Original Article

Examining Invasive Bedside Procedure Performance at an Academic Medical Center

Authors: Cynthia Kay, MD, MS, Erica M. Wozniak, MS, Aniko Szabo, PhD, Jeffrey L. Jackson, MD, MPH

Abstract

Objectives: Explore the performance patterns of invasive bedside procedures at an academic medical center, evaluate whether patient characteristics predict referral, and examine procedure outcomes.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational, and retrospective chart review of adults admitted to a general medicine service who had a paracentesis, thoracentesis, or lumbar puncture between February 22, 2013 and February 21, 2014.

Results: Of a total of 399 procedures, 335 (84%) were referred to a service other than the primary team for completion. Patient characteristics did not predict referral status. Complication rates were low overall and did not differ, either by referral status or location of procedure. Model-based results showed a 41% increase in the average length of time until procedure completion for those referred to the hospital procedure service or radiology (7.9 vs 5.8 hours; P < 0.05) or done in radiology instead of at the bedside (9.0 vs 5.8 hours; P < 0.001). The average procedure cost increased 38% ($1489.70 vs $1023.30; P < 0.001) for referred procedures and 56% ($1625.77 vs $1150.98; P < 0.001) for radiology-performed procedures.

Conclusions: Although referral often is the easier option, our study shows its shortcomings, specifically pertaining to cost and time until completion. Procedure performance remains an important skill for residents and hospitalists to learn and use as a part of patient care.

 

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Duffy FD, Holmboe ES. What procedures should internists do? Ann Intern Med 2007;146:392-393.
 
2. American Board of Internal Medicine. Internal medicine policies. http://www.abim.org/certification/policies/imss/im.aspx#procedures. Accessed May 14, 2015.
 
3. Duszak R, Jr Chatterjee AR, Schneider DA. National fluid shifts: fifteen-year trends in paracentesis and thoracentesis procedures. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7:859-864.
 
4. Lenhard A, Moallem M, Marrie RA, et al. An intervention to improve procedure education for internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:288-293.
 
5. Mourad M, Ranji S, Sliwka D. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of a teaching procedure service on the training of internal medicine residents. J Grad Med Educ 2012;4:170-175.
 
6. Mourad M, Kohlwes J, Maselli J, et al. Supervising the supervisors-procedural training and supervision in internal medicine residency. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:351-356.
 
7. Huang GC, Smith CC, Gordon CE, et al. Beyond the comfort zone: residents assess their comfort performing inpatient medical procedures. Am J Med 2006;119:71.e17-e24.
 
8. Tukey MH, Wiener RS. The impact of a medical procedure service on patient safety, procedure quality and resident training opportunities. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29:485-490.
 
9. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, et al. Clinical outcomes after bedside and interventional radiology paracentesis procedures. Am J Med 2013;126:349-356.
 
10. Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, et al. Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
 
11. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-381.
 
12. Barsuk JH, Feinglass J, Kozmic SE, et al. Specialties performing paracentesis procedures at university hospitals: implications for training and certification. J Hosp Med 2014;9:162-168.
 
13. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. What are the biggest drivers of cost in U.S. health care? http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2011/rwjf71331. Published July 2011. Accessed February 5, 2015.
   
15. Schoenman JA, Chockley N. Understanding U.S. health care spending. www.nihcm.org/images/stories/NIHCM-CostBrief-Email.pdf. Published June 2011. Accessed February 5, 2015.
 
16. Butterfield S. Core competencies peripheral in practice. http://www.acphospitalist.org/archives/2010/08/qa.htm. Published August 2010. Accessed March 30, 2015.
 
17. Wigton RS, Alguire P. The declining number and variety of procedures done by general internists: a resurvey of members of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:355-360.
 
18. Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, et al. Caring for the critically ill patient. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA 2000;284:2762-2770.
 
19. Siegal EM, Dressler DD, Dichter JR, et al. Training a hospitalist workforce to address the intensivist shortage in American hospitals: a position paper from the Society of Hospital Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Hosp Med 2012;7:359-364.
 
20. Heisler M. Hospitalists and intensivists: partners in caring for the critically ill-the time has come. J Hosp Med 2010;5:1-3.
 
21. Thakkar R, Wright SM, Alguire P, et al. Procedures performed by hospitalist and non-hospitalist general internists. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:448-452.
 
22. Chung P, Morrison J, Jin L, et al. Resident satisfaction on an academic hospitalist service: time to teach. Am J Med 2002;112:597-601.