Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 95, 15 July 2014, Pages 106-116
NeuroImage

Rapid, high-resolution quantitative magnetization transfer MRI of the human spinal cord

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Applied the single-point qMT method to cervical spinal cord in vivo.

  • Evaluated assumption validity in single-point model in disease and healthy tissue.

  • SC qMT can provide MPF maps in vivo with excellent grey/white matter contrast.

  • Observed MPF values were higher in healthy WM and GM than in MS lesions.

  • This technique may provide a reliable outcome for evaluating spinal cord disease.

Abstract

Quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) imaging can provide indices describing the interactions between free water protons and immobile macromolecular protons. These indices include the macromolecular proton fraction (MPF), which has been shown to correlate with myelin content in white matter. Because of the long scan times required for high-resolution spinal cord imaging, qMT studies of the human spinal cord have not found wide-spread application. Herein, we investigated whether these limitations could be overcome by utilizing only a single MT-weighted acquisition and a reference measurement, as was recently proposed in the brain. High-resolution, in vivo qMT data were obtained at 3.0 T in the spinal cords of healthy volunteers and patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Low- and high-resolution acquisitions (low/high resolution = 1 × 1 × 5 mm3/0.65 × 0.65 × 5 mm3) with clinically acceptable scan times (12 min/7 min) were evaluated. We also evaluated the reliability over time and the sensitivity of the model to the assumptions made in the single-point method, both in disease and healthy tissues. Our findings suggest that the single point qMT technique can provide maps of the MPF in the spinal cord in vivo with excellent grey/white matter contrast, can be reliably obtained within reasonable scan times, and are sensitive to MS pathology. Consistent with previous qMT studies in the brain, the observed MPF values were higher in healthy white matter (0.16 ± 0.01) than in grey matter (0.13 ± 0.01) and in MS lesions (0.09 ± 0.01). The single point qMT technique applied at high resolution provides an improved method for obtaining qMT in the human spinal cord and may offer a reliable outcome measure for evaluating spinal cord disease.

Introduction

The spinal cord is responsible for mediating neurological function between the brain and the peripheral nervous system and is somatotopically organized — sensory information is conveyed through the dorsal columns, while the lateral columns convey a significant fraction of motor function. The integrity of these organized columns is vital to preserving specific neurological function; therefore, even small spinal cord lesions (e.g. multiple sclerosis (MS)) can result in severe neurological impairment. While the absolute mechanism of the pathophysiology of MS and nervous system tissue deterioration remains challenging to unravel, there is a body of evidence that suggests that axonal loss resulting in spinal cord atrophy may relate to clinical impairment (Cohen et al., 2012, Rocca et al., 2011). Conventional MRI (i.e. spin-density, T1- and T2-weighted) can be used to measure atrophy or determine the location of inflammatory lesions in the spinal cord, but the relationship between conventional MRI indices (e.g. atrophy, lesion burden) and nervous system function and disease progression over time tends to be poor (Stankiewicz et al., 2009).

More quantitative MRI measurements, such as magnetization transfer (MT) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics have been applied to the cervical spinal cord to investigate the relationship between neurological function and spinal cord microstructure (Cohen-Adad et al., 2011, Ellingson et al., 2008, Filippi and Agosta, 2010, Freund et al., 2010, Nair et al., 2010, Naismith et al., 2013, Oh et al., 2013, Poloni et al., 2011, Smith et al., 2009, Zackowski et al., 2009). Importantly, as these measurements report on microstructural changes that may precede atrophy, they potentially offer greater prediction of spinal cord function than conventional methods. While quantitative MRI methods have shown promise for characterizing spinal cord damage in diseases such as MS (Stroman et al., 2014, Wheeler-Kingshott et al., 2014), widespread adoption has been challenged by the low signal to noise ratio (SNR), long acquisition times, and sensitivity to motion.

The focus of this work is on magnetization transfer (MT) imaging. Briefly, in addition to free water protons observed with conventional MRI, there are protons residing on immobile macromolecules in tissue (Wolff and Balaban, 1989). Conventional MRI cannot image these protons directly because their T2 relaxation times are too short (≈ 10 μs) to be captured by typical readout schemes. However, these macromolecular protons communicate with the surrounding water and, thus, can be indirectly imaged by exploiting this exchange, which is referred to as the MT effect. Importantly, MT imaging can serve as a surrogate marker for white matter myelin density in nervous system tissue (Koenig, 1991, Kucharczyk et al., 1994, Schmierer et al., 2007) and, therefore, may be a more specific biomarker of disease evolution. Despite this promise, MT imaging has faced significant challenges in the spinal cord.

The contrast in an MT experiment is generated via application of a radiofrequency (RF) irradiation pulse at an offset frequency with respect to water (Δω) to selectively saturate the spectrally broad macromolecular protons. This saturation is then transferred to the free water pool via MT, resulting in an observed signal attenuation. The MT effect is often semi-quantitatively characterized via the MTR, which has been shown to correlate with myelin content (Schmierer et al., 2007). Unfortunately MTR is also sensitive to pulse sequence design, B1 and B0 inhomogeneities (Berry et al., 1999), as well as tissue relaxation times and other non-MT-specific NMR parameters (Henkelman et al., 1993, Stanisz et al., 2005). This limits the ability of researchers and clinicians to create a standard MTR metric to define pathology. To overcome some of these limitations and to derive indices that are directly reflective of MT phenomena, quantitative MT (qMT) has been developed and implemented in the brain, but rarely in the spinal cord (Levesque et al., 2010b, Samson et al., 2013, Sled and Pike, 2001, Smith et al., 2009, Stanisz et al., 2005). qMT typically requires images to be acquired at multiple RF irradiation powers and/or offsets, generating a so-called MT z-spectrum for each voxel (Hinton and Bryant, 1996). The resulting z-spectrum can then be fit to a two (or more)-pool model to estimate quantitative indices, such as the macromolecular proton fraction (MPF) – defined as the macromolecular pool size divided by the sum of the macromolecular and free pool sizes, or f, as reported by Yarnykh (2012) – the MT exchange rate from the macromolecular pool to the free pool (kmf), and the transverse and longitudinal relaxation times for each pool (Stanisz et al., 2005). Often, the focus is on the MPF as it has been shown to correlate well with white matter myelin density (Odrobina et al., 2005, Ou et al., 2009, Schmierer et al., 2007, Underhill et al., 2011), and may offer a biomarker of demyelination and axonal loss in white matter pathologies.

While qMT offers indices reflective of tissue physiology, translation of this methodology into the spinal cord within a clinically feasible scan time has proven to be a challenge. Even in the brain, collection of multi-power, multi-offset, high SNR, voxel-wise MT z-spectra can result in scan times as long as 30–45 min for whole-brain coverage at low resolution (Yarnykh, 2012). As the cord is small (only 1.5 cm in diameter at the cervical levels), with its component white and grey matter groups on the order of millimeters, even higher resolution is necessary, exacerbating the scan time problem. Additionally, at these high-resolutions, transverse spinal cord motion resulting from cardiac and respiratory cycles, as well as cerebrospinal fluid pulsation, can lead to substantial artifacts. Lastly, the spinal cord is surrounded by large bones that create spatially varying susceptibility gradients. Importantly for qMT, these susceptibility gradients can alter the effective B1 and B0 fields, leading to spatially dependent RF powers and offset frequencies. Fortunately, when performing qMT in the spinal cord, the model incorporates both B1 and B0 corrections, which can minimize the impact of spatially varying B1 and B0 errors in the estimated MPF value.

A new method to perform a qMT analysis using only a single MT-weighted acquisition and a reference measurement (no RF saturation) has been recently proposed for the brain (Yarnykh, 2012). This method imposes constraints on the two-pool model in order to derive quantitative maps of the MPF in tissue from a single offset measurement (n.b., additional T1, B1, and B0 measurements are also performed). Using this model, improved resolution or reduced sensitivity to motion can potentially be realized in clinically relevant scan times, making it a viable approach for the spinal cord. Thus, the goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of translating this single-point approach to the cervical spinal cord as a means of performing high resolution, rapid qMT imaging. Towards this end, we performed in vivo qMT in the cervical spinal cord of healthy controls and MS patients using (i) a low-resolution, multi-offset and power MT acquisition with a full model fit (the gold-standard); and (ii) high-resolution, single-point fits using the optimal offset and power from numerical simulations (c.f. Materials and methods section). We evaluated the robustness of the single-point methods and sensitivity for disease in patients with MS. Additional numerical studies were performed to assess the affect of the constraints on the single-point qMT parameters. Lastly, the reproducibility of the acquisition and analysis methods was experimentally studied.

Section snippets

Data acquisition

The local Institutional Review Board approved this study, and signed informed consent was obtained prior to the examination. Data were obtained from ten healthy volunteers (5 male, age range 23–28 years, mean age 25.6 ± 1.7 years) and two female relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) patients (31 and 25 years) on a 3.0 T Philips Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). A quadrature body coil was used for excitation and a 16-channel neurovascular coil was used for signal reception. A second

Data acquisition

Representative MT-weighted images in a healthy volunteer at the level of C3/4 are shown in Fig. 1a, and corresponding high-resolution mFFE data are given in Fig. 1b. Note that the cropped images shown in Figs. 1a and d–g are derived from the registration process (c.f. Materials and methods section). Fig. 1c shows mean ROI data (circles) placed in the lateral column white matter of a healthy volunteer at powers = 360° (black) and 820° (blue). The solid lines denote the full-fit qMT analysis, which

Discussion

The goal of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of high-resolution MPF mapping of the human spinal cord in vivo. We compared the MPF across volunteers, between left and right lateral columns, between lateral and dorsal columns, between white matter and grey matter, and evaluated the slice-wise variability as well as the test–retest reliability for white matter and grey matter in the cervical spinal cord. We show that the MPF can be consistently obtained in healthy volunteers, and that

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of performing qMT imaging in human spinal cord in vivo. The development of this technique allows for a higher resolution quantitative scan of the spinal cord in less time than is needed for a conventional full-fit qMT acquisition. In healthy subjects, intra-subject reliability (i.e. test-retest) and through cord similarities were demonstrated for both full-fit and single-point acquisitions. This method was also performed on patients with

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ms. Donna Butler, Ms. Leslie McIntosh, Ms. Kristen George-Durrett, Ms. Clair Kurtenbach, and Mr. David Pennell, who provided invaluable assistance with the data collection. This work was supported by NIH/NIBIB K01 EB009120 (SAS), NIH/NIBIB K25 EB013659 (RDD), and NIH/NCI R25 CA136440 (AKS).

References (47)

  • H.R. Underhill et al.

    Fast bound pool fraction imaging of the in vivo rat brain: association with myelin content and validation in the C6 glioma model

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • C.A. Wheeler-Kingshott et al.

    The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: applications

    Neuroimage

    (2014)
  • V.L. Yarnykh et al.

    Cross-relaxation imaging reveals detailed anatomy of white matter fiber tracts in the human brain

    Neuroimage

    (2004)
  • I. Berry et al.

    A multicenter measurement of magnetization transfer ratio in normal white matter

    J. Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1999)
  • J.M. Bland et al.

    Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • A.B. Cohen et al.

    The relationships among MRI-defined spinal cord involvement, brain involvement, and disability in multiple sclerosis

    J. Neuroimaging

    (2012)
  • R.D. Dortch et al.

    Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging of human cervical spinal cord at 3 T

  • B.M. Ellingson et al.

    Diffusion tensor MR imaging in chronic spinal cord injury

    AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.

    (2008)
  • M. Filippi et al.

    Imaging biomarkers in multiple sclerosis

    J. Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (2010)
  • P. Freund et al.

    Recovery after spinal cord relapse in multiple sclerosis is predicted by radial diffusivity

    Mult. Scler.

    (2010)
  • P. Held et al.

    MRI of the abnormal cervical spinal cord using 2D spoiled gradient echo multiecho sequence (MEDIC) with magnetization transfer saturation pulse. A T2* weighted feasibility study

    J. Neuroradiol.

    (2003)
  • R.M. Henkelman et al.

    Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1993)
  • D.P. Hinton et al.

    1H magnetic cross-relaxation between multiple solvent components and rotationally immobilized protein

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (43)

    • High-b diffusivity of MS lesions in cervical spinal cord using ultrahigh-b DWI (UHb-DWI)

      2021, NeuroImage: Clinical
      Citation Excerpt :

      Advanced MRI techniques are currently used in exploratory studies to investigate microstructural abnormalities in the cervical spinal cord (CSC) which reflect neurodegeneration, and to develop new targets for therapeutic (Carlier and Bertoldi, 2005; Moccia et al., 2017; Moccia and Ciccarelli, 2017). These techniques include methods that study neuroaxonal integrity using DTI, myelin content using myelin water fraction (Soellinger et al., 2011) and magnetization transfer ratio (Filippi and Agosta, 2007; Pike et al., 2000; Schmierer et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2014). Among these techniques, DTI is considered the most mature and promising for quantitative evaluation of white-matter (Martin et al., 2016) in spinal cord.

    • Diffusion MRI microstructural models in the cervical spinal cord – Application, normative values, and correlations with histological analysis

      2019, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Adding more contrasts, possibly in combination with diffusion data, may provide more sensitive and specific measures of SC microstructure. For example, magnetization transfer or quantitative magnetization transfer (Smith et al., 2014; Dula et al., 2010; Reichet al., 2007), g-ratio mapping (Duvalet al., 2017; Duval et al., 2018), or T1w/T2w imaging (Ganzetti et al., 2014) may better quantify the myelin volume fraction (which diffusion is blind to) thereby improving estimates of the additional compartment sizes. Additionally, standard relaxometry (Harkins et al., 2012, 2013) can be combined with diffusion to gain insights into local tissue volumes or physiological environments.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Grant support: NIH/NIBIB K01 EB009120 (SAS), NIH/NIBIB K25 EB013659 (RDD), NIH/NCI R25 CA136440 (AKS).

    View full text