End-to-end versus end-to-side arterial anastomosis patency in microvascular surgery

Microsurgery. 1998;18(2):125-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2752(1998)18:2<125::aid-micr11>3.0.co;2-#.

Abstract

The patency rates of microsurgical end-to-end and end-to-side anastomosis in the rat carotid artery were studied. Seventy end-to-end and seventy end-to-side arterial anastomoses, using 10-0 nylon interrupted sutures, were performed on 140 Sprague-Dawley rats. Findings indicated 100% patency in end-to-end as well as end-to-side immediately and 1 week post-anastomosis. This investigation suggests that there is no significant advantage between the methods studied based on vessel patency alone. The decision to perform an end-to-end vs. an end-to-side arterial anastomosis should be based upon the clinical circumstances encountered, since no significant difference in patency rates exists.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anastomosis, Surgical / methods*
  • Animals
  • Carotid Arteries / surgery*
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Male
  • Microsurgery / methods*
  • Rats
  • Rats, Sprague-Dawley
  • Vascular Patency / physiology*
  • Vascular Surgical Procedures / methods