison of patient dose in two-dimensional carotid arteriography and three-dimensional rotational angiography

    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

    (2008)
  • T. Struffert et al.

    Effective dose to patient measurements in flat-detector and multislice computed tomography: a comparison of applications in neuroradiology

    Eur Radiol

    (2014)
  • R. Otazo et al.

    Combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging for highly accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI

    Magn Reson Med

    (2010)
  • J.V. Velikina et al.

    PC HYPR flow: a technique for rapid imaging of contrast dynamics

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (2010)
  • K. Wang et al.

    Interleaved variable density sampling with a constrained parallel imaging reconstruction for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography

    Magn Reson Med

    (2011)
  • R.M. Lebel et al.

    Highly accelerated dynamic contrast enhanced imaging

    Magn Reson Med

    (2014)
  • M. Lustig et al.

    SPIRiT: iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space

    Magn Reson Med

    (2010)
  • H. Raoult et al.

    Time-resolved spin-labeled MR angiography for the depiction of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a comparison of techniques

    Radiology

    (2014)
  • J.F. Cardella et al.

    Optimal resources for the examination and endovascular treatment of the peripheral and visceral vascular systems: AHA intercouncil report on peripheral and visceral angiographic and interventional laboratories

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • C.G. Ullrich et al.

    The arteriographic diagnosis of extracranial cerebrovascular disease

  • J. McIver et al.

    Neurological morbidity of arch and carotid arteriography in cerebrovascular disease: the influence of contrast media and radiologist

    Br J Radiol

    (1987)
  • ACR-ASNR-SIR-SNIS Practice Parameter for the Performance of Diagnostic Cervicocerebral Catheter Angiography in Adults...
  • S.H. Ahn et al.

    Basic neuroangiography: review of technique and perioperative patient care

    Semin Intervent Radiol

    (2013)
  • S.C. Oudshoorn et al.

    Aneurysm treatment < 24 versus 24-72 h after subarachnoid hemorrhage

    Neurocrit Care

    (2014)
  • Y.G. Jeong et al.

    Outpatient (Same-day care) Neuroangiography and Neurointervention

    Neurointervention

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    J.A.H. is a paid consultant for Medtronic (Minneapolis, Minnesota) and CareFusion (San Diego, California) and is an owner or shareholder of Intratech. None of the other authors have identified a conflict of interest.

    View full text