Articles
Brain lesion size and location: Effects on motor recovery and functional outcome in stroke patients,☆☆,

https://doi.org/10.1053/mr.2000.3837Get rights and content

Abstract

Chen C-L, Tang F-T, Chen H-C, Chung C-Y, Wong M-K. Brain lesion size and location: effects on motor recovery and functional outcome in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:447-52. Objective: To investigate effects of brain lesion profiles that combined sizes and locations on motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke in hemiplegic patients. Design: Delimiting sizes (a threshold lesion size) of 5 primary locations were identified to establish brain lesion profiles based on magnetic resonance imaging findings 1 month after stroke. Motor and functional outcome were correlated with brain lesion profiles and other brain lesion factors to identify the most dominant factor. Setting: Medical center, rehabilitation department. Participants: Fifty-five hemiplegic patients. Main Outcome Measures: Brunnström's stages and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores were assessed 1 and 6 months after stroke. Results: With delimiting sizes for the cortical, corona radiata, internal capsule, putaminal, and thalamic regions set at 75, 4,.75, 22, and 12cm3, respectively, brain lesion profiles play a dominant role in determining final Brunnström's stages (Spearman's ρ =.861, p <.01) and FIM score (Spearman's ρ =.571, p <.01). Brunnström's and FIM scores had no or only weak negative relationship with either absolute or relative lesion size. Conclusions: These findings may suggest that motor and functional outcomes after stroke correlate with brain lesion profiles (a combination of delimiting sizes and primary locations) more than with absolute or relative lesion sizes only. Delimiting sizes in determining final outcomes varied markedly according to the primary lesion locations. © 2000 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Section snippets

Methods

From November 1995 to March 1997, hemiplegic stroke patients in stable condition who were transferred to the rehabilitation department about 1 month after stroke were recruited for this study. Patients who met the following entry were included: (1) first-ever stroke; (2) hemiplegia; (3) unilateral hemispheric lesions proved by MRI about 1 month after stroke; (4) age older than 40 years; (5) not a cerebellar or brain stem stroke; (6) no significant communication disturbances (able to understand,

Results

The delimiting sizes of brain lesions used to classify BLPs as good or poor varied according to the location: 75cm3 for cortical, 4cm3 for CR,.75cm3 for IC, 22cm3 for putaminal, and 12cm3 for thalamic lesions. The sensitivities of all BLPs were 100%, and the specificities were 75%, 100%, 100%, 93%, and 100% for cortical, CR, IC, putaminal, and thalamic subgroups, respectively (fig 2).

. Delimiting sizes of five primary brain lesion locations determined with boxplots.

The delimiting size chosen for

Discussion

We found that motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke correlated more with BLPs, while they had no or only a weak relationship with either the absolute or relative lesion size. When the delimiting sizes were set at 75cm3 for cortical, 4cm3 for CR, 0.75cm3 for IC, 22cm3 for putaminal, and 12cm3 for thalamic lesions, BLPs could determine motor and functional outcomes. These findings may imply that motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke correlate with BLPs that combined the

Conclusions

In summary, motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke correlated more with BLPs, while they had no or only a weak relationship with either the absolute or relative lesion size. These findings may suggest that motor and functional outcomes after stroke correlated with BLPs (a combination of delimiting sizes and primary locations) more than with the absolute and relative lesion size only. Delimiting sizes in determining final outcomes varied markedly according to the primary locations of

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Y.Y. Wai for her instruction in the interpretation of MR images, W.H. Hong for preparing the computer graphics, and S.W. Chou for reviewing this work.

References (31)

  • P Pantano et al.

    Motor recovery after stroke: morphological and functional brain alterations

    Brain

    (1996)
  • I Miyai et al.

    Patients with stroke confined to basal ganglia have diminished response to rehabilitation efforts

    Neurology

    (1997)
  • AW Dromerick et al.

    Functional outcome for patients with hemiparesis, hemihypesthesia, and hemianopsia: does lesion location matter?

    Stroke

    (1995)
  • S Mori et al.

    Impact of thalamic hematoma on six-month mortality and motor and cognitive functional outcome

    Stroke

    (1995)
  • CMC. Allen

    Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: a prognostic score

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1984)
  • Cited by (153)

    • Investigating secondary white matter degeneration following ischemic stroke by modelling affected fiber tracts

      2022, NeuroImage: Clinical
      Citation Excerpt :

      To illustrate, prior investigations among stroke patients have reported that the extent of CST damage and not infarct size per se are crucial determinants of post-stroke motor ability (Sterr et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2010). Similarly, Chen et al. (2000) examined the impact of brain lesion factors on motor measures in hemiplegic stroke patients and documented that patients with poorer brain lesion profiles had worse motor recovery regardless of lesion location, possibly due to the involvement and destruction of the CST due to Wallerian degeneration. Building on such evidence about the key prognostic value of white matter degeneration, our method can provide a comprehensive set of affected voxels along modelled fibers for finding correlations with behavioral symptoms.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the result of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    ☆☆

    Reprint requests to May-Kuen Wong, MD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5 Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan 333, Taiwan.

    Supplier

    NO LABEL

    a. General Electrical Medical System, P.O. Box 414, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

    View full text