Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Opinion
  • Published:

Time to rethink management strategies in asymptomatic carotid artery disease

Abstract

Despite level I evidence, no worldwide consensus of opinion exists on how best to manage patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease. In this article, I present the evidence supporting intervention in these patients, highlighting a number of 'inconvenient truths' that challenge the current 'one size fits all' approach to treatment. I will demonstrate that, even if one could identify and treat every individual with a 60–99% asymptomatic stenosis, >95% of all strokes will still occur. Evidence shows that 94% of all carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting procedures in asymptomatic patients in the US are ultimately unnecessary, costing health-care providers US$2 billion annually. Evidence also exists that the risk of stroke in patients treated medically is lower than when the asymptomatic trials were recruiting, challenging the appropriateness of basing contemporary guidelines upon historical data. A small cohort of 'high-risk for stroke' patients will undoubtedly benefit from intervention and our goal must be to identify and treat these individuals, rather than continuing with a policy of mass intervention that benefits very few patients in the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Annual rates of stroke in medically treated patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis stratified for year of publication and baseline severity of stenosis.3,4,5,44,45,54,55,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,78
Figure 2: Prediction of annual risk of late stroke in patients with a | 50–79% or b | 80–99% asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 337, 1235–1243 (1991).

  2. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 325, 445–453 (1991).

  3. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273, 1421–1428 (1995).

  4. Halliday, A. et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363, 1491–1502 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halliday, A. H. et al. 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicenter randomised trial. Lancet 376, 1074–1084 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein, L. B. et al. Guidelines for primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42, 517–584 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brott, T. G. et al. ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Stroke 16, 35–77 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider P. A. & Naylor, A. R. Trans-Atlantic debate. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis—medical therapy alone versus medical therapy plus carotid endarterectomy or stenting? Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 40, 274–281 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider, P. Response to comment regarding trans-Atlantic debate: asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 40, 679 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wholey, M. H., Barbato, J. E. & Al-Khoury, G. E. Treatment of asymptomatic carotid disease with stenting: pro. Sem. Vasc. Surg. 21, 95–99 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Naylor, A. R., Rothwell, P. M. & Bell P. R. Overview of the principal results and secondary analyses from the European and the North American randomised trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 26, 115–129 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnett, H. J., Eliasziw, M., Meldrum, H. E. & Taylor, D. W. Do the facts and figures warrant a 10-fold increase in the performance of carotid endarterectomy on asymptomatic patients? Neurology 46, 603–608 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaturvedi, S. Should the multicenter carotid endarterectomy trials be repeated? Arch. Neurol. 60, 774–775 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perry, J. R., Szalai, J. P. & Norris, J. W. Consensus against both endarterectomy and routine screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Canadian Stroke Consortium. Arch. Neurol. 54, 25–28 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbott, A. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis—It's time to stop operating. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 4, 4–5 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abbott, A. L. Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 40, e573–e583 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huber, T. S. et al. Effect of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study on carotid endarterectomy in Florida. Stroke 29, 1099–1105 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, W. S. et al. Surgical results: a justification of the surgeon selection process for the ACAS trial. The ACAS investigators. J. Vasc. Surg. 23, 323–328 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kresowik T. F. et al. Multistate utilization processes and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy. J. Vasc. Surg. 33, 227–234 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bunch, C. T. & Kresowik, T. F. Can randomized trial outcomes for carotid endarterectomy be achieved in community-wide practice? Semin. Vasc. Surg. 17, 209–213 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rothwell, P. M. & Goldstein, L. B. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke 35, 2425–2427 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brott, T. G. et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 11–23 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Olsen, T. S. et al. European Stroke Initiative recommendations for stroke management—update 2003. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 16, 311–337 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Klein, A., Solomon, C. G. & Hamel, M. B. Management of carotid stenosis—polling results. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, e23 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barnett, H. J., Pelz, D. M. & Lownie, S. P. Reflections by contrarians on the post-CREST evaluation of carotid stenting for stroke prevention. Int. J. Stroke 5, 455–456 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carotid Stenting Guidelines Committee: an Inter-collegiate Committee of the RACP (ANZAN, CSANZ), RACS (ANZSVS) and RANZCR. Guidelines for patient selection and performance of carotid-artery-stenting. Int. Med. J. 41, 344–347 (2011).

  27. Schrooten, M., Fourneau, I., Thijs, V., Verhamme, P. & Nevelsteen, A. Does medical specialty influence the treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A Belgian multidisciplinary survey. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 52, 153–157 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jayasooriya, G. S., Shalhoub, J., Thapar, A. & Davies, A. H. Patient preference survey in the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 53, 1466–1472 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rothwell, P. M. ACST: which subgroups will benefit most from carotid endarterectomy? Lancet 364, 1122–1123 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Young, B. et al. An analysis of perioperative surgical mortality and morbidity in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Stroke 27, 2216–2224 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Henriksson, M., Lundgren, F. & Carlsson, P. Cost-effectiveness of endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Br. J. Surg. 95, 714–720 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liapis, C. D. et al. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 37 (4 Suppl.), 1–19 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chaturvedi, S. et al. Carotid endarterectomy—an evidence-based review: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 65, 794–801 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wholey, M. H. & Barbato, J. E. Is carotid stenting justified in the asymptomatic patient? Perspectives on indications for CAS. Cath. Cardiovasc. Interv. 69, 1081–1083 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baker, W. H., Howard, V. J., Howard, G. & Toole, J. F. for the ACAS Investigators. Effect of contralateral occlusion on long-term efficacy of endarterectomy in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS). Stroke 31, 2330–2334 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Naylor, A. R. What is the current status of invasive treatment of extracranial carotid artery disease? Stroke 42, 2080–2085 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Naylor, A. R., Gaines, P. A. & Rothwell, P. M. Who benefits most from intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: patients or professionals? Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 37, 625–632 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Whitty, C. J., Sudlow, C. L. & Warlow, C. P. Investigating individual subjects and screening populations for asymptomatic carotid stenosis can be harmful. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych. 64, 619–623 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Redberg, R. F. Squandering Medicare's Money. New York Times (25 May 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Naylor AR, Gaines, PA Rothwell PM. Corrigendum to “Who benefits most from intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: patients or professionals?” [Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 37, 625–632 (2009).]. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 38, 657 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McPhee, J. T., Schanzer, A., Messina, L. M. & Eslami, M. H. Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005. J. Vasc. Surg. 48, 1442–1450 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kadoglou, N. P. et al. Intensive lipid-lowering therapy ameliorates novel calcification markers and GSM score in patients with carotid stenosis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 35, 661–668 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Spence, J. D. et al. Effects of intensive medical therapy on microemboli and cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Arch. Neurol. 67, 180–186 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nicolaides, A. N. et al. Severity of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischaemic events: results from the ACSRS study. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 30, 275–284 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sabeti, S. et al. Progression of carotid stenosis detected by duplex ultrasonography predicts adverse outcomes in cardiovascular high-risk patients. Stroke 38, 2887–2894 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kakkos, S. K. et al. Silent embolic infarcts on computed tomography brain scans and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric events in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 49, 902–909 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nicolaides, A. N. et al. Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification. J. Vasc. Surg. 52, 1486–1496 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Griffin, M., Nicolaides, A. & Kyriacou, E. Normalisation of ultrasonic images of atherosclerotic plaques and reproducibility of gray scale median using dedicated software. Int. Angiol. 26, 372–377 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Geroulakos, G. et al. Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution, real-time ultrasonography. Br. J. Surg. 80, 1274–1277 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Griffin, M. B. et al. Juxtaluminal hypoechoic area in ultrasonic images of carotid plaques and hemispheric symptoms. J. Vasc. Surg. 52, 69–76 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tegos, T. J. et al. Types of neurovascular symptoms and carotid plaque ultrasonic textural characteristics. J. Ultrasound. Med. 20, 113–121 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nicolaides, A. N. et al. Effect of image normalization on carotid plaque classification and the risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischemic events: results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Stroke study. Vascular 13, 211–221 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ringelstein, E. B. et al. Consensus on microembolus detection by TCD. International Consensus Group on Microembolus Detection. Stroke 29, 725–729 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Markus, H. S. et al. Asymptomatic embolisation for prediction of stroke in the Asymptomatic Carotid Emboli Study (ACES): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 9, 663–671 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Spence, J. D. et al. Effects of intensive medical therapy on microemboli and cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Arch. Neurol. 67, 180–186 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Takaya, N. et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke 37, 818–823 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Singh, N. et al. Moderate carotid artery stenosis: MR imaging-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage predicts risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events in asymptomatic men. Radiology 252, 502–508 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Johnson, J. M., Kennelly, M. M., Decesare, D., Morgan, S. & Sparrow, A. Natural history of asymptomatic carotid plaque. Arch. Surg. 120, 1010–1012 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chambers, B. R. & Norris, J. W. Outcome in patients with asymptomatic neck bruits. N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 860–865 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Satiani, B., Porter, R. M. Jr., Biggers, K. M. & Das, B. M. Natural history of nonoperated significant carotid stenosis. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2, 271–278 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Norris, J. W., Zhu, C. Z., Bornstein, N. M. & Chambers, B. R. Vascular risks of asymptomatic carotid disease. Stroke 22, 1485–1490 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bock, R. W. et al. The natural history of asymptomatic carotid artery disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 17, 160–169 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hobson, R. W. et al. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 328, 221–227 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Côté, R. et al. Lack of effect of aspirin in asymptomatic patients with carotid bruits and substantial carotid narrowing. The Asymptomatic Cervical Bruit Study Group. Ann. Int. Med. 123, 649–655 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. ECST Trialists Collaborative Group. Risk of stroke in the distribution of an asymptomatic carotid artery. Lancet 345, 209–212 (1995).

  66. Mackey, A. E. et al. Outcome of asymptomatic patients with carotid disease. Asymptomatic Cervical Bruit Study Group. Neurology 48, 896–903 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Inzitari, D. et al. Causes and risk of stroke patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1693–1700 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Goessens, B. M. et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and the risk of new vascular events in patients with manifest arterial disease: the SMART study. Stroke 38, 1470–1475 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Marquardt, L., Geraghty, O. C., Mehta, Z. & Rothwell, P. M. Low risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis on best medical treatment: a prospective, population-based study. Stroke 41, e11–e17 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hankey, G. J. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: how should it be managed? Med. J. Aust. 163, 197–200 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Hertzer, N. R. A personal view: the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study results—read the label carefully. J. Vasc. Surg. 23, 167–171 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Inzitari, D. et al. The causes and risk of stroke patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1693–1700 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for carotid artery stenosis: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann. Int. Med. 147, 854–859 (2007).

  74. Arazi, H. C. et al. Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic stenosis: a decision analysis. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 110, 472–479 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Rothwell, P. M. Carotid stenting: more risky than endarterectomy and often no better than medical treatment alone. Lancet 375, 957–959 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Brott, T. Asymptomatic carotid disease: where do we go from here? Vascular News 4–6 (January 2010).

  77. Abbott, A. L. et al. Embolic signals and prediction of ipsilateral stroke or TIA in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Stroke 36, 1128–1133 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Molloy, J. & Markus, H. S. Asymptomatic embolization predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 30, 1440–1443 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Orlandi, G., Fanucchi, S., Sartucci, F. & Murri, L. Can microembolic signals identify unstable plaques affecting symptomatology in carotid stenosis? Stroke 33, 1744–1746 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Siebler, M. et al. Cerebral microembolism and the risk of ischemia in asymptomatic high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 26, 2184–21886 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Spence, J. D., Tamayo, A., Lownie, S. P., Ng, W. P. & Ferguson, G. G. Absence of microemboli on transcranial Doppler identifies low-risk patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 36, 2373–2378 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naylor, A. Time to rethink management strategies in asymptomatic carotid artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 9, 116–124 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2011.151

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2011.151

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing