Abstract
Summary: Our goal was to develop a system that would allow us to recreate live patient arterial pathology by using an industrial technique known as stereolithography (or rapid prototyping). In industry, drawings rendered into dicom files can be exported to a computer programmed to drive various industrial tools. Those tools then make a 3D structure shown by the original drawings. We manipulated CT scan dicom files to drive a stereolithography machine and were able to make replicas of the vascular diseases of three patients.
Rapid prototyping (RP), also known as stereolithography, has wide application in industry. The technique uses computer data generated from either a drawing or 3D object to drive a computer-controlled machine that either mills away unwanted portions of a solid (as Michelangelo removed portions of a marble block to reveal David) or deposits or builds up focal accretions, usually of plastic, thus recreating the 3D original (much as a modern sculptor would add bits of clay to an armature, eventually resulting in a completed sculpture). Unfortunately, as Webb has noted, “the use of RP technology has been slow arriving in the medical arena.” (1) Nonetheless, the technique has found use in orthopedic trauma surgery (2–4), but more commonly in maxillofacial work (4). Webb (1) and by Petzold et al (5) have written good review articles on the medical use of RP.
There has been a steady progression in quality of in vitro models during the past decade, and it is now possible to obtain models and actual replicas of many arterial diseases (6–20). The replicas have been created from a variety of sources, usually fresh cadavers. We have come to distinguish models (created from some idealized system, whether bench top or animal) from replicas (anatomically correct recreations of actual patient anatomy).
Description of the Technique
As part of their normal clinical evaluations, we examined three patients with arterial anomalies on a Lightspeed plus CT scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI). CT angiography at 1.25-mm section thickness, pitch of 1.5–1 at 140 kVp, 350 mA, during injection of 125 mL of ioversol 320 at 4 mL/s yielded basic imaging data in a dicom compatible format. This data were used to develop 3D scans on a Vitrea workstation with software version 3.1 (Fig 1).
We transferred the same data to the Center for Visualization Prototypes, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California at San Diego, where one of us (M.J.B.), by using proprietary software, rendered the sections into manufacturable volumes on a prototyping machine (model 402C; Z Corporation, Burlington, MA), which, using its proprietary software, reproduced the vessel lumen in a solid, plaster-like material. A master mold of the lumen replica was created, the plaster positive was removed from the mold, and numerous wax reproductions of the lumen replica were made in the mold (Fig 2). Several of these waxes were coated with a clear silicone elastomer (12), and the wax was then removed thermally and chemically, leaving a replica of the arterial wall (Fig 3).
Artery replicas were placed in a neck-like water bath, the water rendered isoattenuated to the silicone by the addition of ioversol (9 mg iodine/mL). With contrast agent (ioversol at 90 mg iodine/mL) within the replica lumen, we scanned the system with the same parameters as the patient. The data were then sent to the Vitrea workstation, 3D imaging was performed, and the patient image was compared with the replica image (Fig 4), measurements being made at key points.
The second patient had a complex basilar tip aneurysm and was examined with both CT angiography and conventional angiography. The third patient had an abdominal aortic aneurysm (Figs 5 and 6).
We found that making precise measurements on the workstation either from source data or from the reconstructions was difficult. For maximum reproducibility and accuracy, we enlarged the JPEG images of the reconstructions photographically to a large enough size that two observers could make nearly identical measurements of the internal carotid. We then measured the other areas of interest, assumed the internal carotid artery to be a 4-mm vessel, and calculated the comparisons.
Discussion
Visually analyzing the images obtained from the first patient and her replica shows the degree of detail and relationships possible at present. Measurements taken from six regions—the internal carotid artery seven vessel diameters beyond the plaque where arterial walls were parallel, similar to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria; the bulb dilatation; through the maximal narrowing; the proximal external carotid artery stenosis; the large posterior ulcer, in its craniocaudal dimension; and the common carotid artery—are shown in Table 1. Measurements, except for the ulcer were taken perpendicular to the long axis of the vessel at the point of measurement.
Figures 5 and 6, images from the third patient with abdominal aortic aneurysm, provide another opportunity to judge the quality of reproduction.
With currently available CT technology, reproductions of live patient pathologic vessels have been created. At present, the time taken for the creation, as well as the energy required, precludes our technique from having immediate clinical use—the rapid in the term rapid prototyping uses an industrial rather than a medical timescale. But, to recall our history, early CT scans and early MR images were similarly time- and energy-intensive.
Our quest for good simulators began with physiologically inaccurate glass models, progressing through surgically created pathology in live animals, next to more physiologically accurate and lifelike models created from fresh cadavers. This newest step—no longer needing cadaver source material but able to study the live patient has required, first, access to the advanced imaging capability now routinely found in most departments with the CT scanner and its angiography algorithm and, second, the combination of locally developed and proprietary computer algorithms to drive the stereolithography machine. With this capability, we have been able to reproduce even complex vascular pathology.
The major limitation of our technique appears to be the molding process. Molding complex vascular structures requires an experienced mold maker who is willing to spend time in opening the mold in such way as to allow unskilled labor to make the subsequent waxes. The basic principles of this technique have been described by Liepsch (21) and by Kerber et al (12). This lost-wax technique allows for an almost unlimited number of reproductions to be made, making available to the interventionalist multiple replicas on which to practice.
Conclusion
Creating accurate replicas of arterial pathology in the live patient is feasible, although presently time-consuming and energy-intensive. The replicas created allow physiologically accurate, flow dynamic study of the altered anatomy. In addition, being able to hold a wax replica of the pathology in one’s hands, rotating it in any direction desired, allows both surgeons and interventionists to develop a haptic intuition about the best surgical approach, what can be expected when a particular pathology is viewed through the operating microscope or fluoroscope, and what problems to expect. As Petzold et al note, the 3D model “gives the surgeon at realistic impression of complex structures . . . the shift from the visual to the visual-tactical representation . . . introduces a new kind of interaction called ‘touch to comprehend” (5).
We expect that, as the techniques are refined and simplified, the availability of arterial replicas will become commonplace, being especially valuable to interventionalists, teachers, and researchers.
References
- Received May 17, 2004.
- Accepted after revision January 28, 2005.
- Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology