Prior studies have found a 3%–6% clinically significant error rate in radiology practice. We
set out to assess discrepancy rates between subspecialty-trained university-based …

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prior studies have found a 2%–8% clinically significant
error rate in radiology practice. We compared discrepancy rates of studies interpreted by …

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to determine discrepancy rates in radiology
residents' interpretations of CT and MRI studies of the head, neck, and spine and to attempt …

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diagnostic errors in radiology are classified as perception
or interpretation errors. This study determined whether specific conditions differed when …

Please see the Editorial Comment by Ibrahim S. Tuna discussing this article. Chinese
(audio/PDF) and Spanish (audio/PDF) translations are available for this article's abstract …

AIM: To assess the impact on patient management of formal neuroradiology “second
reading” of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images …

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility and clinical impact of
second‐opinion interpretations of outside neuroimaging studies by oncologic …

Background: An increasing number of neurologists in District General Hospitals (DGHs) rely
on local neuroimaging reports from general radiologists. Aim: To determine the level of …

Productivity in Academic Neuroradiology: A National Survey of Neuroradiology Division
Chiefs.” 1 Many studies have reported on the correlation between diagnostic errors and an …

Diagnostic accuracy in neurology frequently depends on clinical assessment and
neuroimaging interpretation. We assessed neuroimaging discrepancy rates in reported …