Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleTechnical Note
Open Access

Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability for Measuring the Wall Area of the Basilar Artery at the Level of the Trigeminal Ganglion on High-Resolution MR Images

N. Ma, X. Lou, T.-Q. Zhao, E.-H.-C. Wong and W.-J. Jiang
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2011, 32 (2) E29-E32; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2049
N. Ma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Lou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.-Q. Zhao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.-H.-C. Wong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.-J. Jiang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: We evaluated the intraobserver and interobserver variability for WA measurement of an atherosclerotic BA by using HRMRI. Ten consecutive patients underwent HRMRI, and the WA of the BA at the level of the trigeminal ganglion was measured by 2 independent readers and repeated by 1 reader 1 month later. There was strong agreement for intraobserver and interobserver measurements in the ICC and by the Bland-Altman method. Measurement of the WA in an atherosclerotic BA by HRMRI was reproducible.

Abbreviations

BA
basilar artery
CI
confidence interval
ETL
echo-train length
FSE
fast spin-echo
HRMRI
high-resolution MR imaging
ICC
intraclass correlation coefficient
PDWI
proton attenuation−weighted imaging
T1WI
T1-weighted imaging
T2WI
T2-weighted imaging
TIA
transient ischemic attack
TOF
time of flight
WA
wall area

Plaque burden, represented by WA, has substantial usefulness in the assessment of atherosclerosis.1 Imaging modalities used to measure plaque burden of the aorta and coronary, carotid, and peripheral arteries include intravascular sonography,2 multidetector CT,3 B-mode sonography determination of arterial intima media thickening,4 and MR imaging.5

HRMRI has advantages over other modalities in depicting the wall of the BA because it is noninvasive and radiation-free and lacks bone artifacts in the posterior fossa.6,7 It also provides excellent boundary definition for BA-CSF and blood-intima borders, which allows a more precise measurement of the WA of the BA. However, to our knowledge, the reproducibility of such measurements by HRMRI has not been addressed. Our goal was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver variability of WA measurements of an atherosclerotic BA by using HRMRI.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This prospective cohort study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained before HRMRI examination. Eligible patients had the following characteristics: 1) ischemic stroke or TIA of the posterior circulation within 90 days, 2) BA stenosis ≥70% on conventional angiography, and 3) ≥2 atherosclerotic risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, and obesity). Hyperlipidemia was defined as a total cholesterol level ≥240 mg/dL, low-attenuation lipoprotein cholesterol level of ≥160 mg/dL, or current use of medication for lowering blood cholesterol levels.

We excluded patients with following conditions: 1) arteritis, 2) claustrophobia or contraindications to MR imaging such as the presence of ferromagnetic implants, 3) medically unable to remain in the MR imaging scanner for >40 minutes, and 4) <2 atherosclerotic risk factors.

MR Imaging Protocol

Cross-sectional imaging was performed with an 8-channel phased-array head coil in a 3T scanner (Signa, TwinSpeed 3T; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). 3D TOF images were obtained with TR/TE = 21/3.2 ms, FOV = 16 × 16 cm, thickness = 1 mm, matrix = 256 × 256, and NEX = 1. Then, PDWI and T2WI of 12–14 sections and T1WI of 4 sections precontrast and postcontrast were acquired, which included images at the level of trigeminal ganglion. If the BA was severely tortuous, the scan plane was angled to ensure that images acquired were perpendicular to the BA. Parameters for PDWI and T2WI were as follows: FSE, TR = 3000 ms, TE = 12.5 ms for PDWI and TE = 62.3 ms for T2WI, FOV = 16 cm × 16 cm, thickness = 2 mm, matrix = 256 × 320, NEX = 2, ETL = 10. Flow compensation and an inferior spatial saturation band were used to suppress the pulsation artifacts induced by inflow blood. T1WI was obtained by double inversion recovery FSE with the following parameters: TR/TI/TE = 800/650/8.6 ms, FOV = 16 × 16 cm, thickness = 2 mm, matrix = 256 × 320, NEX = 4, ETL = 12. Postcontrast T1WI was acquired 5 minutes after gadolinium injection (0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine, Magnevist; Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany). The cross-sectional voxel size was 0.6 × 0.6 mm on TOF and 0.6 × 0.5 mm on T1WI, T2WI, and PDWI. Fat suppression was used to reduce the signal intensity from surrounding fatty tissues. A zip 512 matrix technique was used to enhance spatial resolution.

Measurement of the WA of the BA

An image-quality rating (1 = poor, 2 = adequate, 3 = good) was performed by a radiologist (X.L.) for each image. Patients with poor images due to subject motion or low signal intensity-to-noise ratio were excluded. The BA cross-sectional area at the level of trigeminal ganglion was measured by readers blinded to the clinical presentation, by using research software (FuncTool 2 software, GE Healthcare) on the ADW4.3 workstation (Sun Microsystems, Santa Clara, California). The BA-CSF border was used to manually trace the vessel area and the blood-intima boundary for the lumen area. The WA was calculated as the difference between vessel area and lumen area.

To assess intraobserver variability, reader 1 (X.L.) measured the WA at the level of trigeminal ganglion, with the second set of measurements performed 1 month later. To examine interobserver variability, reader 2 (N.M.) determined the WA at the same level and compared the measurements with the first set obtained by reader 1.

Data Analysis

The ICC and the lower and upper limits the of the 95% CI were determined for intraobserver and interobserver variability. The Bland-Altman method for comparing paired measurements on T1WI, PDWI, T2WI, and postcontrast T1WI was used to determine intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

Results

Between June 2008 and July 2009, 10 consecutive male patients with symptomatic BA atherosclerosis underwent 3T HRMRI. Their mean age was 55 years (range, 45–72 years). All patients had 2 (n = 5) or more (n = 5) atherosclerotic risk factors. The qualifying event was posterior circulation ischemic stroke in 1 and TIA in 9 within 90 days.

Image-quality ratings of all images were adequate-to-good. Thus, WA measurements of the BA at the level of trigeminal ganglion were available for analysis in all patients (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 48-year-old man with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking history presented with recurrent transient attacks of dizziness and diplopia for 10 months. A, At the level of trigeminal ganglion, T1WI shows slight hyperintense eccentric wall thickening of the BA compared with the temporal muscle (not shown). PDWI (B) and T2WI (C) show isointense vessel wall thickening. D, Postcontrast T1WI shows heterogeneous enhancement, suggesting that the atherosclerotic plaque was composed of a lipid-rich necrotic core. The BA-CSF border and the blood-intima border can be demarcated on T1WI (A), PDWI (B), T2WI (C), and postcontrast T1WI (D). The outlines of the BA lumen and outer wall boundary are shown on T1WI (E), PDWI (F), T2WI (G), and postcontrast T1WI (H).

The intraobserver variability was small for measuring WA on T1WI, PDWI, T2WI, and postcontrast T1WI, with the ICC ranging from 0.973 to 0.980 (Table). The interobserver variability was also small on these sequences, with the ICC ranging from 0.957 to 0.989 (Table).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

ICCs and lower and upper limits of the 95% CI for intraobserver and interobserver variability

The Bland-Altman plot showed strongly agreeing intraobserver (Fig 2) and interobserver (Fig 3) measurements on T1WI, PDWI, T2WI, and postcontrast T1WI.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Bland-Altman plots of intraobserver wall area measurements at the level of the trigeminal ganglion on T1WI (A ), PDWI (B ), T2WI (C ), and postcontrast T1WI (D ).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Bland-Altman plots of interobserver wall area measurements at the level of the trigeminal ganglion on T1WI (A ), PDWI (B ), T2WI (C ), and postcontrast T1WI (D ).

Discussion

This study demonstrates that HRMRI can be used to measure the plaque burden of BA atherosclerosis at the level of trigeminal ganglion with high reproducibility. For this pilot study, we chose the level at the trigeminal ganglion for its easy identification on MR images so that the measurements could be obtained as consistently as possible.

Postcontrast T1WI yields better reproducibility for WA measurements than T1WI, PDWI, and T2WI because the outer wall boundary is more clearly delineated. This is similar to previous findings in a carotid atherosclerosis study,8 because the arterial wall, including the adventitia layer, is better penetrated by gadolinium-based contrast agents marking the outer wall boundary. To help delineate the vessel wall on PDWI and T2WI sequences, flow compensation and the inferior spatial saturation band were used in our study to suppress the inflow blood signal intensity and to minimize pulsation artifacts. Although the intraobserver and interobserver variability was greater on PDWI and T2WI sequences, it was still acceptable. However, these sequences have the advantage of requiring no contrast and less scanning time. Although obvious calcium in the vessel wall was not encountered in our patients, manually tracing the vessel area is difficult when calcium is present, especially on TIWI, because both CSF and calcium are hypointense. PDWI and T2WI may be more useful for distinguishing the vessel lumen in the presence of calcified plaque because CSF is hyperintense and calcium is hypointense.

HRMRI can potentially be used to monitor the progression or regression of BA atherosclerotic plaque, but there are some limitations to this study. First, despite our intention to obtain a precise and consistent measurement site by using the trigeminal ganglion as a prominent landmark, some discrepancies on follow-up imaging could not be entirely ruled out due to small size vessel and tortuosity. Second, only a focal site of BA plaque was measured, and it might not be representative of the changes in lesion burden for the rest of the vessel. 3D MR imaging measurements of the BA wall volume may overcome both of these limitations. Third, the appearance of a plaque component on different MR imaging sequences was not analyzed in our current studies and should be further investigated in the future.

Conclusions

Measurement of the WA in an atherosclerotic BA at the level of the trigeminal ganglion by HRMRI is reproducible. This imaging technique can potentially be used in future studies to monitor the effects of therapeutic intervention on BA plaque progression or regression.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30670731) and PLA 11 5th Medical Foundation (06Q070).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zhang S,
    2. Cai J,
    3. Luo Y,
    4. et al
    . Measurement of carotid wall volume and maximum area with contrast-enhanced 3D MR imaging: initial observations. Radiology 2003;228:200–05
    PubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mintz GS,
    2. Nissen SE,
    3. Anderson WD,
    4. et al
    . American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS): a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Leber AW,
    2. Knez A,
    3. von Ziegler F,
    4. et al
    . Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pignoli P,
    2. Tremoli E,
    3. Poli A,
    4. et al
    . Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1986;74:1399–406
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Beach KW,
    3. Smith LH Jr.,
    4. et al
    . Measurement of atherosclerotic carotid plaque size in vivo using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1998;98:2666–71
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Klein IF,
    2. Lavallée PC,
    3. Touboul PJ,
    4. et al
    . High-resolution MRI identifies basilar artery plaques in paramedian pontine infarct. Neurology 2005;64:551–52
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Swartz RH,
    2. Bhuta SS,
    3. Farb RI,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial arterial wall imaging using high-resolution 3-Tesla contrast-enhanced MRI. Neurology 2009;72:627–34
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Yuan C,
    2. Kerwin WS,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al
    . Contrast-enhanced high resolution MRI for atherosclerotic carotid artery tissue characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:62–67
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received October 31, 2009.
  • Accepted after revision January 12, 2010.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 2
1 Feb 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability for Measuring the Wall Area of the Basilar Artery at the Level of the Trigeminal Ganglion on High-Resolution MR Images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
N. Ma, X. Lou, T.-Q. Zhao, E.-H.-C. Wong, W.-J. Jiang
Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability for Measuring the Wall Area of the Basilar Artery at the Level of the Trigeminal Ganglion on High-Resolution MR Images
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2011, 32 (2) E29-E32; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2049

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability for Measuring the Wall Area of the Basilar Artery at the Level of the Trigeminal Ganglion on High-Resolution MR Images
N. Ma, X. Lou, T.-Q. Zhao, E.-H.-C. Wong, W.-J. Jiang
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2011, 32 (2) E29-E32; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2049
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Perfusion and plaque evaluation to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis
  • Imaging Intracranial Vessel Wall Pathology With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Prospects and Future Directions
  • Crossref (14)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Imaging Intracranial Vessel Wall Pathology With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Nikki Dieleman, Anja G. van der Kolk, Jaco J.M. Zwanenburg, Anita A. Harteveld, Geert J. Biessels, Peter R. Luijten, Jeroen Hendrikse
    Circulation 2014 130 2
  • Reproducibility of high-resolution MRI for the middle cerebral artery plaque at 3T
    Wan-Qun Yang, Biao Huang, Xin-Tong Liu, Hong-Jun Liu, Pei-Jun Li, Wen-Zhen Zhu
    European Journal of Radiology 2014 83 1
  • Contrast-Enhanced 3T High-Resolution MR Imaging in Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Basilar Artery Stenosis
    X. Lou, N. Ma, L. Ma, W.-J. Jiang
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2013 34 3
  • High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Vessel Wall Imaging for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
    Xian-Jin Zhu, Wu Wang, Zun-Jing Liu
    Chinese Medical Journal 2016 129 11
  • Perfusion and plaque evaluation to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis
    Jinhao Lyu, Ning Ma, Chenglin Tian, Feng Xu, Hang Shao, Xin Zhou, Lin Ma, Xin Lou
    Stroke and Vascular Neurology 2019 4 3
  • Basilar artery atherosclerotic plaques distribution in symptomatic patients: A 3.0T high-resolution MRI study
    Biao Huang, Wan-Qun Yang, Xin-Tong Liu, Hong-Jun Liu, Pei-Jun Li, Hai-Ke Lu
    European Journal of Radiology 2013 82 4
  • MR Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging: A Systematic Review
    Jae W. Song, Brianna F. Moon, Morgan P. Burke, Srikant Kamesh Iyer, Mark A. Elliott, Haochang Shou, Steven R. Messé, Scott E. Kasner, Laurie A. Loevner, Mitchell D. Schnall, John E. Kirsch, Walter R. Witschey, Zhaoyang Fan
    Journal of Neuroimaging 2020 30 4
  • Wall Imaging for Unilateral Intracranial Vertebral Artery Hypoplasia with Three-dimensional High-isotropic Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images
    Xian-Jin Zhu, Wu Wang, Bin Du, Lei Liu, Xin-Xin He, Li-Bin Hu, Xue-Bin Zhang, Zun-Jing Liu, Wei-Jian Jiang
    Chinese Medical Journal 2015 128 12
  • Noninvasive visualization of the basilar artery wall and branch ostia with high‐resolution three‐dimensional black‐blood sequence at 3 tesla
    Xin Lou, Ning Ma, Hao Shen, Kaining Shi, Weijian Jiang, Lin Ma
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2014 39 4
  • Reproducibility of 3.0T High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Identification and Quantification of Middle Cerebral Arterial Atherosclerotic Plaques
    Deng-Ling Zhao, Cheng Li, Xiao-Hui Chen, Shenghong Ju, Gang Deng, Bo Xie, Gao-Jun Teng
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2019 28 7

More in this TOC Section

  • 3D Fast Spin-Echo T1 Black-Blood Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cervical Artery Dissection
  • The Kety-Schmidt Technique for Quantitative Perfusion and Oxygen Metabolism Measurements in the MR Imaging Environment
  • A Swine Model to Analyze Arterial Structural Changes Induced by Mechanical Thrombectomy
Show more Technical Note

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire