Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLetter

Reply:

Prof. E.L. Gasparetto, F. Nirenberg and Prof. J. Marcondes de Souza
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2009, 30 (6) e84; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1584
Prof. E.L. Gasparetto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Nirenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prof. J. Marcondes de Souza
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

We thank Dr. Palma for the interest in our article about the role of susceptibility-weighted MR phase imaging (SWI) for the evaluation of patients with cerebral cavernous malformation1 and for the additional comments about the potential false-positives in these patients. Although the clinical information and the careful evaluation of the SWI images reconstructed with the minimum intensity projection (mIP) technique could suggest the diagnosis of pneumoencephalus in the case reported, false-positives are not uncommon on SWI. As stated in the letter and also properly discussed in a previous study,2 because SWI has extremely high sensitivity for the detection of magnetic susceptibility effects, many paramagnetic, ferromagnetic, and diamagnetic substances can cause inhomogeneities on the magnetic field and, as a result, loss of signal intensity on SWI. We recently had a 44-year-old female patient who underwent MR imaging for “follow-up of brain tumor.” She had multiple extra-axial low signal intensity foci on SWI, similar to the case shown by Dr. Palma. In fact, the review of previous examinations and additional sequences demonstrated that these foci represented fat because of the rupture of an epidermoid tumor (Fig 1). One option to avoid false-positives when evaluating the SWI sequence is to study not only the mIP reconstructed images, but also the magnitude and phase images. Nowadays, we evaluate these images in all of the patients with positive imaging findings on SWI sequence, and in several instances, they have been useful in doubtful cases.

  Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A, SWI sequence (TR, 40 ms; TE, 49 ms) demonstrates multiple extra-axial low signal intensity foci, even inside the ventricles. B, T1-weighted image (TR, 475 ms; TE, 9.4 ms) shows that these foci have high signal intensity, some of them with a halo of low signal intensity (chemical shift artifacts), representing fat. Note the left frontotemporal craniotomy, which was performed for partial resection of an epidermoid tumor. The diagnosis of rupture of an epidermoid tumor was then suggested.

References

  1. de Souza JM, Domingues RC, Cruz LC Jr, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging for the evaluation of patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations: a comparison with T2-weighted fast spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:154–58
  2. Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;1:19–30
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire