Original ArticleEndovascular Treatment of Children With Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Case Series
Introduction
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a serious condition affecting between 0.56 and 0.67 per 100,000 children per year.1, 2 In case series, between 2% and 10% of neonates and between 11% and 17% of older children die as a result of CVST and between 22% and 50% suffer neurological deficits.1, 2, 3, 4 Many minimally symptomatic patients may improve spontaneously and therefore go unrecognized, so this may be an overestimation. However, a proportion of patients will follow a severe course. The standard treatment is systemic anticoagulation with heparin and, in large pediatric case series, anticoagulation is associated with improved clinical outcome.1, 2 There is no randomized data to support this practice and little evidence on therapeutic options in the event of failure to respond to anticoagulation. In adults, this situation is considered a possible indication for endovascular treatment with local intrasinus thrombolysis or mechanical thromboaspiration, and favorable clinical outcomes are seen in as many as 92% of adult patients.5 The endovascular approach allows local thrombolytic directly targeted into the thrombus and for mechanical disruption or aspiration of thrombus, both of which contribute to recanalization, primarily through increasing the contact area between the thrombus and lytic agent. Mechanical thromboaspiration is relatively new and achieves more effective, faster restoration of venous flow with reduction in lytic requirement.
The role of endovascular therapy in the management of pediatric CVST is unclear, especially with regard to patient selection, optimal time to intervene, and contraindications to this therapy. We treated nine children using endovascular techniques with severe CVST who had failed to respond to anticoagulation or in whom anticoagulation was contraindicated. We aimed to assess outcomes after endovascular therapy in patients who had failed to show clinical improvement with conventional management.
Section snippets
Methods
Analysis of this cohort was approved by the Institutional Clinical Effectiveness and Audit Department. Nine consecutive children including seven girls and two boys (ages 18 months to 16 years) with severe CVST, treated using endovascular techniques at our institution between 1999 and 2013, were reviewed. Clinical presentation, decision to escalate therapy, methods of recanalization, and clinical outcome were assessed. All patients except one in whom anticoagulation was contraindicated were
Results
A summary of each patient is described in Table 1 and example cases are displayed in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3. Seven of the nine patients were comatose at the time of endovascular treatment. Five had suffered hemiparesis and three had suffered seizures. The distribution of occlusive thrombus is shown in Table 2. The majority had superior sagittal sinus (six of nine) and transverse sinus involvement but six of nine had straight sinus and five of nine had vein of Galen and internal cerebral
Discussion
Conventional treatment of CVST with anticoagulation aims to arrest thrombus propagation, but a proportion of patients continue to demonstrate clinical deterioration and thrombus propagation despite adequate anticoagulation. In these, lysis and/or disruption of existing thrombus may attain sinus recanalization and a reduction in venous pressure. A systematic review6 including 169 adult patients with CTV treated with local thrombolysis showed a possible benefit for those with severe CVST.
References (17)
- et al.
Neonatal sinovenous thrombosis: presentation and association with imaging
Pediatr Neurol
(2008) - et al.
Cerebral venous thrombosis as a cause of neonatal seizure
Pediatr Neurol
(1987) - et al.
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in children: risk factors, presentation, diagnosis and outcome
Brain
(2005) - et al.
Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis in Swiss children
Dev Med Child Neurol
(2010) - et al.
Cerebral venous thrombosis in children
J Child Neurol
(2001) - et al.
Local thrombolysis for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
(2012) - et al.
Thrombolytics for cerebral sinus thrombosis: a systematic review
Cerebrovasc Dis
(2003) - et al.
Local fibrinolysis in cerebral venous thrombosis
Pediatr Neurol
(1994)
Cited by (36)
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Treated with Vacuum Aspiration Thrombectomy without Thrombolysis: A Descriptive and Retrospective Study of 5 Years’ Experience at a Single Center
2022, Journal of Vascular and Interventional RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Vacuum aspiration thrombectomy without thrombolysis as a treatment for CVST has been reported previously in small case series (Table E1 [available online on the article’s Supplemental Material page at www.jvir.org]). Although the variations in the additional devices used and the small sample sizes of the studies impede comparisons between the previous studies and the current study, overall, at least partial recanalization was achieved in almost all patients, new or increased ICH was rarely reported, other complications were few, and many patients achieved a good outcome (2,11,19–22). In this study, partial recanalization was considered satisfactory because it allowed the anticoagulant to reach the remaining thrombi.
Headache and changes in artwork as a presentation of central venous sinus thrombosis in a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
2022, American Journal of Emergency MedicineEndovascular Intervention for Refractory Pediatric Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
2021, Pediatric NeurologyCerebrovascular Complications of Pediatric Blunt Trauma
2020, Pediatric NeurologyMechanical Thrombectomy in Pediatric Stroke: Report of Three New Cases
2020, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular DiseasesCitation Excerpt :Still, published cases of mechanical thrombectomy are pediatric CVT are scarce. A search of published case reports found only 11 reported cases of pediatric CVT treated with mechanical thrombectomy using modern stent retriever devices from 2010-2019.17,18,21,23-26 The age range was 9 days old to 16 years old, with 7 girls and 3 boys, 1 study did not report gender.
Mechanical Thrombectomy with Intraoperative Local Thrombolysis Versus Mechanical Thrombectomy with Continuous Thrombolysis for Treatment of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Systematic Review of 82 Cases
2019, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :Most patients with CVST will improve after receiving heparin or another anticoagulant. However, some patients will not respond well to systemic anticoagulation or will present with an acute disease state with rapid clinical deterioration.5 In recent years, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been increasing in popularity for the treatment of severe CVST when systemic anticoagulation is not appropriate.6-10