Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
ReplyLETTER

Reply:

D. Shlapak, D.K. Kim, F.E. Diehn, J.C. Benson, V.T. Lehman, G.B. Liebo, J.M. Morris, P.P. Morris, J.T. Verdoom and C.M. Carr
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7126
D. Shlapak
aDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Shlapak
D.K. Kim
bDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.K. Kim
F.E. Diehn
cDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F.E. Diehn
J.C. Benson
dDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.C. Benson
V.T. Lehman
eDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V.T. Lehman
G.B. Liebo
fDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G.B. Liebo
J.M. Morris
gDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.M. Morris
P.P. Morris
hDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.P. Morris
J.T. Verdoom
iDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.T. Verdoom
C.M. Carr
jDepartment of RadiologyMayo ClinicRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.M. Carr

Thank you very much for such a thoughtful and timely letter. It brings up the important topic of CSF dynamics within the “subdural” space, which has not been fully elucidated. Diffusion of subdural contrast into the thecal sac is certainly interesting; we do not yet know if it is from the disruption of the inner layer at the puncture site, or if intrathecal distribution results from the natural egress passage of any subdural fluid.

In a typical CT myelogram for spinal stenosis evaluation, rescanning patients after an hour in cases of subdural injection to see whether the contrast diffuses intrathecally is a very acceptable option. This is especially true during the current pandemic setting, as the authors mentioned.

While most CT myelograms performed for spinal stenosis can be diagnostic if the CSF is appreciably denser than the neural elements, the evaluation of spinal CSF leaks on CT myelogram is extremely dependent on a high concentration of intrathecal contrast. This is especially true with CSF-venous fistulas, where the findings are often subtle even with maximal contrast attenuation. Therefore, waiting an hour for subdural injections to become intrathecal while contrast resorption from the CSF to the venous system is occurring would likely result in submaximal opacification of intrathecal CSF and markedly decrease the diagnostic yield.

Thank you again for the letter and great efforts to optimize patient care in a difficult time for the medical community.

  • © 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire