Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 20, Issue 3, March 2020, Pages 391-398
The Spine Journal

Clinical Study
Preoperative MRI predictors of health-related quality of life improvement after microscopic lumbar discectomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.020Get rights and content

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) is a common spinal pathology often treated by microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD), though prior reports have not demonstrated which preoperative MRI factors may contribute to significant clinical improvement after MLD.

PURPOSE

To analyze the MRI characteristics in patients with HNP that predict meaningful clinical improvement in health-related quality of life scores (HRQoL) after MLD.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective clinical and radiological study of patients undergoing MLD for HNP at a single institution over a 2-year period.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Eighty-eight patients receiving MLD treatment for HNP.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cephalocaudal Canal Migration; Canal & HNP Anterior-Posterior (AP) Lengths and Ratio; Canal & HNP Axial Areas and Ratio; Hemi-Canal & Hemi-HNP Axial Areas and Ratio; Disc appearance (black, gray, or mixed); Baseline (BL); and 3-month (3M) postoperative HRQoL scores.

METHODS

Patients >18 years old who received MLD for HNP with BL and 3M HRQoL scores of PROMIS (Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity), ODI, VAS Back, and VAS Leg scores were included. HNP and spinal canal measurements of cephalocaudal migration, AP length, area, hemi-area, and disc appearance were performed using T2 axial and sagittal MRI. HNP measurements were divided by corresponding canal measurements to calculate AP, Area, and Hemi-Area ratios. Using known minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for each ΔHRQoL score, patients were separated into two groups based on whether they reached MCID (MCID+) or did not reach MCID (MCID–). The MCID for PROMIS pain intensity was calculated using a decision tree. A linear regression illustrated correlations between PROMIS vs ODI and VAS Back/Leg scores. Independent t-tests and chi-squared tests were utilized to investigate significant differences in HNP measurements between the MCID+ and MCID– groups.

RESULTS

There were 88 MLD patients included in the study (Age=44.6±14.9, 38.6% female). PROMIS pain interference and pain intensity were strongly correlated with ODI and VAS Back/Leg (R≥0.505), and physical function correlated with ODI and VAS Back/Leg (R=−0.349) (all p<.01). The strongest MRI predictors of meeting HRQoL MCID were gray disc appearance, HNP area (>116.6 mm2), and Hemi-Area Ratio (>51.8%). MCID+ patients were 2.7 times more likely to have a gray HNP MRI signal than a mixed or black HNP MRI signal in five out of six HRQoL score comparisons (p<.025). MCID+ patients had larger HNP areas than MCID– patients had in five out of six HRQoL score comparisons (116.6 mm2±46.4 vs 90.0 mm2±43.2, p<.04). MCID+ patients had a greater Hemi-Area Ratio than MCID– patients had in four out of six HRQoL score comparisons (51.8%±14.7 vs 43.9%±14.9, p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who met MCID after MLD had larger HNP areas and larger Hemi-HNP Areas than those who did not meet MCID. These patients were also 2.7× more likely to have a gray MRI signal than a mixed or black MRI signal. When accounting for HNP area relative to canal area, patients who met MCID had greater Hemi-HNP canal occupation than patients who did not meet MCID. The results of this study suggest that preoperative MRI parameters can be useful in predicting patient-reported improvement after MLD.

Introduction

Lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) is considered to be one of the most prevalent spinal degenerative disorders, often leading to lower back pain and radiculopathy [1,2]. Disc degeneration and herniation vary in severity, as a small protrusion or a complete annular fibrous tear can both contribute to inflammation, nerve root compression, and impending lower back pain [3], [4], [5], [6]. Although there exists a complexity in determining how HNP morphology directly contributes to symptom presentation, it is useful for physicians to visualize this morphology using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when determining the optimal treatment for pain relief [7], [8], [9].

Operative treatment, in the form of microlumbar discectomy (MLD), is commonly utilized to treat HNPs. For patients suffering from back pain and sciatica, MLD is the most common surgical procedure performed in the United States, as over 300,000 discectomy procedures are conducted annually [8,10]. There are also a multitude of patients who opt to receive nonoperative HNP treatment, such as epidural steroid injections or physical therapy, as it serves as a low risk and low cost option [11], [12], [13], [14]. MLD itself is a proven cost-effective treatment option that provides rapid relief of pain, improved quality of life [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. It remains to be determined which radiological characteristics of HNP indicate that patients are more likely to have a favorable short-term outcome after MLD.

With the goal of providing value-based care for patients, surgeons utilize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) metrics to quantify patient reported improvement from surgical intervention. The advent of computer adaptive Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) allows for standardized assessment across health conditions and provides the ability to calculate patient improvement after procedures. Previous studies have explored the benefits of surgical treatment for HNP through the comparison of preoperative and postoperative HRQoL scores including Oswestry disability index, EQ-5D, and SF-12 Physical Component Scores (PCS) [21,22]. Additionally, the high validity that PROMIS carries when measuring patient-reported improvement after HNP surgical treatment has been reported [23]. However, prior reports have not investigated specific preoperative MRI parameters that may contribute to clinically meaningful HRQoL improvement following MLD treatment. Minimal clinical important difference (MCID) values for MLD derived in the literature help quantify significant clinical improvement in patients with surgical HNP [24]. Consequently, using MCID values, this study aimed to meticulously analyze the ability of MRI morphologic characteristics in HNP patients to predict meaningful short-term clinical improvement after MLD using preoperative and postoperative HRQoL metrics.

Section snippets

Study design

This study was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting to a single academic center from March 2017 to August 2018.

Patient population

Inclusion criteria consisted of patients older than 18 years old presenting symptoms, examination, and imaging consistent with primary lumbar disc herniation (HNP) treated through MLD, along with baseline and 3-month HRQoL scores of PROMIS (Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity), ODI, VAS Back, and VAS Leg.

Demographic assessment

The patient cohort contained 88 patients who received MLD treatment. The mean age of the cohort was 44.6 years old, the mean BMI of the cohort was 28.5. The cohort was 38.6% female. The only demographic variable that was significantly different between the MCID+ and MCID– groups was age within the Physical Function comparison, as MCID+ patients were significantly younger than MCID– patients (41.0±13.7 years vs 47.9±15.3 years, p=.028).

Linear regression and overall radiographic analyses

Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong correlation

Discussion

This study systematically analyzed the MRI morphologic characteristics of lumbar HNP to determine the likelihood of achieving MCID following MLD. These radiological characteristics were compared in patients who met and did not meet MCID for MLD reported in recent literature. The results suggest that these radiological characteristics do in fact have clinical significance in patient improvement following MLD. More specifically, patients with large, gray signal HNP with larger percentage of canal

Conclusions

This study investigated the MRI morphologic characteristics in HNP patients that may predict meaningful clinical improvement after MLD, measured by HRQoL metrics. MLD patients who met MCID for the respective HRQoL tests had larger total HNP areas and larger Hemi-HNP Areas than those who did not meet MCID. These patients were also 2.7× more likely to have a gray HNP signal as opposed to having a mixed or black HNP signal. MRI morphologic parameters can aid in predicting the likelihood of

Acknowledgments

There was no source of study funding for the manuscript submitted.

References (33)

  • F Balague et al.

    Non-specific low back pain

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • IW McCall

    Lumbar herniated disks

    Radiol Clin North Am

    (2000)
  • H Kagaya et al.

    Quality of life assessment before and after lumbar disc surgery

    J Orthop Sci

    (2005)
  • R Owen et al.

    PROMIS physical function and pain correlation with ODI and VAS in the surgical lumbar disc herniation patient population

    Spine J

    (2017)
  • E Hansson et al.

    The cost-utility of lumbar disc herniation surgery

    Eur Spine J

    (2007)
  • DF Fardon et al.

    Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2014)
  • H Yang et al.

    Low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation: role of moderately degenerative disc and annulus fibrous tears

    Int J Clin Exp Med

    (2015)
  • B Peng et al.

    Possible pathogenesis of painful intervertebral disc degeneration

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2006)
  • RJ Herzog et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging: use in patients with low back pain or radicular pain

    Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc

    (2003)
  • LW Mysliwiec et al.

    MSU classification for herniated lumbar discs on MRI: toward developing objective criteria for surgical selection

    Eur Spine J

    (2010)
  • EJ Carragee et al.

    A prospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica and lumbar disc herniation. Correlation of outcomes with disc fragment and canal morphology

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1997)
  • SJ Atlas et al.

    The Quebec Task Force classification for spinal disorders and the severity, treatment, and outcomes of sciatica and lumbar spinal stenosis

    Spine

    (1996)
  • A Junge et al.

    Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years’ follow up

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1996)
  • SJ Atlas et al.

    Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2001)
  • AJ Schoenfeld et al.

    Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: evidence-based practice

    Int J Gen Med

    (2010)
  • H Weber

    Spine update the natural history of disc herniation and the influence of intervention

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (1994)
  • FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.

    Author disclosures: CGV: Nothing to disclose. JHM: Nothing to disclose. EWA: Nothing to disclose. EW: Nothing to disclose. DW: Nothing to disclose. DV-M: Nothing to disclose. HA: Nothing to disclose. AB: Nothing to disclose. ME: Nothing to disclose. YK: Royalties: Biomet (Money paid to you); Consulting: Biomet (Money paid to you). JAB: Nothing to disclose. CRF: Consulting: Stryker (amount undisclosed); Speaking and/or Teaching Arrangements: Expert Connect (amount undisclosed). TSP: Stock Ownership: Torus Medical (amount undisclosed); Consulting: Globus Medical (D), Innovasis (B), K2M (B), Medicrea International (B), Nuvasive (B); Research Support (Investigator Salary, Staff/Materials): Cervical Spine Research Society (amount undisclosed). JRS: Consulting: Speaking and/or Teaching Arrangements: Stryker (C); Research Support (Investigator Salary, Staff/Materials): Intrinsic Therapeutics (C). AJB: Consulting: EOS Imaging (B), K2M (B), Medtronic (B), Nuvasive (E); Research Support (Staff and/or materials): Nuvasive (E); Royalties: Altus Spine (B).

    View full text