Abstract
It is not known whether nominally different olfactory tests actually measure dissimilar perceptual attributes. In this study, we administered nine olfactory tests, including tests of odor identification, discrimination, detection, memory, and suprathreshold intensity and pleasantness perception, to 97 healthy subjects. Aprincipal components analysis performed on the intercorrelation matrix revealed four meaningful components. The first was comprised of strong primary loadings from most of the olfactory test measures, whereas the second was comprised of primary loadings from intensity ratings given to a set of suprathreshold odorant concentrations. The third and fourth components had primary loadings that reflected, respectively, mean suprathreshold pleasantness ratings and a response bias measure derived from a yes/no odor identification signal detection task. In an effort to adjust for potential confounding influences of age, gender, smoking, and years of schooling on the component structure, a matrix of residuals from a multiple regression analysis, which included these variables, was also analyzed. A similar component pattern emerged. Overall, these findings suggest, in healthy subjects spanning a wide age range, that (1) a number of nominally distinct tests of olfactory function are measuring a common source of variance, and (2) some suprathreshold odor intensity and pleasantness rating tests may be measuring sources of variance different from this common source.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amoore, J. E., Ollman, B. G. (1983). Practical test kits for quantitatively evaluating the sense of smell.Rhinology,21, 49–54.
Bartoshuk, L. M. (1978). The psychophysics of taste.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,31, 1068–1077.
Bartoshuk, L. M., Rifkin, B., Marks, L. E., &Bars, P. (1986). Taste and aging.Journal of Gerontology,41, 51–57.
Bromley, S. M., & Doty, R. L. (in press). Odor recognition memory is better under bilateral than unilateral test conditions.Cortex.
Cain, W. S. (1978). History of research on smell. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman,Handbook of perception (pp. 197–229). New York: Academic Press.
Cain,W. S., &Gent,J. F. (1991). Olfactory sensitivity: Reliability, generality, and association with aging.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 382–391.
Cain,W. S., Gent,J. E, Goodspeed, R. B., &Leonard, G. (1988). Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosen-sory Clinical Research Center.Laryngoscope,98, 83–88.
Cain,W.S., &Rabin, R. D. (1989). Comparability of two tests of olfactory functioning.Chemical Senses,14, 479–485.
Corwin, J. (1989). Olfactory identification in hemodialysis: Acute and chronic effects on discrimination and response bias.Neuropsychologia,27, 513–522.
Curcio, C. A., Mcnelly, N. A., &Hinds, J. W. (1985). Aging in the rat olfactory system: Relative stability of piriform cortex contrasts with changes in olfactory bulb and olfactory epithelium.Journal of Comparative Neurology,235, 519–528.
Deems, D. A., &Doty, R. L. (1987). Age-related changes in the phenyl ethyl alcohol odor detection threshold.Transactions of the Pennsylvania Academy of Ophthalmology & Otolaryngology,39, 646–650.
Deems, D. A., Doty, R. L., Settle, R. G., Moore-Gillon, V., Shaman, P., Mester, A. E, Kimmelman, C. P, Brightman, V. J., &Snow, J. B., Jr. (1991). Smell and taste disorders: A study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center (1981–1986).Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery,117, 519–528.
Doty, R. L. (1975). An examination of relationships between the pleasantness, intensity, and concentration of 10 odorous stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 492–496.
Doty, R. L. (1991). Olfactory system. In I. V. Getchell, R. L. Doty, L. M. Bartoshuk, & I. B. Snow, Jr. (Eds.),Smell and taste in health and disease (pp. 175–203). New York: Raven.
Doty,R. L. (1992). Diagnostic tests and assessment.Journal of Head Trauma,7, 47–65.
Doty, R. L., Brugger, W. E., Jurs, P. C., Orndorff, M. A., Snyder, P. J., &Lowry, L. D. (1978). Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans.Physiology & Behavior,20, 175–185.
Doty, R. L., Deems, D., &Stellar, S. (1988). Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: A general deficit unrelated to neurologic signs, disease stage, or disease duration.Neurology,38, 1237–1244.
Doty, R. L., Frye, R. E., &Agrawal, U. (1989). Internal consistency reliability of the fractionated and whole University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 381–384.
Doty, R. L., Reyes, P., &Gregor, T. (1987). Presence of both odor identification and detection deficits in Alzheimer’s disease.Brain Research Bulletin,18, 597–600.
Doty, R. L., Shaman, P., &Dann, M. (1984). Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: A standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function.Physiology & Behavior,32, 489–502.
Engen, L. (1983).The perception of odors. New York: Academic Press.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983).Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Green, J. E., Songsanand, P., Peretz, S., Hsu, P., Corkin, S., &Growden, J. H. (1989). Dissociation between basic and high order olfactory capacities in Alzheimer’s disease. In R. I. Wurtman, S. H. Corkin.T H. Growden, & E. Ritter-Walker (Eds.),Proceedings of the Fifth Meeting of the International Study Group on Pharmacological Memory Disorders Associated with Aging (pp. 449–455). Cambridge, MA: Center for Brain Sciences and Metabolism Charitable Trust.
Guilford, J. P. (1954).Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Harper, R., Bate Smith, E. C., &Land, D. G. (1968).Odour description and odour classification. New York: Elsevier.
Jafek, B. w., Eller, P. M., Esses, B. A., Moran, D. T. (1989). Posttraumatic anosmia: Ultrastructural correlates.Archives of Neurology,46, 300–304.
Jones-Gotman, M., &Zatorre, R. J. (1988). Olfactory identification deficits in patients with focal cerebral excision.Neuropsychologia,26, 387–400.
Köoster, E. P. (1975). Human psychophysics in olfaction. In D. G. Moulton, A. Turk, & J. W. Johnston, Jr. (Eds.),Methods in olfactory research (pp. 345–374). New York: Academic Press.
Lawless, H. T., &Malone, G. J. (1986). The discriminative efficiency of common scaling methods.Journal of Sensory Studies,1, 85–98.
Mair, R. G., Doty, R. L., Kelly, K. M., Wilson, C. S., Langlais, P.J., Mcentee, W. J., &Vollmecke, T. A. (1986). Multimodal sensory discrimination deficits in Korsakoff’s psychosis.Neuropsychologia,24, 831–839.
Martinez, B. A., Cain, W. S., Dewijk, R. A., Spencer, D. D., Novelly, R. A., &Saas, K. J. (1993). Olfactory functioning before and after temporal lobe resection for intractable seizures.Neuropsychology,7, 351–363.
Moncrieff, R. W. (1966).Odour preferences. New York: Wiley.
Moran, D. T., Jafek, B. w., Rowley, J. C., &Eller, P. M. (1985). Electron microscopy of olfactory epithelia in two patients with anosmia.Archives of Otolaryngology,111, 122–126.
Nakashima, T., Kimmelman, C. P.,&Snow, J. B., JR. (1984). Structure of human fetal and adult olfactory neuroepithelium.Archives of Otolaryngology,110, 641–646.
Potter, H., &Butters, N. (1980). An assessment of olfactory deficits in patients with damage to prefrontal cortex.Neuropsychologia,18,621–628.
Rovee, C. K., Cohen, R. Y., &Shlapack, W. (1975). Life span stability in olfactory sensitivity.Developmental Psychology,11, 311–318.
Rozeboom, W. W. (1982). The determinacy of common factors in large item domains.Psychometrika,47, 281–295.
Schiffman, S. S. (1974). Physicochemical correlates of olfactory quality.Science,185, 112–117.
Smith, R. S., Doty, R. L., Burlingame, G. K., &Mckeown, D. A. (1993). Smell and taste function in the visually impaired.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 649–655.
Snodgrass, J. C; &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.
Spearman, C. (l904).“General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured.American Journal of Psychology,15,201–293.
Stevens, J. C., Cain,W. S., &Burke, R. J. (1988). Variability of olfactory thresholds.Chemical Senses,13, 643–653.
Takagi, S. F. (1989).Human of faction. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Trojanowski, J. Q., Newman, P. D., Hill, W. D., &Lee, V. M.-Y. (1991). Human olfactory epithelium in normal aging, Alzheimer’s disease, and other degenerative disorders.Journal of Comparative Neurology,310, 365–376.
Valentin, G. (1848).Lehrbuch der Physiologie des Menschen. Braunschweig.
Vollmecke, T. A., &Doty, R. L. (1985). Development of the Picture Identification Test (PIT): A research companion to the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.Chemical Senses,10, 413–414.
Wenzel, W. (1948). Techniques in olfactometry.Psychological Bulletin,45, 231–246.
West, S. E., & Doty, R. L. (in press). The influence of epilepsy and temporal lobe resection on olfactory function: A review.Epilepsia.
Whipple, G. M. (1914).Manual of mental and physical tests. Baltimore, MD: Warwick & York.
Wilkinson, L. (1990).SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.
Yoshida, M. (1984). Correlation analysis of detection threshold data for “standard test” odors.Bulletin of the Faculty of Science & Engineering of Chuo University,27, 343–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant POI DC 00161 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders and Grant AG 08148 from the National Institute on Aging.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doty, R.L., Smith, R., Mckeown, D.A. et al. Tests of human olfactory function: Principal components analysis suggests that most measure a common source of variance. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 701–707 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208363
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208363