American College of Radiology Diagnostic Efficacy Studies

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 Jul;131(1):173-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.131.1.173.

Abstract

Questions about costs and benefits of radiologic diagnostic methods have lead to the formation of a standing American College of Radiology Committee on Efficacy. In the past several years this committee has defined a hierarchy of efficacies associated with radiographic procedures and developed methods for assigning a numerical value to diagnostic efficacy. A national study of common x-ray examinations in the emergency setting has been conducted. These studies suggest that diagnostic thinking of clinicians was influenced by the results of the x-ray procedures they requested in more than 92% of cases. Medicolegal consideration were a prime concern of the clinician only 6% of the time overall when selecting the most frequent radiologic procedures conducted in hospitals. Considerable uncertainty about clinical diagnoses was typically present at the time radiologic examinations were requested; three-fourths of the time the most important diagnosis under consideration was judged to be less likely after x-ray examination than before. About one-eighth of the time the radiographic information focused attention on a new "most important" diagnosis. The committee plans further studies to include other imaging modalities and practive settings.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Diagnosis
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Humans
  • Methods
  • Radiography* / economics
  • Radiology*
  • Societies, Medical*
  • United States