Elsevier

Pediatric Neurology

Volume 40, Issue 6, June 2009, Pages 413-419
Pediatric Neurology

Review Article
Prediction of Neurodevelopmental Outcome After Preterm Birth

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.01.008Get rights and content

Prediction of outcome after preterm birth is critical, but remains difficult, particularly in the early postnatal period. The ability to predict outcome improves parental counseling and selection of infants for early therapeutic strategies aiming at preventing or ameliorating cerebral injury. This review gives an overview of the spectrum and severity of neurodevelopmental, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes, with discussion of predictors of outcome and, in particular, the clinical, electrophysiological, and imaging predictors. A detailed neurologic examination of infants is a valuable predictive tool in terms of later moderate to severe neurodevelopmental impairments; however, it may be limited in the immediate newborn period. Electrophysiological, neuroimaging, and clinical risk factors for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome have been identified. Good prediction is usually achieved for major functional disabilities in early childhood, but is poorer for moderate or mild long-term outcome. Future research should focus on the long-term quality of life, academic achievement, and the influence of the sociocultural environment. More emphasis should be placed on genetic diversity as a modifying factor for the large variability in outcome.

Introduction

Neurodevelopmental outcome after preterm birth varies widely and relates to time of onset, severity, and duration of injury, which result in different injury patterns [1]. Prediction of outcome remains difficult, particularly in the early postnatal period. The ability to better predict outcome in the infant period could substantially improve parental counseling and would also have the benefit of providing a better selection of infants for early therapeutic strategies. In addition, the efficacy of medical interventions and their potential negative effects on the central nervous system need to be identified. The spectrum and severity of deficits are underestimated when outcome is limited to early childhood examination.

Infants at highest risk for neurodevelopmental impairments are those born before 32 weeks of gestation. Infants who are born with a gestational age between 32 and 37 weeks have only a mildly increased risk for neurodevelopmental problems, unless there is cerebral injury, but they probably constitute a somewhat overlooked population.

Section snippets

Focus: Very Preterm Infants

Prematurity is usually defined by birth weight rather than by gestational age, due to uncertainty of obstetric estimation of gestational age and the lack of precision in postnatal gestational age assessment, particularly in very small infants [2]. Using birth weight as the defining factor for prematurity is problematic, however, because gestational age is the stronger determinant of biologic maturation and viability. Thus, outcome of premature infants born small for gestational age may be

Outcome

In principle, outcome can be categorized into severe and moderate-to-mild deficits. Severe deficits are summarized as functional disability, usually defined as an aggregate group comprising cerebral palsy, mental retardation (developmental or intellectual quotient of less than 70), and severe visual or hearing impairment [12]. Severe deficits can be detected by the age of 2 years. Moderate to mild deficits, however, are often not detected until school-age.

Prevalence rates differ considerably

Goal

Prediction of outcome is important, because knowledge of the spectrum and severity of neurodevelopmental sequelae is vital for decisions on withdrawal of support for neonates at the border of viability.

Prediction has been the focus of research for many decades. Biochemical markers such as pH, Apgar score, and base excess have been shown to be of little or no use for outcome prediction in term infants [48]. In preterm infants, these parameters play a secondary role. Thus, the focus has shifted

Perinatal Variables

A variety of prenatal and neonatal risk factors have been associated with adverse outcome for the preterm population. Gestational age or maturity at birth, along with birth weight, constitutes the strongest predictor of adverse neuromotor [22], [75], [76] and intellectual outcome [25], [77]. Other perinatal factors have also been related to adverse outcome, however, with a weaker association than maturity. Among those are preeclampsia [78], chorioamnionitis [22], [79], [80], sepsis [22], [70],

Conclusion and Future Directions

Children born prematurely are at risk for major and minor neurodevelopmental disabilities affecting long-term academic, behavioral, and social functioning. Prediction of outcome is of significance in the neonatal period, when new therapeutic interventions are introduced and decisions about withdrawal of support are made. Knowledge of the severity and spectrum of impairments is necessary for counseling parents, tailoring follow-up services, and allocating early intervention programs.

A detailed

References (97)

  • K.J. Rademaker et al.

    Larger corpus callosum size with better motor performance in prematurely born children

    Semin Perinatol

    (2004)
  • T.E. Inder et al.

    Defining the nature of the cerebral abnormalities in the premature infant: a qualitative magnetic resonance imaging study

    J Pediatr

    (2003)
  • S.P. Miller et al.

    Early brain injury in premature newborns detected with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with adverse early neurodevelopmental outcome

    J Pediatr

    (2005)
  • J.K. Grether et al.

    Prenatal and perinatal factors and cerebral palsy in very low birth weight infants

    J Pediatr

    (1996)
  • S.P. Miller et al.

    Clinical signs predict 30-month neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal encephalopathy

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2004)
  • E.T. Hille et al.

    School performance at nine years of age in very premature and very low birth weight infants: perinatal risk factors and predictors at five years of age. Collaborative Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age (POPS) Infants in The Netherlands

    J Pediatr

    (1994)
  • I. Blickstein

    Normal and abnormal growth of multiples

    Semin Neonatol

    (2002)
  • S.H. Landry et al.

    Environmental effects on language development in normal and high-risk child populations

    Semin Pediatr Neurol

    (2002)
  • D.M. Ferriero

    Neonatal brain injury

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • T. Gutbrod et al.

    Effects of gestation and birth weight on the growth and development of very low birthweight small for gestational age infants: a matched group comparison

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2000)
  • P.H. Casey et al.

    Impact of prenatal and/or postnatal growth problems in low birth weight preterm infants on school-age outcomes: an 8-year longitudinal evaluation

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • E.C. Eichenwald et al.

    Management and outcomes of very low birth weight

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • J.A. Lemons et al.

    NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996

    Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • D.K. Richardson et al.

    Declining severity adjusted mortality: evidence of improving neonatal intensive care

    Pediatrics

    (1998)
  • D. Wilson-Costello et al.

    Improved neurodevelopmental outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants in 2000-2002

    Pediatrics

    (2007)
  • N. Marlow et al.

    EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • N. Marlow

    Neurocognitive outcome after very preterm birth

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2004)
  • G.P. Aylward

    Neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born prematurely

    J Dev Behav Pediatr

    (2005)
  • J.L. Watts et al.

    Outcome of extreme prematurity: as information increases so do the dilemmas

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2006)
  • G. Surman et al.

    Oxford Register of Early Childhood Impairments Management Group. Cerebral palsy rates among low-birthweight infants fell in the 1990s

    Dev Med Child Neurol

    (2003)
  • M. Hack et al.

    Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged children born with extremely low-birth-weight in the 1990s

    JAMA

    (2005)
  • C.M. Robertson et al.

    Changes in the prevalence of cerebral palsy for children born very prematurely within a population-based program over 30 years

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • N.S. Wood et al.

    EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • A.F. Colver et al.

    Increasing rates of cerebral palsy across the severity spectrum in north-east England 1964-1993. The North of England Collaborative Cerebral Palsy Survey

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2000)
  • P.O. Pharoah et al.

    The changing epidemiology of cerebral palsy

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (1996)
  • D. Wilson-Costello et al.

    Perinatal correlates of cerebral palsy and other neurologic impairment among very low birth weight children

    Pediatrics

    (1998)
  • S. Winter et al.

    Trends in the prevalence of cerebral palsy in a population-based study

    Pediatrics

    (2002)
  • G.P. Aylward

    Cognitive and neuropsychological outcomes: more than IQ scores

    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev

    (2002)
  • A.T. Bhutta et al.

    Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • J. Seitz et al.

    Correlations between motor performance and cognitive functions in children born < 1250 g at school age

    Neuropediatrics

    (2006)
  • D. Wolke

    Psychological development of prematurely born children

    Arch Dis Child

    (1998)
  • B.M. van den Hout et al.

    Relation between visual perceptual impairment and neonatal ultrasound diagnosis of haemorrhagic-ischaemic brain lesions in 5-year-old children

    Dev Med Child Neurol

    (2000)
  • P.J. Anderson et al.

    Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Executive functioning in school-aged children who were born very preterm or with extremely low birth weight in the 1990s

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • R.W. Cooke

    Health, lifestyle, and quality of life for young adults born very preterm

    Arch Dis Child

    (2004)
  • A. Johnson et al.

    Health and school performance of teenagers born before 29 weeks gestation

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2003)
  • F. Lefebvre et al.

    Cognitive and educational outcomes in early adulthood for infants weighing 1000 grams or less at birth

    Acta Paediatr

    (2005)
  • M. Hack et al.

    Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-weight infants

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • E.T. Hille et al.

    Dutch Collaborative POPS 19 Study Group. Functional outcomes and participation in young adulthood for very preterm and very low birth weight infants: the Dutch Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants at 19 years of age

    Pediatrics

    (2007)
  • Cited by (71)

    • Predictors of persistent and changing developmental problems of preterm children

      2021, Early Human Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      We included a total of 48 maternal, neonatal and social factors in our analyses, as shown in Table 1. We selected these factors because they were common in the preterm population during pregnancy and the neonatal period, or reported to be associated with developmental problems at follow-up in previous studies [7–12,17,18]. We collected the data of pre-existing maternal conditions, pregnancy-related factors, and neonatal factors from the hospital records of both mothers and children, and crosschecked these data with PCHC charts, and a parental general questionnaire filled out at the age of 4 years.

    • Multimodal assessment shows misalignment of structural and functional thalamocortical connectivity in children and adolescents born very preterm

      2020, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Together with the findings of the current study, this may suggest a specific misalignment between structure and function in conditions of impaired thalamocortical connectivity such as preterm birth, ASD or schizophrenia. Neurodevelopmental deficits including lower general cognitive abilities, executive dysfunctioning and poor academic abilities are frequent in very preterm children and adolescents even in the absence of major neurodevelopmental impairments (Aarnoudse et al., 2009; Brydges et al., 2018; Latal, 2009; Twilhaar et al., 2018). Importantly, intact thalamocortical connectivity has previously been shown to be essential for efficient cognitive functioning: For example, functional connectivity, particularly within the thalamus-salience network, predicted cognitive abilities at one year of age in healthy infants who underwent fMRI as neonates (Alcauter et al., 2014).

    • Specific cognitive deficits in preschool age correlated with qualitative and quantitative MRI parameters in prematurely born children

      2020, Pediatrics and Neonatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cognition is a complex range of processes, broader than the general ability usually measured by developmental or intelligence quotients. This quotient is not a criterion in assessing the cognitive consequences of perinatal lesion in preterm infants, especially due to the fact that there is a substantial number of children with mild cognitive impairment.12,13 In addition to evidence of global intellectual delay in children with more severe lesions, children with perinatal injury may have specific deficits in numerous areas: visuo-motor integration, visuo-spatial processing, verbal and language functions, learning, memory, executive functions and attention.13–16

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text