Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

Diffuse White Matter Damage Is Absent in Neuromyelitis Optica

F. Aboul-Enein, M. Krššák, R. Höftberger, D. Prayer and W. Kristoferitsch
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2010, 31 (1) 76-79; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1791
F. Aboul-Enein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Krššák
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Höftberger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Prayer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Kristoferitsch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an idiopathic mostly relapsing inflammatory disease with attacks on the optic nerves and spinal cord. Whether NMO is a separate disease or a subtype of classic multiple sclerosis (MS) is unclear. Clinically, CSF and MR imaging parameters and histopathologic data suggest that the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) may be affected in MS but not in patients with NMO. Therefore, we hypothesized that the NAWM in NMO is normal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied prospectively 8 patients with clinically definitive NMO or remitting longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) and 8 healthy controls. Ratios of N-acetylaspartate to creatine (Cr) and choline to Cr and the absolute concentrations of the metabolites were measured by chemical shift imaging with a 1H-MR spectroscopy operating at 3T. All patients with clinically definitive NMO and LETM were found to be positive for NMO−immunoglobin G with a commercially available test.

RESULTS: The metabolic pattern of the NAWM of patients with NMO showed no difference compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse white matter damage is absent in NMO.

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a relapsing inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) of unknown origin.1 NMO is characterized by severe attacks on the optic nerves and spinal cord.1 Other areas of the CNS are usually not or, if ever, much less affected.1 Whether NMO is a subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) or a separate disease is still debated.1–3 However, NMO can be distinguished from classic relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) by clinical, laboratory, pathologic, and MR imaging findings and by therapy response.1,4–9 In contrast to RRMS, the optic nerves and spinal cord seem to be the main predilection sites of inflammatory attacks in NMO.4,6 Spinal cord lesions are usually large, extending over ≥3 vertebral segments.4 Typical RRMS brain lesions are usually absent in patients with NMO.4

Only a few patients with NMO develop typical MS brain lesions in long-term follow-up,1 and in contrast to MS, NMO only very seldom follows a secondary-progressive course.10 Moreover, in MS subtle diffuse axonal damage with reduced N-acetylaspartate (NAA) levels may be found in the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) in very early disease stages.11,12 1H-MR spectroscopy is sensitive to metabolic alterations and allows an in vivo assessment of subtle metabolic changes within the NAWM.12–14

Signals of NAA, creatine (Cr), and choline (Cho) can be well quantified with 1H-MR spectroscopy. NAA is almost exclusively found in the active mitochondria of neurons and axons and thus is a marker of axonal function and integrity.15 Reduced levels of NAA indicate axonal degeneration or axonal loss in white matter lesions or neuronal damage distant from the areas of investigation.16 Thus, discrete metabolic changes within the NAWM, which may be caused by silent ongoing inflammation, may be detected by 1H-MR spectroscopy.13,14

The quantification of the metabolite concentration is usually based on the metabolite signal-intensity ratio to Cr. However, the concentration of Cr may vary in various pathologic conditions.17 This problem can be solved by the acquisition of water signal intensity from the respective region and by using this as an internal concentration reference.17 Furthermore, the improvements in the 1H-MR 2D spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) allow robust quantification of the respective signals in large regions of the brain simultaneously.17

We hypothesized that NAA levels of the NAWM of NMO do not differ from those of controls. For this purpose, we applied spatially resolved MRSI operating at 3T. Concentrations of metabolites were quantified in relation to each other as well as in respect to the concentration of internal tissue water of well-defined regions of NAWM.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Before the study, written informed consent was obtained from all patients and volunteers.

Eight patients with clinically definite NMO4 or remitting longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM)4 and 8 healthy volunteers were included. Additionally, all patients with NMO/LETM were found to have positive findings on a commercially available test for NMO−immunoglobin G (IgG).5,18 All patients with NMO were carefully observed, including by the use of close meshed controls of NMO-IgG antibody titers and MR imaging from the brain and spinal cord.18,19 Clinical relapses were also verified by the presence of contrast media−enhancing lesions in respective locations (Table).19 A complete survey of our patients with NMO and controls is provided in the Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Clinical data of patients with NMO and controls

MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopy

MRSI at a magnetic field strength of 3T was performed to assess the metabolic pattern in the NAWM. MRSI measurements were performed parallel to axial T1- and T2-weighted sections. Routine automatic adjustments were applied before data acquisition. A point-resolved spectroscopy sequence was used for the rectangular voxel of interest selection (8 × 8 × 1 cm) in the frontoparietal white matter well above the lateral ventricles. Special care was taken to avoid skull and subcutaneous tissue contamination. A chemical shift selective saturation sequence was used for water suppression. Sequence parameters included the following: TR/TE, 1500/135 ms; 16 × 16 elliptic weighted phase-encoding steps across a 16 × 16 cm FOV; section thickness of 1 cm; 50% Hanning filter; and 3 averages. To obtain an internal quantification reference, we performed additional scanning with the same timing and geometric parameters without water suppression. The total acquisition time of the spectroscopic sequences was <15 minutes.

Quantification of the spectra was performed off-line in the time domain by using the jMRUI software package.20,21 Signals from voxels (8–12 voxels per patient) matching exclusively frontal white matter without any signs of lesion load on conventional T2-weighted images were selected. For the processing of metabolite spectra, the remaining water signal intensity was removed by using a Hankel-Lanczos singular value decomposition filter, and amplitudes of Cho, Cr, and NAA signals were calculated with appropriate prior knowledge by using the advanced method for accurate, robust, and efficient spectral fitting.22,23 The amplitude of water signal intensity for each processed voxel was assessed from the scan without water suppression.

Concentrations of metabolites are given as ratios of signal intensities of NAA to Cr, NAA to Cho, and Cho to Cr, respectively. Additionally, absolute concentrations of Cho, Cr, and NAA were calculated by using water signal intensity from the voxel identical to the internal reference. Monoexponential spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation were assumed, and published values of T1 and T2 relaxation times of water and respective metabolites measured at 3T in the NAWM of healthy volunteers were used for relaxation corrections.24,25

Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov) were applied (Statgraphics Plus; http://www.statgraphics.com/statgraphics_plus.htm). All tests were classified as significant if the P value was < .05.

Results

Examples of MR spectra of NMO and a healthy control are given in Fig 1. The relative SD of spectral fitting for all included spectra was ≤5%. All MR spectroscopy data of the NAWM are presented in detail in Fig 2 (ratios of metabolites, relative concentrations) and in Fig 3 (absolute metabolic concentrations).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Spectral region including resonance lines of choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), and N-acetylaspartate (NAA). Left: Anatomic T2-weighted MR images with the depiction of 1H-MR 2D spectroscopic imaging point-resolved spectroscopy sequence box volume of interest (gray, 8 × 8 cm) and voxels in the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) chosen for the spectroscopic data evaluation. Right: Representative MR spectra from a single voxel with original spectra (lower trace); advanced method for accurate, robust, and efficient spectral fitting estimate (second trace); individual components (third trace); and fit residue (upper trace). NMO indicates neuromyelitis optica; Co, controls.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

MR spectroscopy ratios of brain metabolites in the NAWM of patients with NMO and controls. White indicates patients with NMO; gray, controls; squares, NAA:Cr ratio; circles, NAA:Cho ratio; triangles, Cho:Cr ratio; bars, means.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

MR spectroscopy absolute concentrations of brain metabolites in the NAWM of patients with NMO and controls. White indicates patients with NMO; gray, controls; circles, NAA absolute concentrations; squares, Cr absolute concentrations; triangles, Cho absolute concentrations; bars, means.

To sum up briefly, neither relative nor absolute concentrations of the examined metabolite (NAA, Cr, and Cho) were found between NMO patients and controls (P > .05).

Discussion

The purpose of our study was to clarify whether there can be diffuse axonal damage in the NAWM of patients with NMO. Therefore, we used 1H-MR spectroscopy operating at 3T and measured the absolute concentrations of metabolites by a chemical shift imaging (multivoxel) technique to overcome possible technical limitations.

The varying quality of the MR spectra results mostly from different field strengths and spectroscopic methods. In our study, hardware (3T MR imaging system) improvement yielding an increased signal intensity-to-noise ratio allowed improved accuracy of the spectral fit.17 The application of the MRSI method with the nominal geometric resolution of 1 cm3, instead of the rather crude single-volume spectroscopy on voxels of usually 8 cm3, decreases the possibility of partial volume effects in the spectra and brings further improvements of the signal intensity-to-noise ratio by decreasing the intravoxel dephasing effects.17 Furthermore, acquisition of an 8 × 8 spectroscopic signal-intensity matrix allows the addition of signals from appropriate voxels forming so-called anatomy-matched voxels, covering larger, more representative regions of NAWM. In respect to the methods of metabolite quantitation, the well-accepted approach of water signal intensity as an internal concentration reference used here eliminates the effects of possible concurrent changes of separate metabolite signal intensity on their ratios.17

In our study, we found no metabolic changes in the NAWM of patients with NMO. The absence of axonal metabolic changes in the NAWM of patients with NMO is consistent with the relapsing-remitting nature of the disease.1,4 Only very seldom does NMO follow a progressive course.10 CNS inflammation occurs only temporarily when patients relapse and is confined to the blood-brain barrier and perivascular foci only.4,6 The entire brain parenchyma seems not affected (continuously) in patients with NMO.1,26 In contrast to NMO in classic RRMS, even in very early disease stages, axonal metabolic changes and damage might be found in a subgroup of patients with RRMS,27 whereas in other patients with RRMS, NAA levels are normal and remain stable for years (F.A.-.E., unpublished data; 2007–2009; manuscript in preparation).28

Our MR spectroscopy data confirm the previous observation of Bichuetti et al,26 who studied 16 patients with NMO and 16 controls, and the clinical observations found by others and ourselves.4,10,18 The main differences from our study are that Bichuetti et al used a 1H-MR spectroscopy operating at 1.5T (single-voxel technique, and ratios of NAA and Cho to Cr), their patients were not analyzed for the presence of NMO-IgG antibodies, and no CSF data were provided.

Conclusions

NAA levels were found to be normal in 8 patients with clinically definite NMO (all positive for NMO-IgG in serum) measured by chemical shift imaging with 1H-MR spectroscopy operating at 3T.

Footnotes

  • Fahmy Aboul-Enein and Martin Krssak contributed equally to this study.

  • This work was funded by the Multiple Sklerose Forschungsgesellschaft Wien (www.ms-ges.or.at) and by the Medical Research Society Vienna, DC (www.mfg22.at). For MR spectroscopy analysis, MRUI software was used (http://www.mrui.uab.es./mrui). MRUI development and improvement were secured thanks to the European Union project HCM-CHRX-CT94–0432 (1994–1997) and TMR/Networks ERB-FMRX -CT970160 (1998–2001).20,21

  • Previously presented at: World Congress on Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, September 17–20, 2008; Montreal, Ontario, Canada; and Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, May 16–22, 2009; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wingerchuk DM,
    2. Lennon VA,
    3. Lucchinetti CF,
    4. et al
    . The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 805–15
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. de Seze J,
    2. Lebrun C,
    3. Stojkovic T,
    4. et al
    . Is Devic's neuromyelitis optica a separate disease? A comparative study with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 521–25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Weinshenker BG,
    2. Wingerchuk DM,
    3. Nakashima I,
    4. et al
    . OSMS is NMO, but not MS: proven clinically and pathologically. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 110–11
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wingerchuk DM,
    2. Lennon VA,
    3. Pittock SJ,
    4. et al
    . Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2006; 66: 1485–89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lennon VA,
    2. Wingerchuk DM,
    3. Kryzer TJ,
    4. et al
    . A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004; 364: 2106–12
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lucchinetti CF,
    2. Mandler RN,
    3. McGavern D,
    4. et al
    . A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic's neuromyelitis optica. Brain 2002; 125: 1450–61
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sinclair C,
    2. Kirk J,
    3. Herron B,
    4. et al
    . Absence of aquaporin-4 expression in lesions of neuromyelitis optica but increased expression in multiple sclerosis lesions and normal-appearing white matter. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 113: 187–94
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Roemer SF,
    2. Parisi JE,
    3. Lennon VA,
    4. et al
    . Pattern-specific loss of aquaporin-4 immunoreactivity distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2007; 130: 1194–205
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Warabi Y,
    2. Matsumoto Y,
    3. Hayashi H
    . Interferon beta-1b exacerbates multiple sclerosis with severe optic nerve and spinal cord demyelination. J Neurol Sci 2007; 252: 57–61 Epub 2006 Nov 27
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wingerchuk DM,
    2. Pittock SJ,
    3. Lucchinetti CF,
    4. et al
    . A secondary progressive clinical course is uncommon in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2007; 68: 603–5
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Miller DH,
    2. Weinshenker BG,
    3. Filippi M,
    4. et al
    . Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach. Mult Scler 2008; 14: 1157–74
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sarchielli P,
    2. Presciutti O,
    3. Pelliccioli GP,
    4. et al
    . Absolute quantification of brain metabolites by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in normal-appearing white matter of multiple sclerosis patients. Brain 1999; 122: 513–21
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wattjes MP,
    2. Harzheim M,
    3. Kuhl CK,
    4. et al
    . Does high-field MR imaging have an influence on the classification of patients with clinically isolated syndromes according to current diagnostic MR imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1794–98
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bagory M,
    2. Durand-Dubief F,
    3. Ibarrola D,
    4. et al
    . “Absolute” quantification in magnetic resonance spectroscopy: validation of a clinical protocol in multiple sclerosis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007; 1: 3458–61
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rigotti DJ,
    2. Inglese M,
    3. Gonen O
    . Whole-brain N-acetylaspartate as a surrogate marker of neuronal damage in diffuse neurologic disorders. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1843–49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bitsch A,
    2. Bruhn H,
    3. Vougioukas V,
    4. et al
    . Inflammatory CNS demyelination: histopathologic correlation with in vivo quantitative proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1619–27
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Jansen JF,
    2. Backes WH,
    3. Nicolay K,
    4. et al
    . 1H MR spectroscopy of the brain: absolute quantification of metabolites. Radiology 2006; 240: 318–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Jarius S,
    2. Aboul-Enein F,
    3. Waters P,
    4. et al
    . Antibody to aquaporin-4 in the long-term course of neuromyelitis optica. Brain 2008; 131 (Pt 11): 3072–80 Epub 2008 Oct 22
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Krampla W,
    2. Aboul-Enein F,
    3. Jecel J,
    4. et al
    . Spinal cord lesions in patients with neuromyelitis optica: a retrospective long-term MRI follow-up study. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 2535–43 Epub 2009 May 5
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Naressi A,
    2. Couturier C,
    3. Castang I,
    4. et al
    . Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals. Comput Biol Med 2001; 31: 269–86
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Naressi A,
    2. Couturier C,
    3. Devos JM,
    4. et al
    . Java-based graphical user interface for the MRUI quantitation package. MAGMA 2001; 2: 141–52
  22. 22.↵
    1. de Beer R,
    2. van den Boogaart A,
    3. van Ormondt D,
    4. et al
    . Application of time-domain fitting in the quantification of in vivo 1H spectroscopic imaging data sets. NMR Biomed 1992; 5: 171–78
    PubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Vanhamme L,
    2. van den Boogaart A,
    3. Van Huffel S
    . Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge. J Magn Reson 1997; 129: 35–43
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wansapura JP,
    2. Holland SK,
    3. Dunn RS,
    4. et al
    . NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 531–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Mlynárik V,
    2. Gruber S,
    3. Moser E,
    4. et al
    . Proton T (1) and T (2) relaxation times of human brain metabolites at 3 Tesla. NMR Biomed 2001; 14: 325–31
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Bichuetti DB,
    2. Rivero RL,
    3. de Oliveira EM,
    4. et al
    . White matter spectroscopy in neuromyelitis optica: a case control study. J Neurol 2008; 255: 1895–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Wattjes MP,
    2. Harzheim M,
    3. Lutterbey GG,
    4. et al
    . Axonal damage but no increased glial cell activity in the normal-appearing white matter of patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis using high-field magnetic resonance spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1517–22
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. B Benedetti B,
    2. Rovaris M,
    3. Rocca MA,
    4. et al
    . In-vivo evidence for stable neuroaxonal damage in the brain of patients with benign multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2009; 15: 789–94
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received April 15, 2009.
  • Accepted after revision June 18, 2009.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 31 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 31, Issue 1
1 Jan 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diffuse White Matter Damage Is Absent in Neuromyelitis Optica
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
F. Aboul-Enein, M. Krššák, R. Höftberger, D. Prayer, W. Kristoferitsch
Diffuse White Matter Damage Is Absent in Neuromyelitis Optica
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2010, 31 (1) 76-79; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1791

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Diffuse White Matter Damage Is Absent in Neuromyelitis Optica
F. Aboul-Enein, M. Krššák, R. Höftberger, D. Prayer, W. Kristoferitsch
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2010, 31 (1) 76-79; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1791
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MR T2-relaxation time as an indirect measure of brain water content and disease activity in NMOSD
  • An optimal 1H-MRS technique at 7T: Proof-of-principle in Chronic Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Brain Lesions and Normal Appearing Brain Tissue
  • Quantitative 7T MRI does not detect occult brain damage in neuromyelitis optica
  • Neuromyelitis Optica: A Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging Study
  • Conventional and Advanced Imaging in Neuromyelitis Optica
  • Serum and CSF N-acetyl aspartate levels differ in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica
  • Comment on "Global N-Acetylaspartate Declines Even in Benign Multiple Sclerosis"
  • Crossref (45)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • White Matter Atrophy and Cognitive Dysfunctions in Neuromyelitis Optica
    Frederic Blanc, Vincent Noblet, Barbara Jung, François Rousseau, Felix Renard, Bertrand Bourre, Nadine Longato, Nadjette Cremel, Laure Di Bitonto, Catherine Kleitz, Nicolas Collongues, Jack Foucher, Stephane Kremer, Jean-Paul Armspach, Jerome de Seze, Pablo Villoslada
    PLoS ONE 2012 7 4
  • Reduced NAA-Levels in the NAWM of Patients with MS Is a Feature of Progression. A Study with Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3 Tesla
    Fahmy Aboul-Enein, Martin Krššák, Romana Höftberger, Daniela Prayer, Wolfgang Kristoferitsch, Juri G. Gelovani
    PLoS ONE 2010 5 7
  • Advanced magnetic resonance imaging of neuromyelitis optica: a multiparametric approach
    A Pichiecchio, E Tavazzi, G Poloni, M Ponzio, F Palesi, M Pasin, L Piccolo, D Tosello, A Romani, R Bergamaschi, G Piccolo, S Bastianello
    Multiple Sclerosis Journal 2012 18 6
  • Neuromyelitis Optica in Austria in 2011: To Bridge the Gap between Neuroepidemiological Research and Practice in a Study Population of 8.4 Million People
    Fahmy Aboul-Enein, Thomas Seifert-Held, Simone Mader, Bettina Kuenz, Andreas Lutterotti, Helmut Rauschka, Paulus Rommer, Fritz Leutmezer, Karl Vass, Agathe Flamm-Horak, Robert Stepansky, Wilfried Lang, Elisabeth Fertl, Thomas Schlager, Thomas Heller, Christian Eggers, Georg Safoschnik, Siegrid Fuchs, Jörg Kraus, Hamid Assar, Stefan Guggenberger, Martin Reisz, Peter Schnabl, Martina Komposch, Philipp Simschitz, Alena Skrobal, Alexander Moser, Mario Jeschow, Dorothea Stadlbauer, Manfred Freimüller, Michael Guger, Susanne Schmidegg, Claudia Franta, Vera Weiser, Stefan Koppi, Margret Niederkorn-Duft, Bettina Raber, Iris Schmeissner, Julia Jecel, Alexander Tinchon, Maria K. Storch, Markus Reindl, Thomas Berger, Wolfgang Kristoferitsch, Ralf Andreas Linker
    PLoS ONE 2013 8 11
  • Conventional and Advanced Imaging in Neuromyelitis Optica
    Y. Barnett, I. J. Sutton, M. Ghadiri, L. Masters, R. Zivadinov, M. H. Barnett
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 8
  • The Role of Demyelination in Neuromyelitis Optica Damage: Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging Study
    Fernanda C. Rueda Lopes, Thomas Doring, Christianne Martins, Fernanda C. Cabral, Fabíola R. Malfetano, Valéria C. S. R. Pereira, Soniza Alves-Leon, Emerson L. Gasparetto
    Radiology 2012 263 1
  • Brain parenchymal damage in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder – A multimodal MRI study
    F. Pache, H. Zimmermann, C. Finke, A. Lacheta, S. Papazoglou, J. Kuchling, J. Wuerfel, B. Hamm, K. Ruprecht, F. Paul, A. U. Brandt, M. Scheel
    European Radiology 2016 26 12
  • High Resolution Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) in Multiple Sclerosis: The First Follow Up Study over Two Years
    Nermin Serbecic, Fahmy Aboul-Enein, Sven C. Beutelspacher, Clemens Vass, Wolfgang Kristoferitsch, Hans Lassmann, Andreas Reitner, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Christoph Kleinschnitz
    PLoS ONE 2011 6 5
  • Diffusion tensor imaging of normal‐appearing white matter in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis
    S.‐H. Kim, K. Kwak, J.‐W. Hyun, A. Joung, S. H. Lee, Y.‐H. Choi, J.‐M. Lee, H. J. Kim
    European Journal of Neurology 2017 24 7
  • An Optimized Immunohistochemistry Technique Improves NMO-IgG Detection: Study Comparison with Cell-Based Assays
    Romana Höftberger, Lidia Sabater, Romain Marignier, Fahmy Aboul-Enein, Raphaël Bernard-Valnet, Helmut Rauschka, Anne Ruiz, Yolanda Blanco, Francesc Graus, Josep Dalmau, Albert Saiz, Ralf Andreas Linker
    PLoS ONE 2013 8 11

More in this TOC Section

  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire