Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Offers No Advantage over Routine Noncontrast MR Imaging in the Detection of Vertebral Metastases

References

1. ↵
   Porter BA, Shields AF, Olson DO. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 1986;24:269-289

   PubMed
2. ↵
   Ricci C, Cova M, Kang YS, et al. Normal age-related patterns of cellular and fatty bone marrow distribution in the axial skeleton: MR imaging study. Radiology 1990;177:83-88

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Daffner RH, Lupetin AR, Dash N, Deeb ZL, Sefczek RJ, Shapiro RL. MRI in the detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:353-358

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 1998;207:349-356

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. Vogler JB, Murphy WA. Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 1988;168:679-693

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Castillo M, Malko JA, Hoffman JC. The bright intervertebral disk: an indirect sign of abnormal spinal bone marrow on T1-weighted MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:23-26

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   Carmody RF, Yang PJ, Seely GW, Seeger JF, Unger EC, Johnson JE. Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography. Radiology 1989;173:225-229

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Rahmouni A, Divine M, Mathieu D, et al. Detection of multiple myeloma involving the spine: efficacy of fat-suppression and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:1049-1052

   PubMed