Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
    • Author Policies
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
    • Author Policies
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleHealth Care Reform Vignette

Physician Quality Reporting System

N. Anumula and P.C. Sanelli
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2011, 32 (11) 2000-2001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2912
N. Anumula
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.C. Sanelli
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: A brief review of the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) is presented highlighting the program's legislative history, eligibility requirements and incentive payment plan. Specifically, PQRS measures applicable to neuroradiology practice are discussed. Several steps are suggested for individual physicians or group practices to start participation in the program. Resources are also provided for further information on the program requirements and PQRS measures.

ABBREVIATIONS

CMS
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
PFS
Physician Fee Schedule

PQRS stands for the Physician Quality Reporting System. This program, which began is 2007, provides an incentive payment for eligible physicians who satisfactorily report data on quality measures for covered PFS services furnished to Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service beneficiaries.

What is the History of the PQRS?

The current PQRS originated from multiple prior acts of federal legislation. In 2006, the Tax Relief and Health Care Act (TRHCA) established a PQRS, which included a 1.5% incentive payment with a cap for eligible physicians who satisfactorily reported data on quality measures for covered services furnished to Medicare. In 2007 the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act authorized continuation of the PQRS for 2008 and 2009. This provided a 1.5% incentive payment in 2008 and removed the cap established by the TRHCA. In 2008, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act established the PQRS as a permanent program. It also increased the incentive payment to 2% of the total allowed charges for PFS-covered professional services in 2008 and 2009.

What Changes Are Expected in the Incentive Payment Plan?

The Affordable Care Act, signed into law by President Obama in 2010, made a number of changes to the PQRS, including a gradual decrease in the incentive payment, eventually requiring that quality measures be met to receive the maximum Medicare payment for services. In 2011, the program decreased the incentive payment to 1% of the total allowed charges for PFS-covered professional services. The incentive will further decrease to 0.5% in 2012–2014 and will eventually become a penalty starting in 2015 if not met. The expected penalty is a 1.5% reduction in the total allowed charges for PFS-covered professional services. In 2016, there will be further reduction to 2% in payment for services if the reporting measures are not met.

What Measures Does the PQRS Cover?

The PQRS consists of more than 200 quality measures for Medicare patients including various aspects of care, such as prevention, chronic and acute care management, procedure-related care, resource use, and care coordination. Fourteen of these quality measures apply to radiologists: fluoroscopy, 1; nuclear medicine, 1; mammography, 2; stroke, 2; perioperative care, 4; preventive care and screening, 2; health information technology, 2.

At least 3 measures are applicable to a neuroradiologist in practice: 1) Measure 10, Stroke and Stroke Rehabilitation: Computed Tomography, or MR Imaging Reports refer to the percentage of final reports for CT or MR imaging studies within 24 hours of arrival to the hospital for patients aged 18 years and older with either a diagnosis of ischemic stroke or TIA or intracranial hemorrhage or at least 1 documented symptom consistent with ischemic stroke or TIA or intracranial hemorrhage that includes documentation of the presence or absence of each of the following: hemorrhage and mass lesion and acute infarction; 2) Measure 195, Stenosis Measurement in Carotid Imaging Reports is the percentage of final reports for all patients, regardless of age, for carotid imaging studies (neck MR angiography, neck CT angiography, neck duplex sonography, carotid angiogram) performed that include direct or indirect reference to measurements of the distal internal carotid diameter as the denominator for the stenosis measurement; and 3) Measure 145, Radiology-Exposure Time Reported for Procedures Using Fluoroscopy is the percentage of final reports for procedures using fluoroscopy that include documentation of the radiation exposure or exposure time.

How Does the PQRS Work?

The PQRS is a voluntary program. Submission of quality data codes through claims or a qualified registry indicate intent to participate. In claims-based individual reporting, each eligible physician must report a minimum of 3 measures if applicable to his or her practice. There must be 50% compliance in a minimum of 3 measures to qualify for the incentive payment. However, if an eligible physician has less than 3 measures applicable to their practice, they are still able to participate in the program reporting on only their applicable measures.

Each measure consists of 2 major components for determining compliance: 1) “denominator” refers to all eligible cases for a particular measure in your practice, and 2) “numerator” refers to successful reporting of the measure. “Reporting compliance” refers to the percentage of eligible cases that have a PQRS code assigned. The incentive plan is based on obtaining reporting compliance. Physician performance data are published on-line as a list of the eligible professionals who satisfactorily reported PQRS measures for the 2009 program year and beyond. “Quality compliance” refers to the percentage of reported cases that have completed the quality measure. Currently, quality compliance data are collected and monitored by the CMS.

How Do I Get Started?

The next cycle begins January 1, 2012. To get started, there are 5 main steps:

  • 1) Determine whether you are eligible to participate. A list of professionals who are eligible is provided on the CMS Web site (www.cms.hhs.gov).

  • 2) Determine which reporting option best fits your practice (claims-based or registry-based reporting of either individual measures or measure groups).

  • 3) Determine which PQRS measures are applicable to your practice. Eligible professionals who choose to report individual measures should select at least 3 applicable measures to qualify for the incentive payment. If fewer than 3 measures are reported, CMS may apply a measure-applicability validation process to determine eligibility for the incentive payment.

  • 4) Once you have selected the measures, carefully review the following documents:

    • A) Physician Quality Reporting System Measure Specifications Manual for Claims and Registry (http://www.acg.gi.org/members/nataffairs/thisweek/2011PQRSMeasureSpecificationManualforClaimsandRegistryReporting.pdf) (instructions for reporting claims or registry-based measures). A review of the documents for the current year should be performed.

    • B) Physician Quality Reporting System Implementation Guide (http://www.astro.org/PublicPolicy/PQRIInformation/documents/2011implementationguide.pdf) (describes important reporting principles and rationale for measures).

  • 5) Proper documentation is needed in your reports to qualify for the measures! Developing templates for standardized reporting may be helpful. Review the operational procedures in your practice to ensure accurate reporting. Education of the staff, billing office, residents, and fellows (if applicable) is important for obtaining compliance.

Where Can I Find More Information about the PQRS?

More information and details can be found at the CMS Web site: www.cms.hhs.gov/PQRS, including information on eligibility criteria, reporting measures, and reporting statistics by year and specialty.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Pina Sanelli—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Maquet Cardiovascular, Other Relationships: member of the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement.

  • © 2011 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 11
1 Dec 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician Quality Reporting System
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physician Quality Reporting System
N. Anumula, P.C. Sanelli
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2011, 32 (11) 2000-2001; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2912

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Physician Quality Reporting System
N. Anumula, P.C. Sanelli
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2011, 32 (11) 2000-2001; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2912
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS
    • What is the History of the PQRS?
    • What Changes Are Expected in the Incentive Payment Plan?
    • What Measures Does the PQRS Cover?
    • How Does the PQRS Work?
    • How Do I Get Started?
    • Where Can I Find More Information about the PQRS?
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • PQRS and the MACRA: Value-Based Payments Have Moved from Concept to Reality
  • Crossref (11)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design
    Chesney S Oravec, Mustafa Motiwala, Kevin Reed, Douglas Kondziolka, Fred G Barker, L Madison Michael, Paul Klimo
    Neurosurgery 2018 82 5
  • PQRS and the MACRA: Value-Based Payments Have Moved from Concept to Reality
    J.A. Hirsch, T.M. Leslie-Mazwi, G.N. Nicola, M. Bhargavan-Chatfield, D.J. Seidenwurm, E. Silva, L. Manchikanti
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 37 12
  • Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting System: Early National Radiologist Experience and Near-Future Performance Projections
    Richard Duszak, Judy Burleson, David Seidenwurm, Ezequiel Silva
    Journal of the American College of Radiology 2013 10 2
  • Quality Measurements in Radiology: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Survey of Radiology Benefit Management Groups
    Anand Narayan, Christina Cinelli, John A. Carrino, Paul Nagy, Josef Coresh, Victoria G. Riese, Daniel J. Durand
    Journal of the American College of Radiology 2015 12 11
  • Comparison of orthogonal NLP methods for clinical phenotyping and assessment of bone scan utilization among prostate cancer patients
    Jean Coquet, Selen Bozkurt, Kathleen M. Kan, Michelle K. Ferrari, Douglas W. Blayney, James D. Brooks, Tina Hernandez-Boussard
    Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2019 94
  • Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review
    Tim Herbst, Martin Emmert
    BMC Health Services Research 2017 17 1
  • National Initiatives for Measuring Quality Performance for the Practicing Neuroradiologist
    Nikesh Anumula, Pina C. Sanelli
    Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 2012 22 3
  • Principles of Coding and Reimbursement for Surgeons
    Brett Tracy
    2017
  • Time trend analysis of database and registry use in the neurosurgical literature: evidence for the advance of registry science
    Anthony L. Asher, Sally El Sammak, Giorgos D. Michalopoulos, Yagiz U. Yolcu, A. Yohan Alexander, John J. Knightly, Kevin T. Foley, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Robert E. Harbaugh, Geoffrey A. Rose, Domagoj Coric, Erica F. Bisson, Steven D. Glassman, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Mohamad Bydon
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2022 136 6
  • Development of indicators to assess quality and patient pathways in interdisciplinary care for patients with 14 ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions in Germany
    Wiebke Schüttig, Ronja Flemming, Christiane Höhling Mosler, Verena Leve, Olaf Reddemann, Annemarie Schultz, Emmanuelle Brua, Matthias Brittner, Frank Meyer, Johannes Pollmanns, Johnannes Martin, Thomas Czihal, Dominik von Stillfried, Stefan Wilm, Leonie Sundmacher
    BMC Health Services Research 2022 22 1

More in this TOC Section

  • Adding Value to Health Care: Where Radiologists May Contribute
  • Accountable Care Organizations: What Radiologists Should Know
  • The Independent Payment Advisory Board
Show more Health Care Reform Vignette

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire