- •
Spinal stenosis is a broad term encompassing central, lateral, and foraminal narrowing and implies compromise of the neural structures passing through that space.
- •
Imaging of spinal stenosis is primarily with MR imaging; however, CT and CT myelography (CTM) are acceptable alternatives.
- •
There is often a mismatch between imaging and clinical findings; accurate and rigorous interpretation of the imaging is necessary for correct management decisions.
- •
Cross-sectional imaging is usually acquired in a
Neuroimaging of Spinal Canal Stenosis
Section snippets
Key points
Lumbar spinal stenosis
The North American Spine Society 2011 revised guidelines1 provide the following definition:
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis describes a condition in which there is diminished space available for the neural and vascular elements in the lumbar spine secondary to degenerative changes in the spinal canal. When symptomatic, this causes a variable clinical syndrome of gluteal and/or lower extremity pain and/or fatigue, which may occur with or without back pain. Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis
Natural history
There is a conspicuous absence of good-quality longitudinal studies documenting the natural history of patients with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis. The North American Spine Society issued a statement that in the absence of reliable evidence, it is likely that the natural history of patients with mild to moderate symptomatic degenerative stenosis is favorable in one-third to one-half of patients. In patients with mild to moderate symptomatic stenosis, rapid or catastrophic neurologic decline
Clinical presentation of lumbar spinal stenosis
The diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis may be considered in older patients presenting with a history of gluteal or lower extremity symptoms exacerbated by walking or standing which improves or resolves with sitting or bending forward. Patients whose pain is not made worse with walking have a low likelihood of stenosis.1
There may be relative relief of symptoms on walking up an incline due to flexion of the lower spine. Saddle anesthesia and bladder disturbance are present in approximately 10%
Dynamic imaging
Imaging of the spine is routinely performed with the patient supine and in as relaxed a state as possible. The symptoms of spinal stenosis are commonly exacerbated by standing, walking, and extension. Imaging in extension versus neutral versus flexion and in an upright position or with axial loading applied have all been investigated to assess the relative effects on the spinal canal. Multiple studies have demonstrated a reduction in both dural sac area and midsagittal diameter on extension.
Cervical stenosis
Cervical spondylosis is a common finding that increases with age. Degeneration of nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disk leads to narrowing of the disk space, bulging of the annulus fibrosis, buckling of the ligamentum flavum, disk-osteophyte bar formation, and hypertrophic osteoarthritic changes of the facet and uncovertebral joints. This cascade of degenerative processes may or may not result in cervical stenosis. As in the lumbar canal, cervical stenosis may refer to central, lateral,
Thoracic spinal stenosis
Degenerative thoracic stenosis occurs much less commonly than cervical or lumbar stenosis; this is likely due to the structural support of the rib cage and the relative reduced movement. When it does occur, it is most frequently seen in the lower thoracic levels (T8–T12), possibly because of greater movement. The clinical presentation is that of myelopathy and/or radiculopathy and relates specifically to the level of the pathology. Disk-osteophyte bars and facet joint and ligamentum flavum
Summary
MR imaging is first-line investigation of spinal stenosis. The site, extent, and number of stenotic lesions may be demonstrated with great resolution and clarity. Standard MR imaging sequences are unable, however, to visualize the dynamic changes that occur in the spine on loading and movement. Furthermore, they are largely unable to detect the subtle histopathologic changes that occur as a result of compression, repetitive strain, venous congestion, ischemia, and inflammatory processes.
References (66)
- et al.
Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study
Spine J
(2009) - et al.
Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
(2012) - et al.
Imaging lumbar spinal stenosis
Radiol Clin North Am
(2001) - et al.
Clinical significance of redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina in lumbar spinal stenosis
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
(2008) - NASS revised 2011 guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar...
- et al.
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1991) - et al.
Lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: an overview
Eur Spine J
(2003) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1954)Gd-DTPA enhanced MR of the lumbar spinal canal in patients with claudication
J Comput Assist Tomogr
(1993)- et al.
Imaging of cauda equina edema in lumbar canal stenosis by using gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: experimental constriction injury
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
(2006)
Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis
World J Orthop
Edema formation in spinal nerve roots induced by experimental, graded compression. An experimental study on the pig cauda equina with special reference to differences in effects between rapid and slow onset of compression
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Changes in epidural pressure during walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Ectopic firing due to artificial venous stasis in rat lumbar spinal canal stenosis model: a possible pathogenesis of neurogenic intermittent claudication
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Clinical analysis of two-level compression of the cauda equina and the nerve roots in lumbar spinal canal stenosis
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Measurement of the local pressure of the intervertebral foramen and the electrophysiological values of the epidural nerve roots in the vertebral foramen
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Lumbar herniated disk disease and canal stenosis: prospective evaluation by surface coil MR, CT, and myelography
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Comparison of MRI to contrast CT in the diagnosis of spinal stenosis
Spine
Symptoms of spinal stenosis do not improve after epidural steroid injection
Clin J Pain
Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
The importance of posterior epidural fat pad in lumbar central canal stenosis
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Electromyographic and magnetic resonance imaging to predict lumbar stenosis, low-back pain, and no back symptoms
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Computed tomography of the spine and spinal cord
Radiology
Quantitative assessment of the lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography
Radiology
The significance and principles of computerized axial tomography in idiopathic developmental stenosis of the bony lumbar vertebral canal
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Computed tomography after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients' pain patterns, walking capacity, and subjective disability had no correlation with computed tomography findings
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: clinical features related to radiographic findings
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Functional myelography with metrizamide in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis
Acta Radiol Suppl
Neurogenic intermittent claudication in cases with absolute and relative stenosis of the lumbar vertebral canal (ASLC and RSLC), in cases with narrow lumbar intervertebral foramina, and in cases with both entities
Clin Neurosurg
Cross-sectional area of the stenotic lumbar dural tube measured from the transverse views of magnetic resonance imaging
J Spinal Disord
Cited by (31)
Imaging of the Aging Spine
2022, Radiologic Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Central spinal canal stenosis may be congenital in nature owing to congenitally short pedicles or acquired owing to disc-osteophytic protrusion, thickened LF, and facet arthropathy, all of which develop or progress with aging (Fig. 9).6 The frequency of acquired absolute stenosis of less than 10 mm increases from 4% of patients younger than 40 years to 14.3% in those older than 60 years.33 The prevalence of spinal canal stenosis in patients without a history of back pain can be up to 21%.40
Lumbosacral Spine MRI
2021, Atlas of Spinal Imaging: Phenotypes, Measurements and Classification SystemsNatural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations
2020, World Neurosurgery: XCitation Excerpt :Literature is full of different recommendation studies. In 2016, Cowley9 published a review analyzing the circumstances underlying the physical narrowing of the spinal canal, the pathophysiology of clinical syndromes associated with stenosis, the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of different imaging strategies, the different observational sings and objective criteria that have been proposed in neuroimaging literature, and clinical-radiologic correlation. Andreisek et al10 presented the results of a consensus conference regarding core radiologic parameters to describe the lumbar stenosis.
Radiographic Cobb Angle: A Feature of Congenital Lumbar Spine Stenosis
2019, Current Problems in Diagnostic RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Interestingly, in our cohort, a higher BMI was more common in the CLSS cohort compared to the degenerative cohort, although this did not reach statistical significance overall. An interesting consideration for future study is that an already congenitally small lumbar canal diameter may become symptomatic with additional epidural fat deposition in patients with higher BMI.13 The retrospective study design is a limitation of this study as we cannot account for selection bias and unidentified confounders as can be done with a prospective randomized study design.
The author has nothing to disclose.