Interventional CardiologyNatural history of small and medium-sized side branches after coronary stent implantation
References (0)
Cited by (80)
Cardiogenic cerebral embolism due to sinus arrest associated with coronary intervention for the right coronary artery: A case report
2022, Journal of Cardiology CasesCitation Excerpt :Of the four patients who sustained SA, a normal sinus rhythm was recovered within three days after SNB occlusion [2]. Another report revealed that in most cases, late spontaneous reperfusion is generally achieved in most occluded side branches [3]. We do note a case report of atrial standstill causing CE in a pediatric case [4].
Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Contemporary Practice
2019, Interventional Cardiology ClinicsCitation Excerpt :Acute side branch occlusion is the most common mechanism of periprocedural MI.11,40 Acute side branch occlusion can be caused by plaque shift from the parent vessel into the side branch, embolization from the parent vessel into the side branch, acute thrombosis in the side branch, dissection involving the side branch, and vasospasm involving the side branch during PCI of the parent vessel.41–45 The origin of a side branch within the diseased segment of the parent vessel and the presence of a significant stenosis (>50%) within the ostium of a side branch are associated with an increased risk of acute side branch occlusion.41–45
The fate of small side branches following drug eluting stent implantation
2016, IJC Heart and VasculatureEccentric morphology of jailed side-branch ostium after stent crossover in coronary bifurcation lesions: A three-dimensional optical coherence tomographic analysis
2015, Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Subsequently, angiographic assessments of jailed side-branch ostium necessarily overestimate the actual stenosis. Previous studies have shown that most side-branch lesions after single-stent crossover implantation do not produce functionally significant stenosis [8,9], and the fate of jailed-looking side-branch ostium is favorable [16,17]. In the present study, post-intervention MLA-OCT was larger than pre-intervention MLA-QCA, and there were no significant decreases in MLA-OCT during the follow-up period.