Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Monitoring for Neurointerventional Procedures Using a Point-of-Care Platelet Function Test: A Single-Center Experience

D.H. Lee, A. Arat, H. Morsi, H. Shaltoni, J.R. Harris and M.E. Mawad
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2008, 29 (7) 1389-1394; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1070
D.H. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Arat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Morsi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Shaltoni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.R. Harris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.E. Mawad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Suh DC, Kim SJ, Lee DH, et al. Outcome of endovascular treatment in symptomatic intracranial vascular stenosis. Korean J Radiol 2005;6:1–7
    PubMed
  2. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Woo H, et al. Neuroform in-stent stenosis: incidence, natural history, and treatment strategies. Neurosurgery 2006;59:34–42
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. SSYLVIA Study Investigators. Stenting of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Vertebral or Intracranial Arteries (SSYLVIA): study results. Stroke 2004;35:1388–92. Epub 2004 Apr 22.
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Ries T, Buhk JH, Kucinski T, et al. Intravenous administration of acetylsalicylic acid during endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms reduces the rate of thromboembolic events. Stroke 2006;37:1816–21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Grunwald IQ, Papanagiotou P, Politi M, et al. Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: occurrence of thromboembolic events. Neurosurgery 2006;58:612–18
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Bertrand ME, Legrand V, Boland J, et al. Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting: the full anticoagulation versus aspirin and ticlopidine (fantastic) study. Circulation 1998;98:1597–603
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Cadroy Y, Bossavy JP, Thalamas C, et al. Early potent antithrombotic effect with combined aspirin and a loading dose of clopidogrel on experimental arterial thrombogenesis in humans. Circulation 2000;101:2823–28
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Yan BP, Clark DJ, Ajani AE. Oral antiplatelet therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2005;6:3–12
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Cutlip DE. Stent thrombosis: historical perspectives and current trends. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2000;10:89–101
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: consideration and management. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19:439–48
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, et al. Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:246–51
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Siller-Matula J, Schror K, Wojta J, et al. Thienopyridines in cardiovascular disease: focus on clopidogrel resistance. Thromb Haemost 2007;97:385–93
    PubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    von Beckerath N, Pogatsa-Murray G, Wieczorek A, et al. Correlation of a new point-of-care test with conventional optical aggregometry for the assessment of clopidogrel responsiveness. Thromb Haemost 2006;95:910–11
    PubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    van Werkum JW, van der Stelt CA, Seesing TH, et al. A head-to-head comparison between the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and light transmittance aggregometry for monitoring the individual platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:2516–18. Epub 2006 Aug 28
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Malinin A, Pokov A, Spergling M, et al. Monitoring platelet inhibition after clopidogrel with the VerifyNow-P2Y12(R) rapid analyzer: the VERIfy Thrombosis risk ASsessment (VERITAS) study. Thromb Res 2007;119:277–84. Epub 2006 Mar 24
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. Coleman JL, Wang JC, Simon DI. Determination of individual response to aspirin therapy using the accumetrics Ultegra RPFA-ASA system. Point of Care 2004;3:77–82
  17. Malinin A, Spergling M, Muhlestein B, et al. Assessing aspirin responsiveness in subjects with multiple risk factors for vascular disease with a rapid platelet function analyzer. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2004;15:295–301
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, et al. Identification of low responders to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting. Thromb Res 2005;115:101–08
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Patrono C, Coller B, FitzGerald GA, et al. Platelet-active drugs: the relationships among dose, effectiveness, and side effects—the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126 (suppl 3):234S–64S
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Clopidogrel resistance? Thromb Res 2006;120:311–21
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet 2001;358:527–33
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:2411–20
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345:494–502
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hayes KM, et al. The relation of dosing to clopidogrel responsiveness and the incidence of high post-treatment platelet aggregation in patients undergoing coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1392–96
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Wiviott SD. Clopidogrel response variability, resistance, or both? Am J Cardiol 2006;98:18N–24N
    PubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    von Beckerath N, Kastrati A, Wieczorek A, et al. A double-blind, randomized study on platelet aggregation in patients treated with a daily dose of 150 or 75 mg of clopidogrel for 30 days. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1814–19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001–15. Epub 2007 Nov 4
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006;113:e166–286
    FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Feher G, Koltai K, Alkonyi B, et al. Clopidogrel resistance: role of body mass and concomitant medications. Int J Cardiol 2006;120:188–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, et al. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation 2003;107:2908–13
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D, et al. Time dependence of platelet inhibition after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in a large, unselected cohort of candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2005;111:2560–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 7
August 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Monitoring for Neurointerventional Procedures Using a Point-of-Care Platelet Function Test: A Single-Center Experience
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Monitoring for Neurointerventional Procedures Using a Point-of-Care Platelet Function Test: A Single-Center Experience
D.H. Lee, A. Arat, H. Morsi, H. Shaltoni, J.R. Harris, M.E. Mawad
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2008, 29 (7) 1389-1394; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1070

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Monitoring for Neurointerventional Procedures Using a Point-of-Care Platelet Function Test: A Single-Center Experience
D.H. Lee, A. Arat, H. Morsi, H. Shaltoni, J.R. Harris, M.E. Mawad
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2008, 29 (7) 1389-1394; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1070
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clopidogrel Resistance in Neurovascular Stenting: Correlations between Light Transmission Aggregometry, VerifyNow, and the Multiplate
  • Tailoring platelet inhibition according to multiple electrode aggregometry decreases the rate of thrombotic complications after intracranial flow-diverting stent implantation
  • Extra-Aneurysmal Flow Modification Following Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation: Focus on Regional Branches, Perforators, and the Parent Vessel
  • Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline Embolization Device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value
  • Variability in initial response to standard clopidogrel therapy, delayed conversion to clopidogrel hyper-response, and associated thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms
  • Platelet function inhibitors and platelet function testing in neurointerventional procedures
  • Thromboembolic Complications in Patients with Clopidogrel Resistance after Coil Embolization for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Carotid artery stenting outcomes: do they correlate with antiplatelet response assays?
  • Last-Recorded P2Y12 Reaction Units Value Is Strongly Associated with Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Complications Occurring Up to 6 Months after Treatment in Patients with Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device
  • Incidence of Microemboli and Correlation with Platelet Inhibition in Aneurysmal Flow Diversion
  • Point of care platelet function testing in routine neurointerventional care is unjustified
  • Safety and Efficacy of Neuroform for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective, Consecutive, French Multicentric Study
  • Assessment of Platelet Inhibition by Point-of-Care Testing in Neuroendovascular Procedures
  • Clopidogrel Hyper-Response and Bleeding Risk in Neurointerventional Procedures
  • Clopidogrel Resistance Is Associated with Thromboembolic Complications in Patients Undergoing Neurovascular Stenting
  • Pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction units value predicts perioperative thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device
  • Body weight: a risk factor for subtherapeutic antithrombotic therapy in neurovascular stenting
  • Neuroform Stent-Assisted Coiling of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Short- and Midterm Results from a Single-Center Experience with 68 Patients
  • Preinterventional Clopidogrel Response Variability for Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Clinical Implications
  • Carotid artery stenting: sweat the small stuff
  • Incidence and time course of carotid in-stent restenosis in a consecutive series of 295 patients
  • The learning curve for neuroendovascular procedures: How important is it?
  • Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The FRESH Study: Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with the New FRED X Flow Diverter with Antithrombotic Surface Treatment Technology—First Multicenter Experience in 161 Patients
  • Aneurysm Treatment with Woven EndoBridge-17: Angiographic and Clinical Results at 12 Months from a Retrospective, 2-Center Series
  • Malpractice Litigation Related to Diagnosis and Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire