Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

CT Angiography for Brain Death Diagnosis

E. Frampas, M. Videcoq, E. de Kerviler, F. Ricolfi, V. Kuoch, F. Mourey, A. Tenaillon and B. Dupas
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2009, 30 (8) 1566-1570; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1614
E. Frampas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Videcoq
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. de Kerviler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Ricolfi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Kuoch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Mourey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Tenaillon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Dupas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lack of cerebral circulation is an important confirmatory test for brain death (BD). Conventional angiography remains the standard imaging method, but CT angiography (CTA) is emerging as an alternative. France accepts BD diagnoses relying on a score based on lack of opacification of 7 intracerebral vessels in CTA images. The purpose of this study was to validate the efficiency of this score and to evaluate the sensitivity of a novel 4-point CTA score in confirming BD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective multicentric study was conducted during 12 months with 105 patients referred for CTA to confirm a clinical diagnosis of BD. Clinical data were recorded. CTA images were interpreted first by local radiologists at the referent center, resulting in a 7-point score based on lack of opacification of the pericallosal and cortical segments of the middle cerebral arteries (MCAs), internal cerebral veins (ICVs), and 1 great cerebral vein per patient and, second, by a consensus panel of 3 expert radiologists, blinded to the initial scores, resulting in novel 4-point scores based on the lack of opacification of the cortical segments of the MCAs and ICVs.

RESULTS: Injection of contrast medium did not alter renal function. With the initial 7-point score, sensitivity was 62.8%. With the simplified 4-point score, sensitivity was 85.7% and specificity was 100%. Opacification of ICVs was absent in 98.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Lack of opacification in the cortical segments of the MCAs and internal veins in CTA is efficient and reliable for confirming BD.

The clinical criteria of brain death (BD), deep coma and absence of brain stem reflexes, may be difficult to evaluate in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) in the presence of central nervous system (CNS) depressants.1 Many countries require a clinical diagnosis of BD to be confirmed by a demonstration of lack of brain cerebral function or circulation. The methods accepted for such demonstrations include electroencephalography (EEG), transcranial Doppler (TCD), and conventional angiography. Legal requirements vary by country. For example, France requires 2 rounds of EEG with an interval of 4 hours or conventional angiography.2–4 Although conventional angiography remains the reference standard method for demonstrating lack of cerebral circulation, CT angiography (CTA) is emerging as a viable alternative. CTA confers a number of advantages: lower invasiveness, wider availability, lower operator dependence, greater rapidity, and ability to evaluate patients in the presence of CNS depressants. The efficiency of CTA for BD diagnosis was first demonstrated in a study by Dupas et al,5 in which BD diagnosis relied on a score based on lack of opacification of 7 intracerebral vessels: the pericallosal arteries, cortical segments of the (MCA) arteries, internal cerebral veins (ICVs), and 1 great cerebral vein (GCV) per patient. On the basis of that study, France accepted the 7-point CTA score for BD diagnosis in 1998. Other studies have since demonstrated the persistence of visualization of intracerebral vessels in BD. Dupas et al studied a population of 14 BD patients and 11 healthy controls, but larger studies are needed to validate their findings further. This study aimed to validate the sensitivity of a simplified 4-point CTA score based on lack of opacification of the cortical segments of the MCAs and the ICVs in confirming the clinical diagnosis of BD.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

We prospectively evaluated 105 patients diagnosed with clinical BD at 6 centers from January to December 2005. All patients in the ICU with clinical BD were considered eligible. For 12 months, the ICU referred 105 BD patients for confirmatory CTA (47 women, 58 men; mean age, 49.2 years; age range, 16–76 years). Initial causes of coma were head trauma (n = 36); cerebral hemorrhage (n = 45), with 48% from aneurysm rupture; cerebral stroke (n = 4); anoxia (n = 11); and cerebral hypertension (n = 9).

All clinical criteria for BD were present in all 105 patients before CTA, including a positive apnea test (duration, 10–15 minutes; 15-minute preoxygenation with 100% oxygen; oxygenation catheter at the trachea level at a rate of 6 L/min; a partial pressure of carbon dioxide value of 60 mm Hg or higher confirmed apnea).

Data Collection

Demographic data, initial causes, and the following were recorded for all patients: the time between initial coma and clinical BD diagnosis; the use of vasoactive agents and resuscitation fluids, arterial pressure, renal function before and after CTA, and organ harvest.

CTA

Multidetector CT scans were acquired following the protocol outlined by Dupas et al.5 After a lateral topography, 3 similar acquisitions were planned starting at the C1-C2 level to the convexity. The first phase was without injection of contrast. A nonionic contrast medium(120 mL; concentration >300 mg/mL) was injected through an antecubital vein at a rate of 3 mL/s by using a power injector and an 18-gauge catheter. The second and third scans were then acquired, starting 20 and 60 seconds after the contrast medium injection commenced. The same geometric parameters were used to allow further subtractions. Images were acquired with a section thickness of 1 mm (pitch, 0.5–1); scanning parameters were 120 kV, 300 mAs, 200-mm FOV, and 512 × 512 matrix. Contiguous axial images (5 mm) were then reconstructed. Subtractions of the precontrast and postcontrast series and sagittal reformations were performed as needed.

Vessel Opacification and CTA Scores

CTA images were first interpreted by local radiologists at the 6 referent centers, to confirm clinical BD; then all examinations were reviewed by 3 expert radiologists blinded to the results of the first interpretation to assess lack of opacification and resolve discrepant initial interpretations. Opacification of superficial temporal arteries was assessed on the second phase at 20 seconds to confirm the correct injection of contrast medium. The third phase, at 60 seconds, was used to evaluate opacification of the following vessels: pericallosal arteries, cortical segments of the MCAs, right and left ICVs, and GCV (Fig 1). Following Dupas et al,5 a point was given for each vessel without opacification, resulting in “lack of opacification” scores of between 0 and 7. Opacification of the basilar artery (BA) was also recorded for all patients. The same dataset was then used to construct a novel 4-point CTA score based on the lack of opacification of cortical segments of the MCAs and the 2 ICVs.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

CTA: normal aspect in a healthy adult. A, All intracranial vessels, pericallosal arteries, MCAs, ICVs (arrows), straight sinus, and superior sagittal sinus, are opacified. B, Cortical arteries are opacified (arrows). In both, superficial temporal arteries are visible.

Confirming CTA Score BD Diagnosis

The 7-point CTA scores were used for diagnosing BD, scores of 7 indicating BD (Fig 2). Patients with scores <7 were given a complementary examination to assess BD: delayed CTA (n = 10 patients), conventional angiography (n = 10), or 2 EEGs (n = 12). Data were missing for 7 patients.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

CTA in BD before and 60 seconds after contrast medium injection. A and B, Unenhanced CT sections. C and D, Corresponding CT sections with identical window settings 60 seconds after contrast medium injection, demonstrating cerebral CT silence: absence of visualization of ICVs and cortical segments of the MCAs. Both superficial temporal arteries are opacified, indicating that contrast medium has been correctly injected (arrows).

Results

Clinical Data

The mean interval between the initial coma and absence of brain stem reflexes and apnea test was 67 hours and 87 hours, respectively. During their ICU stay, 96.2% of patients were administered vasopressive agents (adrenalin for 93.3%). At the time of CTA, the mean minimal systolic arterial pressure was 114 ± 29.19 mm Hg, 92.4% of patients had been treated with catecholamine, and 42.8% had undergone fluid resuscitation. The respective mean creatinemia before and after CTA was 101.1 and 89 μmol/L; and the respective mean uremia was 6.6 and 5.79 μmol/L, indicating that the injection of contrast medium did not alter renal function. Confirmed BD led to organ harvesting in 75 patients.

Vessel Opacification and CTA Scores

Residual vessel opacification was determined by visual analysis, by using a comparison between unenhanced and enhanced CT scans. The superficial temporal arteries were opacified at 20 seconds in all patients, confirming proper injection of the contrast medium; and they were still visualized at 60 seconds.

Seven-Point CTA Scores.

Sixty-six patients had CTA scores of 7 (sensitivity 62.8%) with a lack of opacification of pericallosal arteries, cortical segments of the MCAs, ICVs, and GCV; 16.2% (n = 17) of patients had scores of 6 mainly due to persistent pericallosal artery visualization. Lower scores of 5 (n = 7), 4 (n = 8), 3 (n = 5), 2 (n = 1), and 1 (n = 1) were also recorded, mainly due to, first, the pericallosal arteries and, second, the cortical segments of the MCAs. ICV opacification was absent in 103 (98.1%) patients. For the 2 patients with 1 residual opacified ICV, the score was ≤2. For 1 patient, the only opacified vessels were the GCV and the BA (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Impact of residual opacified vessels on initial 7-point CTA score for patients with scores <7 (N=39)

Four-Point CTA Scores.

Eighty-five and seven tenths percent of patients had a score of four; 7.6% had scores of three; 4.8% had scores of 2, and 1.9% had a score of 1 (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

New simplified 4-point CTA score for BD (N = 105 patients)

CTA Score Confirming BD Diagnosis

The complementary examinations to confirm BD diagnoses based on the 7-point CTA score were as follows: The mean interval for the second CTA was 99 ± 68 hours; the second CTA score was 7 for 8 of the 10 patients and 6 and 4 for the other 2. In all cases, conventional angiography and EEGs confirmed brain death. Data were missing for 7 patients.

Discussion

The novel 4-point CTA score based on the lack of opacification of 4, instead of 7, cerebral vessels appears more sensitive in confirming BD than the accepted 7-point CTA score. A demonstration of lack of cerebral circulation may be required for BD confirmation. Ideally, the technique for such a demonstration would be noninvasive, easily accessible, operator-independent, highly specific, and highly sensitive. Conventional angiography is highly sensitive, but it is invasive and time-consuming and requires an experienced neuroradiologist, leading to delayed examinations.6 CTA is emerging as a viable alternative and was accepted by the French Agency of Biomedicine for BD confirmation in 1998 after its utility was demonstrated by Dupas et al7 in a study of 25 subjects (14 BD patients and 11 controls). Dupas et al developed a 7-point CTA score based on lack of opacification of 7 cerebral vessels, with scores of 7 indicating BD. However, larger prospective studies were needed to validate CTA for BD diagnoses, and only a few reports are available in the literature.7–9

Since this first study, follow-up studies by others investigated the efficacy of the 7-point CTA score and demonstrated residual arterial opacification on CTA in clinically BD patients, particularly for the pericallosal and horizontal portions of the MCAs. This phenomenon is called “stasis filling” and necessitates repetitive CTAs, increasing the waiting period between clinical brain death and radiologic confirmation to >71 hours.10

A study of 43 patients by Combes et al11 found that the 7-point score had a sensitivity of 69.7% compared with conventional angiography; 76.9% of divergent cases were due to opacification of the anterior cerebral arteries (in 38.5% of the patients, they were the only opacified vessels). There was no opacification of BAs. With the novel 4-point CTA score, which does not include those vessels, the sensitivity would have been 81.4%.

In the present study, 37.1% of patients had opacified residual vessels. A single persistent pericallosal artery opacification was present in 16 of the 17 patients with a CTA score of 6; both arteries were opacified in all 7 patients with a score of 5. With the new 4-point CTA score, sensitivity was 85.7%, obviating new examinations. Nine of 11 patients who had a second CTA (mean interval, 99 hours) had a score of 7. Pericallosal arteries were still opacified for 2 patients. One had an opacified cortical artery, but no venous return was noted. Leclerc et al12 found similar results; and on the basis of their data, the sensitivity of the 4-point CTA score would have been 93.3%. Together with the present findings, this suggests that the absence of ICVs and bilateral cortical branches of the MCAs constitutes the best criterion of BD diagnosis by using CTA. The absence of the ICV also appears to be the most sensitive and earliest sign. Both internal veins were absent in 98.1% of the patients. Quesnel et al13 found similar results; 85.7% of their patients lacked deep venous return.

In the present study, 2 patients had 1 residual opacified ICV, but the score was low (≤2). One patient had opacification of only the GCV, leading to a score of 6, but the BA was opacified at 20 and 60 seconds. This was previously described by Braun et al14 in intravenous angiography with residual flow in the vertebrobasilar system, despite clinical BD. These findings suggest that it was judicial to exclude the GCV for the 4-point score.

The novel 4-point CTA score appears more sensitive (85.7%) and requires analysis of only 4 vessels. Whereas the cortical segments of the MCAs were assessable in all previous studies,11,12 the excluded cerebral veins were deemed difficult to assess because of cerebral hemorrhage or edema. Strict comparison of unenhanced and enhanced images, additional sagittal and axial subtractions, is helpful for confirming lack of opacification. CTA remains a 100% specific method as shown by the 10 conventional angiographies and 12 EEGs performed when the CTA score was <7.

An increase in intracranial pressure (ICP), leading to cerebral circulation arrest, is a major consideration. CTA, given its high sensitivity for vessel visualization, does not appear to be efficient for patients with craniotomy, as previously reported, with intravenous angiography leading to false-negative results.14 To avoid repetitive examinations, we recommend an interval of >6 hours before CTA, particularly in cases of anoxia, because of progressive increase of ICP. In the present study, data on the interval between clinical BD diagnosis and the first CTA were missing due to logistic problems, so we could not evaluate the potential statistical difference between the score and interval.

Many countries require clinical diagnoses of BD to be confirmed by a demonstration of lack of brain cerebral function or circulation. The methods accepted for such demonstration include EEG, TCD, and radionuclide brain perfusion, but conventional angiography remains the reference standard. EEG cannot be performed or may be difficult to interpret in patients with hypothermia, severe metabolic disorders, drug intoxication, or hemodynamic instability; conventional angiography is needed.15 TCD, a noninvasive bedside method to test cerebral circulation arrest, is not influenced by sedative agents. A meta-analysis by Monteiro et al16 found a TCD sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 99%; and Poularas et al17 found 100% concurrence between TCD and angiography. Persistent intracranial diastolic flow may be present in patients with a BD diagnosis based on the clinical or EEG or conventional angiography criteria.18

Its high sensitivity notwithstanding, TCD is operator-dependent, and 5%–10% of patients cannot be examined because of the absence of bone window or initial flow19,20; moreover, posterior circulation can be difficult to analyze. TCD could be useful to determine the most appropriate interval for CTA, to avoid repetitive examinations. Other efficient methods, such as radionuclide brain perfusion, can shorten time to BD confirmation and improve organ harvest rates. However, they remain costly, and sensitivity was 62% in a study of 58 patients by Newberg et al.21

Ancillary confirmatory testing practices vary worldwide. In the United States, for example, EEG is performed in 84% of main neurologic hospitals; conventional angiography, in 74%; and CTA, in only 6%.22 The main advantages of CTA are that it is a highly sensitive imaging examination with an operator-independent standard protocol, has a simplified score, and has greater accessibility. Moreover, CT is not limited to brain: The whole body can be examined simultaneously. Indeed, chest, abdominal, and pelvic examinations are now routinely integrated in our CT protocol for assessing BD. This additional information provides further insights into organ vasculature and abnormalities before harvesting.

Conclusions

The novel 4-point CTA score based on nonopacification of the cortical segments of the MCAs and the ICVs appears highly sensitive for confirming brain death, maintaining a specificity of 100%. Absence of opacification of ICVs is the most sensitive sign. Compared with other ancillary tests for BD, CTA is reliable, standardized, and widely accessible and can examine the whole body, making it particularly useful in cases in which there is a potential for organ harvesting.

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the CTA Group for BD: Drs E. Bironneau, F. Buzy, J.-C. Combes, J. Duranteau, Y. Menu, D. Perrin-Gachadoat, and C. Quintin; all members of the organ harvesting teams; and Kudzaishe Takavarasha for his help in English.

Footnotes

  • This study was approved and supported by the Agence Française de Biomédecine (French Agency of Biomedicine).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Barber J,
    2. Becker D,
    3. Behrman R,
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for the determination of death. JAMA 1981; 246: 2184– 86
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Wijdicks EFM
    . The diagnosis of brain death. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1215– 21
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Wijdicks EFM
    . Brain death worldwide: accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58: 20– 25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Decree No. 96–1401 of December 2, 1996 concerning brain death diagnosis, organ, tissue, and cell harvesting for therapeutic or scientific uses and Circular D.G.S No. 96–733 of December 4, 1996. Official Journal of the French Republic; 1996.
  5. ↵
    1. Dupas B,
    2. Gayet-Delacroix M,
    3. Villers D,
    4. et al
    . Diagnosis of brain death using two-phase spiral CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 641– 47
    Abstract
  6. ↵
    1. Bradac GB,
    2. Simon RS
    . Angiography in brain death. Neuroradiology 1974; 7: 25
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Boulard G,
    2. Guiot P,
    3. Pottecher T,
    4. et al
    1. Dupas B,
    2. Gayet-Delacroix M,
    3. Bironneau E,
    4. et al
    . Angiography and Brain Death Diagnosis. In: Boulard G, Guiot P, Pottecher T, et al. Management of Patients in Brain Death in Perspective of Organ and Tissue Harvesting. Paris: Elsevier: 2003: 95– 102
  8. ↵
    1. Qureshi AI,
    2. Kirmani JF,
    3. Xavier AR,
    4. et al
    . Computed tomographic angiography for diagnosis of brain death. Neurology 2004; 62: 652– 53
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Yu S-L,
    2. Lo Y-K,
    3. Lin S-L,
    4. et al
    . Computed tomographic angiography for determination of brain death. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 528– 31
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Brocas E,
    2. Thierry S,
    3. Le Roy C,
    4. et al
    . Interval between clinical and CT-angiographic diagnosis of brain death: about 10 cases. In: Proceedings of the 46th National Congress of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Paris, France. Paris, France: Editions Scientifiques et Médicales Elsevier SAS et SFAR; 2004: R239
  11. ↵
    1. Combes J-C,
    2. Chomel A,
    3. Ricolfi F,
    4. et al
    . Reliability of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of brain death. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 16– 20
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Leclerc X,
    2. Taschner CA,
    3. Vidal A,
    4. et al
    . The role of spiral CT for the assessment of the intracranial circulation in suspected brain-death. J Neuroradiol 2006; 33: 90– 95
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Quesnel C,
    2. Fulgencio J-P,
    3. Adrie C,
    4. et al
    . Limitations of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of brain death. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 2129– 35
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Braun M,
    2. Ducrocq X,
    3. Huot JC,
    4. et al
    . Intravenous angiography in brain death: report of 140 patients. Neuroradiology 1997; 39: 400– 05
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 3: minimum technical standards for EEG recording in suspected cerebral death. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 23: 97– 104
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Monteiro LM,
    2. Bollen CW,
    3. van Huffelen AC,
    4. et al
    . Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography to confirm brain death: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32: 1937– 44
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Poularas J,
    2. Karakitsos D,
    3. Kostakis A,
    4. et al
    . Comparison between transcranial color Doppler ultrasonography and angiography in the confirmation of brain death. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 1213– 17
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Cabrer C,
    2. Dominguez-Roldan JM,
    3. Manyalich M,
    4. et al
    . Persistence of intracranial diastolic flow in transcranial Doppler sonography exploration of patients in brain death. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 1642– 43
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ducrocq X,
    2. Braun M,
    3. Debouverie M,
    4. et al
    . Brain death and transcranial Doppler: experience in 130 cases of brain dead patients. J Neurol Sci 1998; 160: 41– 46
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. de Freitas GR,
    2. Andre C
    . Sensitivity of transcranial Doppler for confirming brain death: a prospective study of 270 cases. Acta Neurol Scand 2006; 113: 426– 32
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Newberg A,
    2. Alavi A,
    3. van Rhijn S,
    4. et al
    . Radiologic diagnosis of brain death. JAMA 2002; 288: 2121– 22
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Greer DM,
    2. Varelas PN,
    3. Haque S,
    4. et al
    . Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions. Neurology 2008; 70: 284– 89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received January 20, 2009.
  • Accepted after revision March 9, 2009.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 8
1 Sep 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CT Angiography for Brain Death Diagnosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
E. Frampas, M. Videcoq, E. de Kerviler, F. Ricolfi, V. Kuoch, F. Mourey, A. Tenaillon, B. Dupas
CT Angiography for Brain Death Diagnosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2009, 30 (8) 1566-1570; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1614

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
CT Angiography for Brain Death Diagnosis
E. Frampas, M. Videcoq, E. de Kerviler, F. Ricolfi, V. Kuoch, F. Mourey, A. Tenaillon, B. Dupas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2009, 30 (8) 1566-1570; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1614
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of Skull Defects on the Role of CTA for Brain Death Confirmation
  • An elusive brain death diagnosis: You can't get there from here
  • An elusive brain death diagnosis: You can't get there from here
  • Brain Death: Assessment, Controversy, and Confounding Factors
  • CT Perfusion for Confirmation of Brain Death
  • Brain dead or not? CT angiogram yielding false-negative result on brain death confirmation
  • Solid Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
  • Crossref (122)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults
    Eelco F.M. Wijdicks, Panayiotis N. Varelas, Gary S. Gronseth, David M. Greer
    Neurology 2010 74 23
  • Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria
    David M. Greer, Sam D. Shemie, Ariane Lewis, Sylvia Torrance, Panayiotis Varelas, Fernando D. Goldenberg, James L. Bernat, Michael Souter, Mehmet Akif Topcuoglu, Anne W. Alexandrov, Marie Baldisseri, Thomas Bleck, Giuseppe Citerio, Rosanne Dawson, Arnold Hoppe, Stephen Jacobe, Alex Manara, Thomas A. Nakagawa, Thaddeus Mason Pope, William Silvester, David Thomson, Hussain Al Rahma, Rafael Badenes, Andrew J. Baker, Vladimir Cerny, Cherylee Chang, Tiffany R. Chang, Elena Gnedovskaya, Moon-Ku Han, Stephen Honeybul, Edgar Jimenez, Yasuhiro Kuroda, Gang Liu, Uzzwal Kumar Mallick, Victoria Marquevich, Jorge Mejia-Mantilla, Michael Piradov, Sarah Quayyum, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Ying-ying Su, Shelly D. Timmons, Jeanne Teitelbaum, Walter Videtta, Kapil Zirpe, Gene Sung
    JAMA 2020 324 11
  • Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI as a means to measure in vivo perfusion: A review of the evidence
    Christian Federau
    NMR in Biomedicine 2017 30 11
  • CT Perfusion for Confirmation of Brain Death
    J.J.S. Shankar, R. Vandorpe
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2013 34 6
  • Computed Tomography Angiography in the Diagnosis Of Brain Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Andreas H. Kramer, Derek J. Roberts
    Neurocritical Care 2014 21 3
  • Brain Death
    Mack Drake, Andrew Bernard, Eugene Hessel
    Surgical Clinics of North America 2017 97 6
  • Detection of intracranial circulatory arrest in brain death using cranial CT‐angiography
    S. Welschehold, T. Kerz, S. Boor, K. Reuland, F. Thömke, A. Reuland, C. Beyer, W. Wagner, W. Müller‐Forell, A. Giese
    European Journal of Neurology 2013 20 1
  • Computed Tomographic Angiography and Perfusion in the Diagnosis of Brain Death
    R. Bohatyrewicz, M. Sawicki, A. Walecka, J. Walecki, O. Rowinski, A. Bohatyrewicz, Z. Czajkowski, A. Krzysztalowski, J. Solek-Pastuszka, M. Zukowski, E. Marzec-Lewenstein, M. Wojtaszek
    Transplantation Proceedings 2010 42 10
  • The Role of Neuroimaging in the Determination of Brain Death
    Derek MacDonald, Brandie Stewart‐Perrin, Jai Jai Shiva Shankar
    Journal of Neuroimaging 2018 28 4
  • Computed tomographic angiography criteria in the diagnosis of brain death—comparison of sensitivity and interobserver reliability of different evaluation scales
    Marcin Sawicki, R. Bohatyrewicz, K. Safranow, A. Walecka, J. Walecki, O. Rowinski, J. Solek-Pastuszka, Z. Czajkowski, M. Guzinski, M. Burzynska, J. Wojczal
    Neuroradiology 2014 56 8

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire