Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Abstract

Locating the central sulcus: comparison of MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic functional methods.

D F Sobel, C C Gallen, B J Schwartz, T A Waltz, B Copeland, S Yamada, E C Hirschkoff and F E Bloom
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 1993, 14 (4) 915-925;
D F Sobel
Division of Neuroradiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA 92037.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C C Gallen
Division of Neuroradiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA 92037.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B J Schwartz
Division of Neuroradiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA 92037.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T A Waltz
Division of Neuroradiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA 92037.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B Copeland
Division of Neuroradiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA 92037.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Yamada
Division of Neuroradiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA 92037.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E C Hirschkoff
Division of Neuroradiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA 92037.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F E Bloom
Division of Neuroradiology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA 92037.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE To compare MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) functional methods in locating the central sulcus.

METHODS Eleven healthy subjects and five patients with focal cerebral lesions were studied. The central sulcus was located anatomically with MR by two independent observers using axial vertex and sagittal (midline and lateral) images. Locations via the MEG functional method were based on detecting the somatosensory-evoked magnetic fields elicited by painless tactile stimuli.

RESULTS The axial method yielded the most consistent interrater results, with complete agreement in 76% of sections in both control subjects and patients. The intermethod discordance of the sagittal midline and lateral methods was 32% in control subjects and 33% in patients. The concordance of MR and MEG methods ranged from 55% to 84% in control subjects and 65% to 67% in patients.

CONCLUSION MR anatomic techniques can usually identify the central sulcus, but in the presence of anatomic distortion, the MEG functional method adds significant information.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 14, Issue 4
1 Jul 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Locating the central sulcus: comparison of MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic functional methods.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Locating the central sulcus: comparison of MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic functional methods.
D F Sobel, C C Gallen, B J Schwartz, T A Waltz, B Copeland, S Yamada, E C Hirschkoff, F E Bloom
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 1993, 14 (4) 915-925;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Locating the central sulcus: comparison of MR anatomic and magnetoencephalographic functional methods.
D F Sobel, C C Gallen, B J Schwartz, T A Waltz, B Copeland, S Yamada, E C Hirschkoff, F E Bloom
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 1993, 14 (4) 915-925;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The "White Gray Sign" Identifies the Central Sulcus on 3T High-Resolution T1-Weighted Images
  • Challenges in Identifying the Foot Motor Region in Patients with Brain Tumor on Routine MRI: Advantages of fMRI
  • The U Sign: Tenth Landmark to the Central Region on Brain Surface Reformatted MR Imaging
  • Influence of magnetic source imaging for planning intracranial EEG in epilepsy
  • Magnetoencephalographic representation of the sensorimotor hand area in cases of intracerebral tumour
  • Comparison of memory fMRI response among normal, MCI, and Alzheimer's patients
  • Referred phantom sensations and cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury in humans
  • Quantification and Reproducibility of Tracking Cortical Extent of Activation by Use of Functional MR Imaging and Magnetoencephalography
  • The Effect of Brain Tumors on BOLD Functional MR Imaging Activation in the Adjacent Motor Cortex: Implications for Image-guided Neurosurgery
  • Functional MR Imaging Activation after Finger Tapping Has a Shorter Duration in the Basal Ganglia Than in the Sensorimotor Cortex
  • Functional Connectivity in the Thalamus and Hippocampus Studied with Functional MR Imaging
  • Decreased BOLD Functional MR Activation of the Motor and Sensory Cortices Adjacent to a Glioblastoma Multiforme: Implications for Image-Guided Neurosurgery
  • Location of the Primary Motor Cortex in Schizencephaly
  • Referred phantom sensations and cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury in humans
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire