Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis?

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Jul;4(4):329-33. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 8.

Abstract

The management of multiple sclerosis is becoming increasingly complex with the emergence of new and more effective disease-modifying therapies (DMT). We propose a new treatment paradigm that individualises treatment based on a choice between two interchangeable therapeutic strategies of maintenance-escalation or induction therapy. We propose treating- to-target of no evident disease activity (NEDA) as defined using clinical and MRI criteria. This algorithm requires active monitoring with a rebaselining MRI, at a point in time after the specific DMT concerned has had sufficient time to work, and at least annual MRI studies to monitor for subclinical relapses. Disease activity on the maintenance-escalation therapy arm of the algorithm indicates a sub-optimal treatment response and should trigger a discussion about switching, or escalating, therapy or the consideration of switching to the induction therapy arm of the algorithm. In comparison, disease activity on an induction therapy arm would be an indication for retreatment or a switch to the maintenance-escalation therapy arm. We envisage the definition of NEDA evolving with time as new technological innovations are adopted into clinical practice, for example the normalisation of whole, or regional, brain atrophy rates and cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament levels.

Keywords: Disease activity free; Disease modifying therapy; Multiple sclerosis; NEDA; No evident disease activity; Treating to target.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Disease Progression
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Multiple Sclerosis / pathology
  • Multiple Sclerosis / physiopathology
  • Multiple Sclerosis / therapy*
  • Precision Medicine / methods
  • Treatment Outcome