Review
Aspirin and Clopidogrel Resistance

https://doi.org/10.4065/81.4.518Get rights and content

Despite aspirin's and clopidogrel's proven benefit in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events, recurrent CV events still occur in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Many of these patients are resistant or only partially responsive to the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel, as determined by standard platelet assays. However, current clinical guidelines do not support routine screening for aspirin or clopidogrel resistance, in part because determination of the most appropriate screening test has not been established. This review attempts to (1) describe the phenomena of clinical aspirin and clopidogrel resistance (ie, treatment failure), (2) discuss the complexity of defining and identifying aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, (3) identify factors that may be responsible for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, (4) outline several standard platelet function assays and their limitations, and (5) describe potential new antiplatelet therapies that may benefit aspirin- or clopidogrel-resistant patients.

Section snippets

ASPIRIN RESISTANCE

The term aspirin resistance has been used to describe the inability of aspirin to inhibit platelet aggregation as demonstrated by platelet function tests (eg, biochemical aspirin resistance).9 The term has also been used to describe the occurrence of CV events despite therapeutic aspirin intake (eg, clinical treatment failure). No consensus exists on whether the definition should be based on laboratory evidence, clinical outcomes, or both. The clinical importance of biochemical aspirin

MECHANISMS OF ASPIRIN RESISTANCE

The mechanisms of aspirin resistance are poorly understood and are likely to be multifactorial (Figure 2).27 Multiple factors affect platelet aggregation, including patient posture, time of day, exercise, and serum cholesterol levels.28 Additionally, cigarette smoking stimulates platelet aggregation and blunts the effect of aspirin.29 Moreover, drug-drug interactions may reduce the efficacy of aspirin. For example, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs block aspirin's access to the active site

THIENOPYRIDINES

The thienopyridines, clopidogrel and ticlopidine, irreversibly bind the platelet surface P2Y12 ADP receptor, thereby inhibiting ADP-induced platelet activation (Figure 1). Although ticlopidine has proven superiority to aspirin in the prevention of atherothrombosis,43 clopidogrel is more widely used than ticlopidine because it offers better safety and tolerability43 with similar efficacy.44

Patients who experience an ACS or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have a lower risk of

LABORATORY TOOLS TO SCREEN FOR EFFICACY OF ANTIPLATELET AGENTS

The most appropriate laboratory test for assessing aspirin and clopidogrel resistance has not yet been established.67 Four of the more common techniques for assessing platelet function include (1) bleeding time; (2) optical aggregometry, which measures platelet aggregation in plasma after exposure to substrates such as arachidonic acid, epinephrine, collagen, or ADP; (3) PFA-100 (Dade-Behring, Deerfield, Ill), which measures high shear stress-dependent platelet aggregation in whole blood; and

POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVES FOR THE ANTIPLATELET-RESISTANT PATIENT

One potential alternative or addition to aspirin or thienopyridine therapy is cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor approved for the treatment of intermittent claudication. In patients who have had a cerebrovascular event, cilostazol monotherapy significantly reduces the risk of recurrent stoke.70 The addition of cilostazol to aspirin or clopidogrel does not result in further bleeding time prolongation, suggesting safety of the combination therapy.71 In the Cilostazol for Restenosis Trial

CONCLUSION

Many issues remain unresolved regarding the definition, identification, and clinical importance of resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel. Given these limitations, no established consensus exists of whether aspirin- or clopidogrel-resistant patients should discontinue their antiplatelet regimen or whether additional therapy, such as cilostazol, should be added. Future studies will establish whether patients receiving antiplatelet agents should undergo platelet function studies to assess the

REFERENCES (77)

  • DW Taylor et al.

    Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • PY Lee et al.

    Low-dose aspirin increases aspirin resistance in patients with coronary artery disease

    Am J Med

    (2005)
  • C Patrono et al.

    Platelet-active drugs: the relationships among dose, effectiveness, and side effects

    Chest

    (2001)
  • AA Weber et al.

    Cyclooxygenase-2 in human platelets as a possible factor in aspirin resistance [letter]

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • S Wong et al.

    Aspirin resistance in cardiovascular disease: a review

    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg

    (2004)
  • VL Serebruany et al.

    Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • WM Samara et al.

    The difference between clopidogrel responsiveness and posttreatment platelet reactivity

    Thromb Res

    (2005)
  • TA Nguyen et al.

    Resistance to clopidogrel: a review of the evidence

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • VL Serebruany et al.

    Statins do not affect platelet inhibition with clopidogrel during coronary stenting [letter]

    Atherosclerosis

    (2001)
  • NS Nicholson et al.

    Assessment of platelet function assays

    Am Heart J

    (1998)
  • AL Frelinger et al.

    Clopidogrel linking evaluation of platelet response variability to mechanism of action

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • JB Smith et al.

    Aspirin selectively inhibits prostaglandin production in human platelets

    Nat New Biol

    (1971)
  • GJ Roth et al.

    Acetylation of prostaglandin synthase by aspirin

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1975)
  • M Hamberg et al.

    Thromboxanes: a new group of biologically active compounds derived from prostaglandin endoperoxides

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1975)
  • Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration

    Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients [published correction appears in BMJ. 2002;324:141]

    BMJ

    (2002)
  • P Mehta

    Aspirin in the prophylaxis of coronary artery disease

    Curr Opin Cardiol

    (2002)
  • MS Lauer

    Clinical practice: aspirin for primary prevention of coronary events

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • PA Howard

    Aspirin resistance

    Ann Pharmacother

    (2002)
  • GJ Hankey et al.

    Aspirin resistance [editorial]

    BMJ

    (2004)
  • MJ Alberts et al.

    Antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with cerebrovascular disease

    Stroke

    (2004)
  • T Chakroun et al.

    In vitro aspirin resistance detected by PFA-100 closure time: pivotal role of plasma von Willebrand factor

    Br J Haematol

    (2004)
  • C Cerletti et al.

    Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between two low dosages of aspirin may affect therapeutic outcomes

    Clin Pharmacokinet

    (2003)
  • RG Hart et al.

    Aspirin dosage and thromboxane synthesis in patients with vascular disease

    Pharmacotherapy

    (2003)
  • N Zimmermann et al.

    Functional and biochemical evaluation of platelet aspirin resistance after coronary artery bypass surgery

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • JW Eikelboom et al.

    Aspirin-resistant thromboxane biosynthesis and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events

    Circulation

    (2002)
  • MR Mueller et al.

    Variable platelet response to low-dose ASA and the risk of limb deterioration in patients submitted to peripheral arterial angioplasty

    Thromb Haemost

    (1997)
  • MR Buchanan et al.

    Individual variation in the effects of ASA on platelet function: implications for the use of ASA clinically

    Can J Cardiol

    (1995)
  • CM Helgason et al.

    Development of aspirin resistance in persons with previous ischemic stroke

    Stroke

    (1994)
  • Cited by (114)

    • Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Stroke

      2021, Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management
    • Review of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in peripheral arterial disease

      2017, Journal of Vascular Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is the case with AR-measuring assays, for which in the same cohort of stable CAD patients, there was poor correlation among six different assays, with an AR rate varying from 6.7% to 59.5%.24 To add further complexity to platelet function tests, the majority of assay-specific resistance cutoff values are determined arbitrarily.4 Table I summarizes the most common platelet function assays and their characteristics.24,25

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text