Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleEDITORIAL

Incidental Detection of Hippocampal Sclerosis

Alex Mamourian
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 1999, 20 (9) 1575-1576;
Alex Mamourian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The MR examination of medial temporal structures has recently been pushed to the limits of current technology, with some hope of uncovering the secrets of intractable epilepsy. The specific MR imaging features of one important source of seizures, mesial temporal sclerosis, have been well described. These include a small hippocampus with abnormal signal on T2-weighted scans, but many other findings in the temporal lobes and limbic system have been reported.

These careful investigations of brain anatomy have occurred without a critical examination of the hippocampus of nonepileptics to determine if these findings might be encountered as incidental findings in healthy patients, or at least in patients without epilepsy. This is not a simple task because high-resolution imaging in the coronal plane is essential for this diagnosis. In this issue of the AJNR, Moore et al (page 1609) report on the temporal lobe findings in 207 cases without known epilepsy in an attempt to determine the positive predictive value of the MR findings of mesial sclerosis.

In this retrospective study of patients with hearing loss, the authors identified two patients out of the 207 with abnormal hippocampal formations. In both cases, further investigation of the clinical history uncovered a history of epilepsy. The other 205 patients had normal medial temporal structures; ie, they found no cases with hippocampal abnormalities without epilepsy. The authors conclude that the findings of mesial sclerosis are “uncommon and significant.”

Although their observations are impressive, one should be aware of two important caveats. The first concern is how representative is the study sample? There can be little argument that this finding is uncommon. Of the patients referred from our epilepsy service with a suspected epileptogenic focus, MR studies are abnormal in approximately 25% of cases. With this experience in patients at risk, there can be little doubt that the occurrence of hippocampal abnormalities will be considerably less among nonepileptics. With an uncommon imaging finding, an important question is the number and composition of the study cases needed in order to reach a valid conclusion. It is essential that the cases in the study group are representative of the patient population (1). Ideally, this control group should include cases with a different disease process in the same anatomic location as well as patients with the same disease (epilepsy) but of nontemporal lobe origin. The outcome might have been different if the authors had decided to study patients with previous head trauma, near drowning, or herpes encephalitis, because all of these groups have a much higher likelihood of having temporal lobe abnormalities.

The cases of near drowning or anoxia are particularly relevant because these patients may have abnormalities limited to the hippocampus, attributable to a phenomenon referred to as “selective vulnerability.” It has been long recognized that specific regions of the brain might be injured with even brief episodes of hypoxia. Although vascular causes have been considered, the characteristic injuries seen in certain circumstances could only be explained by some pathophysiologic process unique to those cells. Selective vulnerability can be evident in many regions of the brain but is most commonly seen in the CA 1 sector of the hippocampus and the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. This phenomenon has been attributed to the local release of excitatory neurotransmitters, and one likely candidate is glutamate, with secondary influx of calcium into the postsynaptic cells and subsequent injury. Another disease besides epilepsy and hypoxia that may selectively involve the hippocampus is limbic encephalitis, a rare paraneoplastic disease that in many respects resembles herpes encephalitis histologically.

The second caveat concerns the degree of statistical precision. A useful rule of thumb for estimating the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval around the probability of a rare event after N negative observations is 3/N (2). Using the data from this study, assuming that all of the patients with normal MR studies did not have epilepsy, the upper bound on the false-positive rate is 1.5% or 3/205; the lower bound on the specificity is 98.5%. Although this value is high, it must be considered in the context of the prior probability of disease. Among patients with suspected lesional epilepsy in whom the probability of finding disease is at least 10%, this specificity of 98.5% would yield a positive predictive value of at least 96%. In the general population, however, where the prevalence of epilepsy is approximately 8/1000, the positive predictive value could be no more than 40%. In fact, even at a prior probability of .008, a positive predictive value of 89% would require a specificity of 99.9%. To achieve this lower-bound estimate of 99.9%, Moore et al would have needed to review scans of 3000 subjects without finding a single hippocampal abnormality that was not associated with epilepsy. Although this would be a substantial undertaking, it would be of considerable interest to include some subjects with a history of anoxia in any such study group.

The authors are to be commended for their use of an existing data set to address this problem—a sort of scientific recycling. Their study provides solid evidence that the findings of mesial temporal sclerosis are significant in the clinical setting of epilepsy. The sample size, however, is neither large nor diverse enough to predict the true significance of these findings in the general population.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank William Black, MD for his considerable assistance with this editorial.

References:

  1. ↵
    Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978;229:926-929
  2. ↵
    Hanley JA, Lippman HA. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right?—interpreting zero numerators. JAMA 1983;249:1743-1745
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 20, Issue 9
1 Oct 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incidental Detection of Hippocampal Sclerosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Incidental Detection of Hippocampal Sclerosis
Alex Mamourian
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 1999, 20 (9) 1575-1576;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Incidental Detection of Hippocampal Sclerosis
Alex Mamourian
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 1999, 20 (9) 1575-1576;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • References:
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The No Surprises Act: What Neuroradiologists Should Know
  • Call to Action: Women in Neuroradiology’s Group (WINNERS)—Is There a Need?
  • The Z-Shift: A Need for Quality Management System Level Testing and Standardization in Neuroimaging Pipelines
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire