Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 23, Supplement 1, 2004, Pages S151-S160
NeuroImage

Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.068Get rights and content

Construction of population atlases is a key issue in medical image analysis, and particularly in brain mapping. Large sets of images are mapped into a common coordinate system to study intra-population variability and inter-population differences, to provide voxel-wise mapping of functional sites, and help tissue and object segmentation via registration of anatomical labels. Common techniques often include the choice of a template image, which inherently introduces a bias. This paper describes a new method for unbiased construction of atlases in the large deformation diffeomorphic setting.

A child neuroimaging autism study serves as a driving application. There is lack of normative data that explains average brain shape and variability at this early stage of development. We present work in progress toward constructing an unbiased MRI atlas of 2 years of children and the building of a probabilistic atlas of anatomical structures, here the caudate nucleus. Further, we demonstrate the segmentation of new subjects via atlas mapping. Validation of the methodology is performed by comparing the deformed probabilistic atlas with existing manual segmentations.

Introduction

Since Broadman 1909, the construction of brain atlases has been central to the understanding of the variabilities of brain anatomy. More recently, since the advent of modern computing and digital imaging techniques intense research has been directed toward the development of digital three-dimensional atlases of the brain. Most digital brain atlases so far are based on a single subject's anatomy (Ho et al., 2002, Warfield et al., 2002). Although these atlases provide a standard coordinate system, they are limited because a single anatomy cannot faithfully represent the complex structural variability between individuals. A major focus of computational anatomy has been the development of image mapping algorithms (Gee et al., 1993, Miller and Younes, 2001, Rohlfing et al., 2003b, Thompson and Toga, 2002) that can map and transform a single brain atlas on to a population. In this paradigm, the atlas serves as a deformable template (Grenander, 1994). The deformable template can project detailed atlas data such as structural, biochemical, functional as well as vascular information on to the individual or an entire population of brain images. The transformations encode the variability of the population under study. A statistical analysis of the transformations can also be used to characterize different populations (Csernansky et al., 1998, Hohne et al., 1992, Talairach et al., 1988). For a detailed review of deformable atlas mapping and the general framework for computational anatomy, see Grenander and Miller (1998) and Thompson and Toga (1997). One of the fundamental limitations of using a single anatomy as a template is the introduction of a bias based on the arbitrary choice of the template anatomy.

Thompson and Toga (1997) very elegantly address this bias in their work by mapping a new data set on to every scan in a brain image database. This approach addresses the bias by in effect forgoing the formal construction of a representative template image. Although this framework is mathematically elegant and powerful, it results in a computationally prohibitive approach in which each new scan has to be mapped independently to all the data sets in a database. This is analogous to comparing each subject under study to every previously analyzed image. As brain image databases grow the analysis problem grows combinatorially.

In more recent and related work, Avants and Gee (2004) developed an algorithm in the large deformation diffeomorphic setting for template estimation by averaging velocity fields.

Most other previous work (Bhatia et al., 2004) in atlas formation has focused on the small deformation setting in which arithmetic averaging of displacement fields is well defined. Guimond et al. (2000) develop an iterative averaging algorithm to reduce the bias. In the latest work of Bhatia et al. (2004), explicit constraints requiring that the sum of the displacement fields add to zero is enforced in the proposed atlas construction methodology. These small deformation approaches are based on the assumption that a transformations of the form h(x) = x + u(x), parameterized via a displacement field, u(x), are close enough to the identity transformation such that composition of two transformations can be approximated via the addition of their displacement fields:h1h2(x)x+u1(x)+u2(x).The focus of this paper is a development of a methodology that simultaneously estimates the transformations and an unbiased template, in the large deformation setting. The method developed herein does not assume the above approximation of Eq. (1) and build atlases of populations with large geometric variability.

Section snippets

Methods

Given a collection of anatomical images, a natural problem is the construction of a statistical representative of the population. If the data associated with the population under study can be easily parameterized by a flat Euclidean space, classical statistical methods of simple averaging can be applied to generate such a representative. The imaging data under the Gaussian assumption can be easily represented as member of a flat space. The image can be represented as a member of very large

Inverse consistent image registration

When the template construction framework presented in the previous section is applied to two images the result is an inherently inverse consistent image registration algorithm—no correction penalty for consistency is required.

A registration framework is inverse consistent if image ordering does not affect the registration result. Many image registration algorithms are not inverse consistent because their image dissimilarity metrics are computed in the coordinate system of one of the images

Implementation

In this paper, we present results based on a greedy fluid flow algorithm and are currently working on implementing the full space time optimization based on the Euler–Lagrange equations derived by Lorenzen and Joshi (2003). Following the greedy fluid algorithm of propagating templates described in Miller and Younes (2001), we approximate the solution to the minimization problem in Eq. (7) using an iterative greedy method. At each iteration k, the updated transformation hik + 1, for each image Ii

Driving application: autism neuroimaging study

In the following, we describe the application of the unbiased atlas construction to an ongoing infant autism study directed by Joseph Piven at UNC Chapel Hill. From the partnership with our Psychiatry department, we have access to a morphologic MRI study with a large set of autistic children (N = 50), developmentally delayed subjects (N = 25), and control subjects (N = 25), scanned at age two with follow-up at age four. This project employs structural (MRI) and functional (fMRI) neuroimaging

Conclusions

In this paper, a new concept for unbiased construction of atlases is presented based on Frechet means in metric spaces. This approach results in an iterative algorithm of simultaneous deformation of a population of subject images into a new average image that evolves iteratively. This technique avoids the systematic bias introduced by selecting a template but also the combinatorial problem of deformation of a large number of data sets into each new subject.

The new techniques produces a

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the NIH NIBIB grant P01 EB002779, the NIMH Silvio Conte Center for Neuroscience of Mental Disorders MH064065, DOD Prostate Cancer Research Program DAMD17-03-1-0134,and the UNC Neurodevelopmental Research Core NDRC, subcore Neuroimaging. The MRI images of infants, caudate images, and expert manual segmentations are funded by NIH RO1 MH61696 and NIMH MH 64580 (PI: Joseph Piven). Manual segmentations are by Michael Graves and Rachel Gimpel, with protocol development

References (34)

  • B. Avants et al.

    Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • K.K. Bhatia et al.

    Consistent groupwise non-rigid registration for atlas construction

    IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

    (2004)
  • F.L. Bookstein

    Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data

    (1991)
  • J.C. Csernansky et al.

    Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (1998)
  • P. Dupuis et al.

    Variational problems on flows of diffeomorphisms for image matching

    Q. Appl. Math.

    (1997)
  • P.Thomas Fletcher et al.

    Statistics of shape via principal geodesic analysis on lie groups

  • P.T. Fletcher et al.

    Gaussian distributions on lie groups and their application to statistical shape analysis

  • Maurice Frechet

    Les elements aleatoires de nature quelconque dans un espace distancie

    Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare

    (1948)
  • J.C. Gee et al.

    Elastically deforming an atlas to match anatomical brain images

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1993)
  • G. Gerig et al.

    VALMET: a new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation

  • U. Grenander

    General Pattern Theory

    (1994)
  • U. Grenander et al.

    Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline

    Q. Appl. Math.

    (1998)
  • A. Guimond et al.

    Average brain models: a convergence study

    Comput. Vis. Image Underst.

    (2000)
  • He, Jianchun, Christensen, Gary E., 2003. Large deformation inverse consistent elastic image registration. In: Taylor,...
  • S. Ho et al.

    Level set evolution with region competition: automatic 3-D segmentation of brain tumors

  • K.H. Hohne et al.

    A 3d anatomical atlas based on a volume model

    IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl.

    (1992)
  • S. Joshi et al.

    On the geometry and shape of brain sub-manifolds

    International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence: Special Issue on Processing of MR Images of the Human

    (1997)
  • Cited by (780)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text