Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 89, April 2015, Pages 86-92
Resuscitation

Clinical Paper
Validation of the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category illness severity score

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to validate the ability of an early post-cardiac arrest illness severity classification to predict patient outcomes.

Methods

The Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category (PCAC) is a 4-level illness severity score that was found to be strongly predictive of outcomes in the initial derivation study. We assigned PCAC scores to consecutive in and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest subjects treated at two tertiary care centers between January 2011 and September 2013. We made assignments prospectively at Site 1 and retrospectively at Site 2. Our primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Inter-rater reliability of retrospective PCAC assessments was assessed. Secondary outcomes were favorable discharge disposition (home or acute rehabilitation), Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge. We tested the association of PCAC with each outcome using unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

We included 607 cardiac arrest patients during the study (393 at Site 1 and 214 at Site 2). Site populations differed in age, arrest location, rhythm, use of hypothermia and distribution of PCAC. Inter-rater reliability of retrospective PCAC assignments was excellent (κ = 0.81). PCAC was associated with survival (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for Site 1: 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27–0.41)) Site 2: 0.32 (95% CI 0.24–0.43) even after adjustment for other clinical variables (adjusted OR Site 1: 0.32 (95% CI 0.25–0.41) Site 2: 0.31 (95% CI 0.22–0.44)). PCAC was predictive of secondary outcomes.

Conclusions

Our results confirm that PCAC is strongly predictive of survival and good functional outcome after cardiac arrest.

Introduction

Over 500,000 Americans suffer a cardiac arrest annually.1 Among those with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) admitted to the hospital, 50–70% die before discharge. Accurate prognostication of survival, good functional outcome and complications after ROSC can inform medical management, surrogate decision-making and resource allocation. Furthermore, a measure that controls for illness severity using early clinical characteristics would allow prospective stratification or retrospective adjustment in research that examines post-resuscitation care in this heterogeneous population. A number of illness severity scores have been developed for use after cardiac arrest, but rely on information that is not readily available to clinicians in the early hours after ROSC.2, 3, 4 Further, these scores are intended for use in either in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but not both.2, 3, 4 We previously derived an illness severity scale, the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category (PCAC), that was strongly associated with survival to hospital discharge and good functional outcome in both IHCA and OHCA.5 This scale was derived for simplicity, focus on objective physical findings, and relevance to post-arrest patients.

The present study was intended to validate the PCAC. We hypothesized that the PCAC would independently predict survival and functional outcome in two populations of patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest even after adjustment for other variables. Since neurological prognostication may lead to a “self-fulfilling prophecy” whereby care is withdrawn based on perceived prognosis,6 we assigned the PCAC prospectively at the center where it had been derived and retrospectively at another center. Thus, our study was intended to prospectively validate the PCAC in a population similar to the derivation cohort while simultaneously providing external validation to avoid the possibility of bias.

Section snippets

Methods

The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board approved this study.

Results

A total of 607 subjects with cardiac arrest were admitted during the study period (393 at Site 1 and 214 at Site 2). Subjects at Site 2 tended to be older, with a higher prevalence of PEA, IHCA, and received therapeutic hypothermia less frequently (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were similar across PCAC levels (Table 1). The frequency of IHCA and VF/VT decreased across PCAC levels while use of hypothermia increased. Inter-rater reliability of retrospective PCAC assignment yielded a kappa

Discussion

We demonstrate that PCAC is strongly associated with survival to hospital discharge and good functional outcome. This association is similar regardless of whether PCAC was assigned prospectively or retrospectively. Importantly, we have confirmed reproducibility of this association in two different hospital settings with demographically distinct patient populations and care practices. Finally, we have demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability when PCAC is retrospectively assigned. Although

Conclusion

PCAC, an illness severity score derived in a previous cohort of IHCA and OHCA patients, predicted survival and functional recovery in two different cohorts. This score can be calculated in all cardiac arrest survivors early after ROSC using information readily available to clinicians. PCAC is a useful method for making early estimates of prognosis and can be used to adjust for injury severity in future studies of post-resuscitation care.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Funding source

None.

References (33)

  • J.C. Hemphill et al.

    Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies

    Emerg Med Clin N Am

    (2009)
  • G. Pachys et al.

    Predictors of long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the impact of Activities of Daily Living and Cerebral Performance Category scores

    Resuscitation

    (2014)
  • V.L. Roger et al.

    Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association

    Circulation

    (2012)
  • C. Adrie et al.

    Predicting survival with good neurological recovery at hospital admission after successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the OHCA score

    Eur Heart J

    (2006)
  • P.S. Chan et al.

    A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest

    Arch Intern Med

    (2012)
  • M.H. Ebell et al.

    Get with the guidelines-resuscitation I. Development and validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    JAMA Intern Med

    (2013)
  • Cited by (114)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.020.

    1

    The list of Post Cardiac Arrest Service researchers are listed in Appendix A.

    View full text