Effect of Cement Volume and Placement on Mechanical-Property Restoration Resulting from Vertebroplasty

References

1. ↵
   Cotten A, Deprez X, Migaud H, Chabanne B, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P. Malignant acetabular osteolyses: percutaneous injection of acrylic bone cement. Radiology 1995;197:307–310

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 2003;28:1549–1554

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA. Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 2003;114:257–265

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Liebschner MAK, Rosenberg WS, Keaveny TM. Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty. Spine 2001;26:1547–1554

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, Levine AM, Belkoff SM. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 1999;24:1772–1776

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Eriksson SAV, Isberg BO, Lindgren JU. Prediction of vertebral strength by dual photon absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:243–250

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Terjesen T, Apalset K. The influence of different degrees of stiffness of fixation plates on experimental bone healing. J Orthop Res 1988;6:293–299

   CrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, Deramond H. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: the effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine 2001;26:1537–1541

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Erbe EM, Fenton DC. Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. Spine 2000;25:1061–1064

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. Belkoff SM, Maroney M, Fenton DC, Mathis JM. An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Bone 1999;25:23S–26S

    PubMed
11. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, Deramond H. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with vertebroplasty. Spine 2001;26:1542–1546

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE. An ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1647–1651

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    Nakano M, Hirano N, Matsuura K, et al. Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with calcium phosphate cement in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression and burst fractures. J Neurosurg 2002;97:287–293

    CrossRef
14. ↵
    Jasper LE, Deramond H, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM. Material properties of various cements for use with vertebroplasty. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:1–5
15. ↵
    Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Dion JE. Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1897–1904

    Abstract
16. ↵
    Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 2000;25:923–928

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 1996;200:525–530

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Jarvik JG, Kallmes DF, Mirza SK. Vertebroplasty: learning more, but not enough. Spine 2003;28:1487–1489

    PubMed