BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prior studies have found a 2%–8% clinically significant
error rate in radiology practice. We compared discrepancy rates of studies interpreted by …

Prior studies have found a 3%–6% clinically significant error rate in radiology practice. We
set out to assess discrepancy rates between subspecialty-trained university-based …

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to determine discrepancy rates in radiology
residents' interpretations of CT and MRI studies of the head, neck, and spine and to attempt …

Please see the Editorial Comment by Ibrahim S. Tuna discussing this article. Chinese
(audio/PDF) and Spanish (audio/PDF) translations are available for this article's abstract …

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diagnostic errors in radiology are classified as perception
or interpretation errors. This study determined whether specific conditions differed when …

Background and Purpose Medical errors can result in significant morbidity and mortality. The
goal of our study is to evaluate correlation between shift volume and errors made by …

Aim To assess and quantify the relationship between trainee reporting and radiology errors.
Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of the 100 most recent cases reviewed by a …

AIM To quantify and correlate the diagnostic error rates in radiological interpretation with the
experience of the attending neuroradiologist at a tertiary academic medical centre …

AIM: To assess the impact on patient management of formal neuroradiology “second
reading” of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images …

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility and clinical impact of
second‐opinion interpretations of outside neuroimaging studies by oncologic …