Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
EditorialEDITORIAL

Tetrahedral Gradient Diffusion-Encoding Scheme with Line Scan Imaging

Pradip M. Pattany
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2003, 24 (1) 2-3;
Pradip M. Pattany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

MR images that represent water diffusion through tissue can be produced by analyzing spin dephasing and signal intensity loss caused by random motion along magnetic field gradients. Diffusion-weighted imaging has been shown to enable detection of stroke early after the thromboembolic event, and anisotropic diffusion in white matter is of particular interest in studying the structural integrity of the axons in certain pathologic conditions.

Using conventional clinical imagers, three sets of diffusion-weighted images are obtained by applying diffusion encoding along each of the three orthogonal axes of the imager individually. One set of images without diffusion encoding is also obtained. The data are then used to generate apparent diffusion coefficient maps for quantitative analysis. The b values attained with this scheme are dependent on the length of the diffusion-encoding gradients being applied, the time between the leading edge of the two diffusion-encoding gradients, and the maximum gradient strength available on the imager. To use the high b values (>1500 s/mm2), with the gradients being the limiting factor, the TE has to be increased. Longer TE results in a poor signal-to-noise ratio, which can be improved by increasing the number of averages, although that also increases the overall acquisition time.

For conventional image acquisition, the use of echo-planar imaging reduced the total acquisition time considerably when compared with spin-echo imaging. Both these methods use frequency and phase-encoding gradients to generate a 2D Fourier transform image. It is well known that any physiological motion or flow that occurs during data acquisition results in artifacts that are propagated in the phase-encoding direction with the 2D Fourier transform method. Also, echo-planar imaging does not work well in regions of the body that have excessive field inhomogeneity due to susceptibility and physiological motion. These artifacts are further exacerbated when diffusion encoding is performed.

Several acquisition methods have been proposed, but they require powerful gradient hardware and faster image acquisition methods, such as echo-planar imaging. Over the years, several new approaches have been investigated to overcome the problems of diffusion imaging in the regions of the body in which physiological motion and magnetic susceptibility are prevalent. One such method uses tetrahedral diffusion encoding (tetrahedral gradients) with line scan imaging, proposed in this issue of the AJNR by Bammer et al; with this method, they were able to quantify mean diffusion values in the spinal column by using high b values and short TEs.

The tetrahedral gradient scheme uses all three orthogonal gradients at the same time. With this scheme, the direction of diffusion encoding is angled equally to all three orthogonal axes of the magnet. The tetrahedral gradient scheme uses the combined strength of the three gradients, assuming the maximum gradient strength is equal in all three axes, and it produces √ 3 (1.732) times the input of an individual orthogonal gradient. The higher gradient strength enables one to considerably shorten the TE needed to achieve a given maximum b value, resulting in improved signal-to-noise ratio and shorter acquisition time compared with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging methods. Unlike the conventional diffusion-weighted imaging method, with which four sets of images (three with and one without diffusion encoding) are acquired. With the tetrahedral method, there are four possible directions in which diffusion encoding can be applied, hence the term tetrahedral diffusion encoding (1). As a result, this method requires five sets of images (four with and one without diffusion encoding). The direction of tetrahedral gradient is altered by changing the sign of one or more diffusion-encoding gradients for a given axis. Because the tetrahedral gradient scheme enables one to get higher b values, one can measure the extracellular water diffusion by fitting the values obtained at lower b values (≤1000 s/mm2) and intracellular water diffusion by fitting the values obtained with higher b values. This is accomplished by fitting the diffusion-weighted imaging data by using a bi-exponential model.

The line scan technique overcomes the problem of physiological motion artifacts commonly seen on conventional 2D Fourier transform images, because it does not use the phase-encoding gradient to generate the image. The basic concept of the line scan spin-echo method is as follows; to obtain an axial section, a selective 90-degree RF excitation pulse is applied while the z gradient is turned on; however, when the selective 180-degree RF refocusing pulse is applied, the y gradient is turned on. This results in a row of spins that experience both RF pulses. From this row of spins, a line of data is acquired by applying a frequency-encoding gradient along the x axis. Subsequent lines of data are acquired by shifting the frequency of the 180-degree RF pulse so as to excite adjacent rows of spins. When all the lines of data are acquired, the image can be formed. There are several methods proposed to excite multiple lines of data in a given TR, but the basic concept of line scanning remains the same. This method uses spin-echo to generate the signal intensity; hence, it is not affected by the susceptibility artifacts. Because the line scan method does not use the phase-encoding gradients, the artifacts caused by physiological motion and flow are kept to a minimum.

The tetrahedral diffusion-weighted line scan method used by Bammer et al shows that this method is robust and can be used effectively for imaging of the spine. This method enabled them to use high b values (≤3005 s/mm2) while maintaining the TE of 65. It would not have been possible had they used the conventional diffusion-encoding method. They were able to quantify mean diffusion values in vertebral bodies, nuclei pulposi, and annuli fibrosi. The results showed that the diffusion-weighted signal intensity was bi-exponential in vertebral bodies and that the signal intensity followed a mono-exponential course for nuclei pulposi and annuli fibrosi. With the bi-exponential fit, they were able to quantify the values for slow (intracellular) and fast (extracellular) diffusion in the vertebral bodies. Their results indicate that the method is robust and that it provides excellent image quality.

It is certain that many new diffusion-encoding schemes along with an image acquisition method will be developed in the future, which will enable imaging parts of the body where physiological motion and magnetic field susceptibility are prevalent. The tetrahedral diffusion-weighted line scan method is showing good promise that diffusion-weighted imaging data can be obtained from these regions of the body.

References

  1. ↵
    Conturo TE, McKinstry RC, Akbudak E, Robinson BH. Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:399–412
    PubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 24 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 24, Issue 1
1 Jan 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tetrahedral Gradient Diffusion-Encoding Scheme with Line Scan Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tetrahedral Gradient Diffusion-Encoding Scheme with Line Scan Imaging
Pradip M. Pattany
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2003, 24 (1) 2-3;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tetrahedral Gradient Diffusion-Encoding Scheme with Line Scan Imaging
Pradip M. Pattany
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2003, 24 (1) 2-3;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The No Surprises Act: What Neuroradiologists Should Know
  • Call to Action: Women in Neuroradiology’s Group (WINNERS)—Is There a Need?
  • The Z-Shift: A Need for Quality Management System Level Testing and Standardization in Neuroimaging Pipelines
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire