Clinical PaperValidation of the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category illness severity score☆
Introduction
Over 500,000 Americans suffer a cardiac arrest annually.1 Among those with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) admitted to the hospital, 50–70% die before discharge. Accurate prognostication of survival, good functional outcome and complications after ROSC can inform medical management, surrogate decision-making and resource allocation. Furthermore, a measure that controls for illness severity using early clinical characteristics would allow prospective stratification or retrospective adjustment in research that examines post-resuscitation care in this heterogeneous population. A number of illness severity scores have been developed for use after cardiac arrest, but rely on information that is not readily available to clinicians in the early hours after ROSC.2, 3, 4 Further, these scores are intended for use in either in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but not both.2, 3, 4 We previously derived an illness severity scale, the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category (PCAC), that was strongly associated with survival to hospital discharge and good functional outcome in both IHCA and OHCA.5 This scale was derived for simplicity, focus on objective physical findings, and relevance to post-arrest patients.
The present study was intended to validate the PCAC. We hypothesized that the PCAC would independently predict survival and functional outcome in two populations of patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest even after adjustment for other variables. Since neurological prognostication may lead to a “self-fulfilling prophecy” whereby care is withdrawn based on perceived prognosis,6 we assigned the PCAC prospectively at the center where it had been derived and retrospectively at another center. Thus, our study was intended to prospectively validate the PCAC in a population similar to the derivation cohort while simultaneously providing external validation to avoid the possibility of bias.
Section snippets
Methods
The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board approved this study.
Results
A total of 607 subjects with cardiac arrest were admitted during the study period (393 at Site 1 and 214 at Site 2). Subjects at Site 2 tended to be older, with a higher prevalence of PEA, IHCA, and received therapeutic hypothermia less frequently (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were similar across PCAC levels (Table 1). The frequency of IHCA and VF/VT decreased across PCAC levels while use of hypothermia increased. Inter-rater reliability of retrospective PCAC assignment yielded a kappa
Discussion
We demonstrate that PCAC is strongly associated with survival to hospital discharge and good functional outcome. This association is similar regardless of whether PCAC was assigned prospectively or retrospectively. Importantly, we have confirmed reproducibility of this association in two different hospital settings with demographically distinct patient populations and care practices. Finally, we have demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability when PCAC is retrospectively assigned. Although
Conclusion
PCAC, an illness severity score derived in a previous cohort of IHCA and OHCA patients, predicted survival and functional recovery in two different cohorts. This score can be calculated in all cardiac arrest survivors early after ROSC using information readily available to clinicians. PCAC is a useful method for making early estimates of prognosis and can be used to adjust for injury severity in future studies of post-resuscitation care.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Funding source
None.
References (33)
- et al.
An early, novel illness severity score to predict outcome after cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2011) - et al.
Outcomes of a hospital-wide plan to improve care of comatose survivors of cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2008) - et al.
The effect of hypothermia dose on vasopressor requirements and outcome after cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2013) - et al.
Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage
Lancet
(1975) - et al.
Association between Cerebral Performance Category, Modified Rankin Scale, and discharge disposition after cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2011) - et al.
Who survives cardiac arrest in the intensive care units?
J Crit Care
(2009) - et al.
Inter-rater reliability for witnessed collapse and presence of bystander CPR
Resuscitation
(2006) - et al.
Survival and outcome prediction using the Apache III and the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) score in patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) following out-of-hospital, in-hospital or ICU cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2012) - et al.
APACHE II scoring to predict outcome in post-cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2013) - et al.
Association between clinical examination and outcome after cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2010)
Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies
Emerg Med Clin N Am
Predictors of long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the impact of Activities of Daily Living and Cerebral Performance Category scores
Resuscitation
Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association
Circulation
Predicting survival with good neurological recovery at hospital admission after successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the OHCA score
Eur Heart J
A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest
Arch Intern Med
Get with the guidelines-resuscitation I. Development and validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
JAMA Intern Med
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.020.
- 1
The list of Post Cardiac Arrest Service researchers are listed in Appendix A.