Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
OtherINTERVENTIONAL

MR Safety and Imaging of Neuroform Stents at 3T

Arvind Nehra, Christopher J. Moran, DeWitte T. Cross and Colin P. Derdeyn
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2004, 25 (9) 1476-1478;
Arvind Nehra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J. Moran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DeWitte T. Cross III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin P. Derdeyn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: The Neuroform stent is a self-expanding nitinol stent designed for use in wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Heating and imaging artifacts were evaluated by using a porcine carotid artery aneurysm model in a 3T MR system. A suspended Neuroform stent was tested for deflection. No heating was measured, and no evidence of deflection of the stent was found. Imaging artifacts were minimal. MR imaging in patients with Neuroform stent-treated aneurysms is safe and feasible.

The Neuroform (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA) stent is a self-expanding nitinol stent designed to assist the endovascular placement of detachable coils in wide-necked intracranial aneurysms (1, 2). MR imaging is often desirable after treatment in some patients with intracranial aneurysms, both for evaluation of acute postprocedural neurologic events and as a means of surveillance for aneurysm recurrence (3, 4). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of the Neuroform stent in a high-field-strength MR system.

Methods

The methods used in this study to assess heating and deflection in the 3T MR environment are more completely described in a previously published report investigating detachable platinum coils (5). They are consistent with the methods used in other published studies (6–9).

Aneurysm Model

One section of a porcine carotid artery, approximately 3 cm in length, was obtained post mortem from an unrelated protocol performed under animal care committee approval. The artery had been used for an experimental aneurysm model. A venous pouch aneurysm had been created on the day of sacrifice and had been filled with detachable platinum coils (Matrix coils, Boston Scientific). After sacrifice of the animal, the vessel was removed en bloc and a 4 × 30 mm Neuroform stent was placed within the vessel, bridging the neck of the single coiled aneurysm. The segment was then placed in a capped 10-mL syringe filled with saline.

Assessment of Heating (Static during Motion and during Imaging)

Temperatures were recorded with two simultaneous probes in real time by using an MR compatible in situ, fiberoptic temperature sensing device (Luxtron model 755 multichanel fluoroptic thermometer, Luxtron Corp., Santa Clara, CA) sensitive to 0.1°C. The probes were placed in two different syringes: 1) within a stented artery at the level of the coil mass and 2) within a control syringe filled with saline. Heating experiments were conducted at five static points ranging from 88 cm outside the portal, to 75 cm within the bore at the imaging center. At least four temperature measurements were made for each probe at each position. Six measurements were also obtained during movement into and out of the bore at the same points, as the table was driven in and out of the magnet for a total of four complete cycles.

Temperature measurements were obtained during two imaging sequences: a turbo spin-echo (TR/TE, 3000/98 ms; flip angle, 180°; section thickness, 5 mm; acquisition, 1; field of view [FOV], 200; duration, 29 minutes) and a T1 spin-echo sequence (TR/TE, 224/9.8; flip angle, 90°; section thickness, 5 mm; acquisitions, 20; sections, 6; gap, 0; FOV, 220; duration, 21 minutes). The model and the control were placed in the center of the imaging volume and surrounded by five 200-mL saline intravenous fluid bags to achieve the specific absorption rate (SAR) limit of 3.2 W/kg for the human head. At least 20 temperature measurements were recorded for each probe during each imaging sequence.

Assessment of Attractive Forces (Static during Motion and during Imaging)

A bare 3.5 × 30 mm Neuroform stent was suspended from a thread to allow deflection in the direction of the most rapidly increasing field or highest gradient, while the angle formed from the vertical direction was measured. Attractive forces were measured at numerous static points in the X, Y, and Z planes, where X is the left-to-right horizontal direction in the bore, Y is the vertical distance from the top to the bottom of the bore, and Z is the distance from the portal outside the bore or distance from the portal into the bore and imaging volume. For measurements along the Z plane, X=0 and Y=0 and vice versa for measurements along the X plane. Measurements of deflection were taken at 1- and 10-cm increments along the X and Z planes. The Z plane was measured not only outside the bore and at the portal, but also inside the bore. Visualization of deflections in the Z direction when X and Y are 0 were monitored by using a previously created apparatus (5). The stent was observed for deflection for 30 seconds to 1 minute at each position during static measurements and imaging sequences.

Assessment of Artifacts during Imaging

A small amount of gadolinium was added to the saline solution in the syringe containing the stented porcine artery. The saline bags were used again and placed out of the phase-encoding direction. The selected imaging sequences included the following:

  1. Spin-echo T1-weighted: TR/TE, 224/9.8 ms; flip angle, 90°; acquisitions, 20; section thickness, 5.0 mm.

  2. Gradient echo: TR/TE, 100/10 ms; flip angle, 25°; acquisitions, 1; section thickness, 5.0 mm.

  3. Field Mapping Sequence: TR/TE, 300/100; flip angle, 90°; acquisitions, 1; section thickness, 5.0 mm.

Images were visually inspected for subjective evidence of distortion of length or width, as well as for changes in signal intensity within or near the coil mass.

Results

Heating

No heating was encountered at any point in the static magnetic field within or surrounding the MR system. Temperatures decreased when the model was moved from the equilibrium point at the edge of the MR suite to positions within the magnetic field along the bore of the magnet. No heating was measured in the stented artery or control syringe during the 30 minutes of continuous turbo spin-echo imaging. A mild increase of less than 0.2°C occurred in both syringes over 21 minutes of maximum radio-frequency energy deposition at the SAR limit of 3.2 W/kg (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Slight increase in temperature for stent aneurysm model and control during prolonged (21 minutes), maximal SAR (radio-frequency energy of 3.2 W/kg) imaging sequence. A similar temperature increase of less than 0.2°C can be seen in the stented artery (solid black circles) and control saline (open black circles).

Deflection

Deflection of the stent from the vertical position was not encountered at any position in the X, Y, or Z directions. In addition, no deflection was observed during movement into and out of the imager. Subjectively, no visible torque was exerted in the models while suspended from a string, at any point in the experiment. No measurable forces could be demonstrated acting on the stent, which indicates a lack of ferromagnetic or paramagnetic properties.

Imaging Artifact

The stent and coil mass within the syringe are shown in Figure 2A. The coil mass caused more susceptibility artifact than the stent (Fig 2B). Field mapping sequences failed to demonstrate any visible alterations in field homogeneity caused by the stent (Fig 2C).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Images of a stented and coiled arterial segment suspended in a saline and gadolinium solution within a 10-mL syringe. A spin-echo T1-weighted image (A) shows the syringe with stented vessel (white arrow) and adjacent coil mass (white arrowhead). The gradient echo image (B) shows signal intensity loss from susceptibility effects of the coil mass (blooming, white arrow), but no visible effects from the stent. Field mapping (C) shows no apparent field distortion related to the stent or the coil mass. The concentric lines represent magnetic field-strength lines with a difference of 50 Hz between lines.

Discussion

Nitinol is a unique metal alloy with a growing number of medical device applications. Several properties that account for its increasing use are its shape memory, biocompatibility, and kink resistance (10). Nitinol is also generally considered to be MR compatible; however, it is important to establish the safety of metallic implants in the MR environment. Some devices once previously thought to have no ferromagnetic potential have been found to possess some qualities of ferrous metals (7). Explanations for this phenomenon have included the metallurgical composition of different alloys, the degree of cold working during the manufacturing process (6), heat treatment (annealing), and other undetermined factors such as resterilization (8).

Theoretically, a current may be induced in an electrical conductor as the magnetic and radio-frequency field gradients are applied, or as the conductor moves through the static field’s fringe region outside the imager. Also, a circuit with variable resistance created by the stent and adjacent coils may lead to heating. No evidence of heating was found with movement into and out of the MR scanner. A minimal and similar increase in temperature in both stent and control syringes was found by using the maximal allowable radio-frequency energy sequence. It is possible, but unlikely, that other configurations of stent and coils not tested in the present study could create such a circuit and lead to heating. No deflection was observed.

Conclusion

We found no evidence for heating or deflection of the Neuroform stent in a comprehensive series of in vitro experiments at 3T. MR imaging at field strengths up to 3T of patients with implanted Neuroform stents is safe. Imaging artifacts are minimal.

Acknowledgments

The Neuroform stents and financial support for MR image time were provided by Boston Scientific Corporation/Target Therapeutics.

References

  1. ↵
    Broadbent LP, Moran CJ, Nehra A, et al. Transfer of a self-expanding stent to a braided microcatheter with the aid of transcatheter illumination: technical report and illustrative case. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1517–1519
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Han P, McDougall CG. Preliminary experience using the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2004;54:6–16; discussion 16–17
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Turski PA, et al. MR angiography of saccular aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:279–286
    Abstract
  4. ↵
    Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon A, Gallas S, et al. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of plain radiographs, 3d time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2003;45:818–824
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Hennemeyer CT, Wicklow K, Feinberg DA, Derdeyn CP. In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts. Radiology 2001;219:732–737
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Dujovny M, Kossovsky N, Kossowsky R, et al. Aneurysm clip motion during magnetic resonance imaging: in vivo experimental study with metallurgical factor analysis. Neurosurgery 1985;17:543–548
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Shellock FG, Morisoli S, Kanal E. MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 update. Radiology 1993;189:587–599
    PubMed
  8. ↵
    Kanal E, Shellock FG, Lewin JS. Aneurysm clip testing for ferromagnetic properties: clip variability issues. Radiology 1996;200:576–578
    PubMed
  9. ↵
    Shellock FG, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PM, et al. Aneurysm clips: evaluation of magnetic field interactions and translational attraction by use of “long-bore” and “short-bore” 3.0-T MR imaging systems. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:463–471
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Wu MH. Fabrication of nitinol materials and components. In: Shape Memory Materials and their Applications. Chu YY, Zhao LC eds. Trans Tech Publications, Inc. Zurich, Switzerland.2002;285–292
  • Received February 17, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision March 31, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 9
1 Oct 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Safety and Imaging of Neuroform Stents at 3T
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MR Safety and Imaging of Neuroform Stents at 3T
Arvind Nehra, Christopher J. Moran, DeWitte T. Cross, Colin P. Derdeyn
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2004, 25 (9) 1476-1478;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
MR Safety and Imaging of Neuroform Stents at 3T
Arvind Nehra, Christopher J. Moran, DeWitte T. Cross, Colin P. Derdeyn
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2004, 25 (9) 1476-1478;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents
  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents
  • Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The FRESH Study: Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with the New FRED X Flow Diverter with Antithrombotic Surface Treatment Technology—First Multicenter Experience in 161 Patients
  • Aneurysm Treatment with Woven EndoBridge-17: Angiographic and Clinical Results at 12 Months from a Retrospective, 2-Center Series
  • Malpractice Litigation Related to Diagnosis and Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
Show more INTERVENTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire